So, they want compromise? OK, let's give them a compromise. They want to eliminate the "Gun Show Loophole"? OK, I'll give it to them. All transfers to be made through a FFL. Here's what I want in return...
1) I want an absolute guarantee that all records are destroyed upon passing the check. Since this is as it is supposed to be anyway, I get this one "for free". I absolutely don't want the background check to be used as a backdoor registry.
2) I want both the National Firearms Act of 1934, and the Gun Control Act of 1968 repealed. That's right, I want access to full-auto military weaponry. Shouldn't be a problem since everybody is background checked anyway, right?
What do 'y'all think? A fair compromise?
Search found 2 matches
Return to “"Gun control deserves serious action.... "”
- Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:25 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: "Gun control deserves serious action.... "
- Replies: 109
- Views: 16585
- Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:04 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: "Gun control deserves serious action.... "
- Replies: 109
- Views: 16585
Re: "Gun control deserves serious action.... "
Is this the "Bite-Me/Biden" general?stroo wrote:Wasn't this the general who dishonored himself by insulting and belittling the President to a reporter from Rolling Stone? He also stopped giving our troops in Afghanistan artillery and air support unless they could verify that no civilians or civilian structures were going to be harmed, thereby endangering the lives of our troops.
Given these bad judgements, and apart from my general cynicism towards generals, I don't think I would trust his opinions on anything.