TexasCHLforum.com

The real question is when will Strzok's wife kill him? Funny, Gohmert had that same twisted curiosity... That was another dumb thing about the hearing. The character of a man has no meaning. All of that texting was done on taxpayer time with taxpayer provided phones. But there was NO bias, just innocent little lovebirds tweeting. More silliness... There is no question about Strzok's bias. 1. Criticism about marital loyalty? Was it a loving relationship or a stormy one??? 2. How much time spent texting the girlfriend? Maybe this was done during break time or compensated with overtime??? 3. Again, the question should be what did he actually do that was wrong because of his obvious bias in FBI investigations??? According to Justice Dept IG: nothing . McEnroe said it best...

The real question is when will Strzok's wife kill him? Funny, Gohmert had that same twisted curiosity... That was another dumb thing about the hearing...

Incredible that members of Congress can perform as we saw in the Strzok hearing. It was a sad spectacle. They should all be ashamed. Interesting take on how leftists radicals perceive the corruption at the FBI and DOJ. It is pretty darned obvious the FBI (especially this particular scumbag) believes it is our keeper. Congress reacted in the only way they can react when being stonewalled by corrupt and evil leaders of the FBI. Congress has EVERY right to the information they are asking for and the ONLY reason they are not getting it is the Democraps are a huge part of the corruption in Washington. Democraps don't want the truth out. It will destroy the entire party when everyone realizes that Hillary Clinton and Obama are perfect examples of just how corrupt Democraps have become. Really??? The dumbest parts of the hearing were first of all having it ( and public , duh) ignoring the Inspector General's report that there was no improper execution of HRC's or Trump's investigations though Comey's public updates were improper and obviously hurt HRC. Then the committee had been informed BEFORE the hearing about what questions could be not be answered because of the ongoing investigation but the questions were asked anyway. Finally, Strzok was told not to consult with FBI attorneys during the hearing and answer all questions. Dumb beyond words... Don't you think the public should have the chance to hear this FBI agents testimony? Not if there are going to be questions about an ongoing investigation. The man that had the most to do with HRC investigation and interview of which no recordings were taken. He seemed to go out of his way to favor Trump, sharing public info about HRC but nothing about the Trump campaign investigation. The general consensus is that there are two forms of justice, one for the connected and one for the rest of us. This one individual had more to do with that "justice" than anyone else and if you believe that he was not biased in how he treated people under investigation than you are (pick a word). Conspiracy? You don't believe the Inspector General's report? Would you believe Mueller??? I don't consider this a democrat or republican issue. I consider this a justice for all issue and I don't believe justice was accomplished. Can you in all honesty say that he was not influenced by his obvious hatred for Trump, expectation that HRC would win and that he would be in for some career building rewards for his treatment of HRC? The question should have been not whether or not he was biased but what did he actually do wrong. [/b...

Incredible that members of Congress can perform as we saw in the Strzok hearing. It was a sad spectacle. They should all be ashamed. Interesting take on how leftists radicals perceive the corruption at the FBI and DOJ. It is pretty darned obvious the FBI (especially this particular scumbag) believes it is our keeper. Congress reacted in the only way they can react when being stonewalled by corrupt and evil leaders of the FBI. Congress has EVERY right to the information they are asking for and the ONLY reason they are not getting it is the Democraps are a huge part of the corruption in Washington. Democraps don't want the truth out. It will destroy the entire party when everyone realizes that Hillary Clinton and Obama are perfect examples of just how corrupt Democraps have become. Really??? The dumbest parts of the hearing were first of all having it ( and public , duh) ignoring the Inspector General's report that there was no improper execution of HLC's or Trump's investigations though Comey's public updates were improper and obviously hurt HLC. Then the committee had been informed BEFORE the hearing about what questions could be not be answered because of the ongoing investigation but the questions were asked anyway. Finally, Strzok was told not to consult with FBI attorneys during the hearing and answer all questions. Dumb beyond words.....

https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/12/politics/peter-strzok-hearing-congress/index.html Peter Strzok either saint or devil depending on who you listen to after senate hearing. I think his texts say it all. I’ll pick devil. These are pictures of him taken during the hearing: There is something evil brewing in that guy. Incredible that members of Congress can perform as we saw in the Strzok hearing. It was a sad spectacle. They should all be ashamed...

A first-ever honor for a visiting U.S. president: https://twitter.com/TrumpBabyUK/status/1014831369522999296/photo/...

Better get your Hog while they are still made in USA ! http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/26/trump-warns-harley-davidson-big-tax-if-it-sells-back-to-us-following-production-shift.html...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/trump-is-a-bald-faced-liar/2018/06/22/75d70334-7576-11e8-805c-4b67019fcfe4_story.html “Trump is a bald faced liar” :iagree: Sure, but I'm used to seeing the term "barefaced liar" so I looked up bald-faced and it does mean the same: apparent, bald, barefaced, broad, clear, clear-cut, crystal clear, decided, distinct, evident, lucid, luminous, manifest, nonambiguous, obvious, open-and-shut, palpable, patent, pellucid, perspicuous, plain, straightforward, transparent, unambiguous, unambivalent, unequivocal, unmistakable. However, we are talking about our president and I think something like "perspicuous" sounds more respectful. Also, whether one agrees or not, a fact is still a fact. :rules...

George Will is a never trumper. Probably one of the first recipients of an "atomic wedgie" in high school. Same with Steve Whatshisname. Hmm. I always thought these guys were highly respected conservatives. What about conservative Krauthammer? https://whyy.org/articles/rip-charles-krauthammer-who-warned-us-all/ Or conservative David Brooks? https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/09/opinion/trump-republicans.html Conservative ideology, anyone??...

I think it is pretty obvious to any American with intelligence, the Democrats are less concerned with children of the illegal immigrants than they are with the fraudulent votes they can rack up from their parents or traffickers. Funny how they suddenly pretend to have issues. But in this day and age of video, they get busted every time for their lies. https://nyti.ms/2xUZMj9 Ok, the video of Hillary campaigning in 2007 about immigration was interesting but didn't seem to relate to the current issue of separating families. What did I miss? :confused5 You missed the fact, that this law was not, suddenly instituted by Trump, in fact during Barak Hussein's, administration, this exact same scenario, played out, because adults, arrested for crossing the border illegally, were placed in adult, holding facilities, and it is " illegal" to place children in those facilities. What the MSM fails to mention, is that, if adults with children are truly seeking asylum, and they report to a port of entry,they are placed together, with their children, until their case is settled. The only ones being seperated, are those who sneak across the border. There was nothing about immigration law in the video except for a reference that update is needed. Previous administrations used family detention facilities, allowing the whole family to stay together while awaiting their deportation case in immigration court, or alternatives to detention, which required families to be tracked but released from custody to await their court date. Some children may have been separated from the adults they entered with, in cases where the family relationship could not be established, child trafficking was suspected, or there were not sufficient family detention facilities available...

I think it is pretty obvious to any American with intelligence, the Democrats are less concerned with children of the illegal immigrants than they are with the fraudulent votes they can rack up from their parents or traffickers. Funny how they suddenly pretend to have issues. But in this day and age of video, they get busted every time for their lies. https://nyti.ms/2xUZMj9 Ok, the video of Hillary campaigning in 2007 about immigration was interesting but didn't seem to relate to the current issue of separating families. What did I miss? :confused...

This thread serves no useful function any longer except to divide forum members and cause ill will among us. :iagree: I think your post needed a bump Sure, but it is kind of interesting and, if one wishes, easy to ignore. Too bad there has to be personal attacks and name calling though...

If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor. Etc. Obama never lied. In 2009 and again in 2012, PolitiFact rated Obama’s statement Half True, which means the statement is partially correct and partially wrong. While ACA took pains to leave parts of the insurance market alone, some private insurers canceled their plans, or raised rates to force people to switch plans, to avoid meeting some ACA standards. This reminds me of the movie "The Rainmaker" based on a novel by John Grisham. I don't think it is based on a particular true story but this kind of thing was apparently happening in the healthcare market. Whatever happened to ACA's grand replacement with universal, low cost healthcare? s You tell me Dale, As your favorite advocate, Nancy Pelosi, said, " we have to pass it, so we can see what's in it!" When government tries to run any business, it is a failure. I.E. The USPS, Amtrak, etc.. The ACA was nothing but a money grab tax, as SCOTUS ruled. The libtards, hoped that the rich and healthy would sign on and pay to cover the poor, and sick. How's that working for you now? It is a money pit, that is spiraling, down to an unattenable, situation, even more rediculous than the greatest, left wing boondoggle in history, Social Security. Dale I know you hate Trump, but you have nothing more than, some left wing, spin doctor, quotes, to back your rationale. The only reason, the left, is even talking about immigration, is to distract, from the very real, hearings, regarding, the largest scandal, ever perpetrated, and that is the weaponizing of the DOJ, to try to derail Trump's campaign. If you have a better, option, for President, please give us the reasons, because arguing about, who has a better record of honesty, when compared to the Barak Hussein/Hitlery, regime, is a losing proposition, and does nothing, to sway people to your, point of view. All anyone has heard from you, as well as, the left wing politicians, and the MSM, is "We hate Trump", but offer no alternatives. Just sayin..... How about John Kasich? By the way, not that I need to explain anything to you, but I don't hate anyone. :tiphat...

If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor. Etc. Obama never lied. In 2009 and again in 2012, PolitiFact rated Obama’s statement Half True, which means the statement is partially correct and partially wrong. While ACA took pains to leave parts of the insurance market alone, some private insurers canceled their plans, or raised rates to force people to switch plans, to avoid meeting some ACA standards. This reminds me of the movie "The Rainmaker" based on a novel by John Grisham. I don't think it is based on a particular true story but this kind of thing was apparently happening in the healthcare market. Whatever happened to ACA's grand replacement with universal, low cost healthcare...

Why are they separating Paul Manafort from his wife and daughters? Do you think the whole family was conspiring against the United States AND tampered with witnesses too??? When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it. - Frédéric Bastiat "moral code"...