As in, "DON'T ROCK THE BOAT!".
Fingers crossed.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “HB1815 Passed the House”
- Tue May 22, 2007 7:03 pm
- Forum: 2007 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: HB1815 Passed the House
- Replies: 30
- Views: 19579
- Fri May 11, 2007 8:45 pm
- Forum: 2007 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: HB1815 Passed the House
- Replies: 30
- Views: 19579
- Fri May 11, 2007 8:30 pm
- Forum: 2007 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: HB1815 Passed the House
- Replies: 30
- Views: 19579
Someone please explain:
This would seem to clear up the issue right here:
Sec. 46.02 (a) A person commits an offense if the person [he]
intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries on or about his or
her person a handgun, illegal knife, or club if the person is not:
(1) on the person's own premises or premises under the
person's control; or
(2) inside of or directly en route to a motor vehicle
that is owned by the person or under the person's control. ...(followed by exceptions)
But then the next section includes this:
(b) Section 46.02 does not apply to a person who:....
(2) is traveling;
Can we hope that the traveling clause can be eliminated before passage?
As long as the ill-defined 'traveling' exists, it will be open to misinterpretation.
This would seem to clear up the issue right here:
Sec. 46.02 (a) A person commits an offense if the person [he]
intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries on or about his or
her person a handgun, illegal knife, or club if the person is not:
(1) on the person's own premises or premises under the
person's control; or
(2) inside of or directly en route to a motor vehicle
that is owned by the person or under the person's control. ...(followed by exceptions)
But then the next section includes this:
(b) Section 46.02 does not apply to a person who:....
(2) is traveling;
Can we hope that the traveling clause can be eliminated before passage?
As long as the ill-defined 'traveling' exists, it will be open to misinterpretation.