Bart wrote:If property rights allow someone to ban CHLs carrying then they should also be able to ban LEOs carrying. Also their property rights should allow them to ban piercings, tattoos, speaking Spanish on the property, possession of tobacco, Muslim scarves, underwear, or anything else they want. If property owners can't ban those things then why should they be able to ban guns?
Piercings - Legal to ban
Tattoos - Legal to ban
Speaking Spanish on the property - Legal to ban
Tobacco - Legal to ban
Muslim scarves - Not legal to ban (Religious affiliation, protected by the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Underwear - Legal to ban
Property owners can ban 5 out of the 6 things you mentioned. Unfortunately firearm possession is not a protected class.