Search found 2 matches
Return to “Credit to John from Houston for this one...”
- Sun Jan 08, 2006 8:55 am
- Forum: Goals for 2007
- Topic: Credit to John from Houston for this one...
- Replies: 10
- Views: 9774
Ok Stevie, you have some good points there, I must confess I was only considering the practicle from the standpoint of the renewer. I agree it is not hard to pass. I would think that anyone who goes to the trouble of getting a CHL and then the effort of renewing it most likely shoots well enough to qualify with ease, which was why I thought it need not be repeated.
- Sat Jan 07, 2006 11:21 pm
- Forum: Goals for 2007
- Topic: Credit to John from Houston for this one...
- Replies: 10
- Views: 9774
Speedy license
I think on receipt of the application DPS should
A. IMMEDIATELY check if the packet is complete
B. Run a NIC check on the applicant
C. If A and B are ok, they should then issue a temporary paper license (this should be required to be issued within 5 working days. Temporary paper license would probably NOT qualify for at least some states reciprocity)
D. Run existing backround checks and issue within present 60 day timeframe
I also think the shooting part of the renewal class should be dropped though I favor continuing the requirement for the initial CHL.
By the way, I received my CHL in December, since my Brithday is in January I only got a 4 year (+ 10 days) CHL.
A. IMMEDIATELY check if the packet is complete
B. Run a NIC check on the applicant
C. If A and B are ok, they should then issue a temporary paper license (this should be required to be issued within 5 working days. Temporary paper license would probably NOT qualify for at least some states reciprocity)
D. Run existing backround checks and issue within present 60 day timeframe
I also think the shooting part of the renewal class should be dropped though I favor continuing the requirement for the initial CHL.
By the way, I received my CHL in December, since my Brithday is in January I only got a 4 year (+ 10 days) CHL.