Search found 2623 matches
- Wed May 26, 2010 11:57 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Diamond Back DB380 or Ruger LCP
- Replies: 11
- Views: 3826
Re: Diamond Back DB380 or Ruger LCP
I shot a LCP this morning, as I am considering something VERY light for a replacement pocket gun. The LCP is 12 oz. loaded. The DB380 has had a rash of recent trigger issues, but I like the feel of the gun. Very Glock-like, but I have not shot it. I noted (with my trifocals) that the sights on the L...
- Tue May 25, 2010 11:00 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: "Possession of Unauthorized Firearms"
- Replies: 43
- Views: 7959
Re: "Possession of Unauthorized Firearms"
You seem to be changing the "or" in § 30.06(a)(2)(A) to an "and". You can be prosecuted whether or not you refuse to leave. Simply receiving notice that the handgun was forbidden is enough according to the statute. Yes, if the owner of the property or someone with apparent autho...
- Tue May 25, 2010 9:36 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Confused by all the acronyms
- Replies: 32
- Views: 3451
Re: Confused by all the acronyms
Wow, USA1, that was a lot more than I asked for. Thanks for the info. As for thanking me for my service, I never felt I did anything worth being thanked for. I felt it was my duty to serve, and I did. Others gave a lot more than I including my cousin, Donald, whose name is on the Wall. Regardless, ...
- Tue May 25, 2010 12:11 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: "Possession of Unauthorized Firearms"
- Replies: 43
- Views: 7959
Re: "Possession of Unauthorized Firearms"
He'd be more successful trying to prosecute under 30.06 IF he verbally told you to leave and you refused. If you left, then he would have a problem later tying to prosecute for an offense that didn't occur. § 30.06. TRESPASS BY HOLDER OF LICENSE TO CARRY CONCEALED HANDGUN. (a) A license holder comm...
- Thu May 20, 2010 11:31 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Printing the same as Failure To Conceal?
- Replies: 20
- Views: 3266
Re: Printing the same as Failure To Conceal?
I posted this quote below in another thread. I don't think the law on "printing" is clear at all because of the interpretation of the word "openly" is debatable to me. This is just my opinion, and others may surely disagree. Only you can decide." Sec. 411.171. DEFINITIONS. I...
- Wed May 19, 2010 11:42 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Texas gov. shoots, kills 'wily' coyote during jog
- Replies: 158
- Views: 23768
Re: Texas gov. shoots, kills 'wily' coyote during jog
Coyotes don't howl, but: still. From the "almost never wrong, mostly right, sometimes incorrect, giver of all almost correct information in the universe - Wikipedia" :lol: Communication The calls a coyote makes are high-pitched and variously described as howls, yips, yelps, and barks. The...
- Mon May 17, 2010 10:37 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: How long does it usually take to get a License mailed to you
- Replies: 15
- Views: 4757
Re: How long does it usually take to get a License mailed to
You NEED to get some instruction and go shoot my friend, before you take the test. Go to this site, and it explains the scoring. Do yourself a big favor and train & practice first! http://www.krtraining.com/KRTraining/TexasCHL/CHLtest.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;...
- Mon May 17, 2010 4:49 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Texas gov. shoots, kills 'wily' coyote during jog
- Replies: 158
- Views: 23768
Re: Texas gov. shoots, kills 'wily' coyote during jog
Holy cow! Is Ruger on to something here! I stopped at a LGS today after a range visit. The salesman pulled a new Ruger LCP out of a Ruger box with a label that said "LCP-TEX" Also, on the side of the box it was marked, "For sale to Texans only." Inside was a Ruger LCP with a Texa...
- Sun May 16, 2010 11:36 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: concealed means concealed!
- Replies: 52
- Views: 6190
Re: concealed means concealed!
I for one, would greatly appreciate a fellow CHL holder pointing out an unintentional outline or print problem. However, I would definitely NOT appreciate someone intentionally trying to cause me problems with LEO's or even a security guard by reporting me as "man with a gun" instead of g...
- Sun May 16, 2010 10:19 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: concealed means concealed!
- Replies: 52
- Views: 6190
Re: concealed means concealed!
Correct me if I'm wrong, but "printing" in itself is not against the law. Willful failure to conceal is not the same as printing. Depends on your definition of "printing," and your interpretation of the definition of "concealed Handgun" in CG 411.171 Sec. 411.171. DEFI...
- Sat May 15, 2010 8:09 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: lawyer help- preparing for the future
- Replies: 26
- Views: 4078
Re: lawyer help- preparing for the future
A possible "middle of the road" solution, might be CHLPP. I went ahead and signed with them for $129 a year because they will take care of any CHL incident and help me get my gun back. http://www.chlpp.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; :tiphat: '' On their web ...
- Sat May 15, 2010 12:30 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: lawyer help- preparing for the future
- Replies: 26
- Views: 4078
Re: lawyer help- preparing for the future
A possible "middle of the road" solution, might be CHLPP. I went ahead and signed with them for $129 a year because they will take care of any CHL incident and help me get my gun back. http://www.chlpp.com/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; :tiphat: '' On their web ...
- Fri May 14, 2010 10:56 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: An argument against 30.06
- Replies: 82
- Views: 14764
Re: An argument against 30.06
I agree with what you've said Charles, but unless I am misunderstanding PC 30.05, a CHL is at greater risk if he/she violates the trespass law. According to PC 30.05 penalties are elevated from Class C and B misdemeanors to a Class A, IF I am carrying under my CHL (a deadly weapon) at the time. Plea...
- Fri May 14, 2010 1:08 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: An argument against 30.06
- Replies: 82
- Views: 14764
Re: An argument against 30.06
To me, this is the question that is not being addressed in this thread, and the one I'd love to have input on. Why is ignoring other non-gun related signs placed by property owners NOT a criminal offense, but ignoring the 30.06 sign IS a criminal offense? Seems like it has nothing to do with privat...
- Fri May 14, 2010 11:55 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: An argument against 30.06
- Replies: 82
- Views: 14764
Re: An argument against 30.06
If you post a sign that says "no tatoos in my restaurant" because you want to keep out bikers and other riff-raff, would a guy with a tatoo on his back completely concealed by his shirt be breaking any law (including trespassing 30.05) if he were to enter this restaurant? Now, obviously, ...