Thanks for the link Larry, we can only hope.
Glenn
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Changes to CHL law”
- Sat Jan 08, 2005 4:36 pm
- Forum: Goals for 2007
- Topic: Changes to CHL law
- Replies: 37
- Views: 27853
- Fri Jan 07, 2005 10:08 pm
- Forum: Goals for 2007
- Topic: Changes to CHL law
- Replies: 37
- Views: 27853
- Fri Jan 07, 2005 6:11 pm
- Forum: Goals for 2007
- Topic: Changes to CHL law
- Replies: 37
- Views: 27853
I know I'm late on this, but....
I would like to see a law requiring municipalities to take down 30.06 signs if they are on city buildings that may not prohibit concealed carry. In the municipality where I live, the legal advisor has said there is nothing that makes the city take them down, so they will stay.
I would also like to see the definition of court defined better and should not preclude carry in all of the building or attachments to the building. Where I live the court and the police station have two different addresses and when the court is closed they are seperated by a roll down wall. The PD still has a 30.06 sign and it was explained that the PD is part of the court because the wording of the law.
There is also a city ord. against carry of concealed firearms into city buildings. I do not think this is a lawful ord. and should it not be addressed? The city is not accountable to anyone I guess, but that should change.
Glenn
I would like to see a law requiring municipalities to take down 30.06 signs if they are on city buildings that may not prohibit concealed carry. In the municipality where I live, the legal advisor has said there is nothing that makes the city take them down, so they will stay.
I would also like to see the definition of court defined better and should not preclude carry in all of the building or attachments to the building. Where I live the court and the police station have two different addresses and when the court is closed they are seperated by a roll down wall. The PD still has a 30.06 sign and it was explained that the PD is part of the court because the wording of the law.
There is also a city ord. against carry of concealed firearms into city buildings. I do not think this is a lawful ord. and should it not be addressed? The city is not accountable to anyone I guess, but that should change.
Glenn