Search found 3 matches

by tbrown
Thu Aug 01, 2019 6:10 pm
Forum: General Legislative Discussions
Topic: Lawsuit argues AR-15 illegal
Replies: 42
Views: 7246

Re: Lawsuit argues AR-15 illegal

Alf wrote:
Sat Jul 13, 2019 11:51 am
For informational purposes only.
Image

:mrgreen:
by tbrown
Thu Aug 01, 2019 6:06 pm
Forum: General Legislative Discussions
Topic: Lawsuit argues AR-15 illegal
Replies: 42
Views: 7246

Re: Lawsuit argues AR-15 illegal

Soccerdad1995 wrote:
Mon Jul 08, 2019 5:20 pm
Bump firing is a shooting technique. If bump firing is bad, because we want to limit the rate of fire, then it's a very, very, slippery slope that does not end well.
Tell it to DJT and WLP. They're the ones who shoved gun owners down that slippery slope.
by tbrown
Mon Jul 08, 2019 5:06 pm
Forum: General Legislative Discussions
Topic: Lawsuit argues AR-15 illegal
Replies: 42
Views: 7246

Re: Lawsuit argues AR-15 illegal

The Annoyed Man wrote:
Mon Jul 08, 2019 12:51 pm
Good luck with that. The bumpstock ban notwithstanding, an AR15 still only fires one round per function of the trigger—bumpstock or no bumpstock. And since the ban, there’s no lawful way (just like before bumpstocks were invented) to convert an AR15 to fire at the same rate as a fully automatic weapon.
An AR-15 with a bump stock only fires one round per trigger pull, the same as an AR-15 without one. A bump stock is not required to bump fire an AR-15. It can be "readily" done without a bump stock.



Any intellectually honest person who supported the Trump administration classifying bump stocks as MG must also support reclassifying AR-15 as MG, because they can be "readily" bump fired without modification. To do otherwise is intellectually dishonest.

Return to “Lawsuit argues AR-15 illegal”