Yeah, that’s true. You’re right.locke_n_load wrote:Make the requirements too stringent, and you won't have many volunteers. Just a thought.AJSully421 wrote:I am a licensed Level 3 Commissioned Security Guard, Level 4 Personal Protection Officer (Body Guard) and the Executive Officer of a Security Company, and a LTC holder.
I say let's do it.
Whatever it takes... require retention holsters, not allow OC, require to pass a MMPI psych test like a Level 4 bodyguard has to, but let's open up law abiding citizens to be able to carry in all schools one way or another.
You might also add an exemption for a licensed Level 4 since they have done a psych eval already. Just a thought.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Let's Really Protect Our Schools”
- Fri Feb 16, 2018 10:54 pm
- Forum: Texas Firearms Coalition
- Topic: Let's Really Protect Our Schools
- Replies: 74
- Views: 49004
Re: Let's Really Protect Our Schools
- Fri Feb 16, 2018 4:08 pm
- Forum: Texas Firearms Coalition
- Topic: Let's Really Protect Our Schools
- Replies: 74
- Views: 49004
Re: Let's Really Protect Our Schools
I am a licensed Level 3 Commissioned Security Guard, Level 4 Personal Protection Officer (Body Guard) and the Executive Officer of a Security Company, and a LTC holder.
I say let's do it.
Whatever it takes... require retention holsters, not allow OC, require to pass a MMPI psych test like a Level 4 bodyguard has to, but let's open up law abiding citizens to be able to carry in all schools one way or another.
You might also add an exemption for a licensed Level 4 since they have done a psych eval already. Just a thought.
I say let's do it.
Whatever it takes... require retention holsters, not allow OC, require to pass a MMPI psych test like a Level 4 bodyguard has to, but let's open up law abiding citizens to be able to carry in all schools one way or another.
You might also add an exemption for a licensed Level 4 since they have done a psych eval already. Just a thought.