TexasCHLforum.com

He DOES 'look good'. Enjoy.

Same here sir.

Hey folks! I have a couple questions, maybe some of you have answers While waiting for my LTC, I have bought 2 new pistols. 1 FNH FNS-40 and a Canik TP9SA. The FNH seems to fit a Glock-17 holster well, and was wondering who makes a good conceal holster for a weapon line the FNS-40. The Canik TP9SA ...

Big +1 on AlienGear. My son bought me the IWB Cloak Tuck 3.0 version, I love the way it fits me & my M&P 40 & will get the shells for some of my other pistols. ymmv

Congratulations Sir. Grandkids truly are great. Good health to all and enjoy!

Very nice. These are relaxing & informative reads. Thank you.

Although I am quite sure there will be those that wonder why he had to use deadly force instead
of "just shooting the hatchet out of the bgs hand." Insert appropriate comment w large dose of sarcasm.

Stopped typing to talk to my wife and got beat on my post.

GG with a gun kills bg with a hatchet. Job WELL DONE.

Probably free coffee & snacks anytime that clerk is working!!

Dadtodabone, thanks. I figured someone smarter than I would know. While you were posting I was still checking & typing. Very slow typist is an understatement.

Ok, I couldn't let it go. My OCD kicked in & I had to go online and make sure I was remembering correctly. (I heard it somewhere.) Now, we all know that if it's online it must be true hahaha ;-) but this is what I found. The first revolver patent that I can find reference to (wikipedia) was in 1...

MeMelYup wrote:If the people inside had AR's why wouldn't the people outside have them also. It was the 1830's. The revolver hasn't been invented yet.

How about AR's in the civil war?

Actually, revolvers were invented in the early 1800's (not sure when but before 1830) it was a flintlock revolver.

JHP here. FMJ is good for punching targets, it goes through too many other things.

Good post !! Thank you.

Abraham wrote:Smart and beautiful.

I know I'm getting old when I look at her and want to protect her from all you lechers.

hahaha Sir, life does go on.

Jarods opinion :tiphat: (for) was much better written IMO than Henry & Sarahs (against). The numbers for each could have been better researched but, as stated by WildBill, most people cannot interpret it correctly anyway. There is the possibility that the argument was weak because Henry & Sa...