TexasCHLforum.com

dale blanker wrote:

Bitter Clinger wrote:

dale blanker wrote: Yes, the whole immigration thing seems to ignore history (where have the real threats come from?) and how (what exceptions if any) and logic (what harm might be caused). I fear that the president is so anxious to fulfill campaign promises that not enough thought is being given. There seems to be too much emphasis on speed and photo-ops.

Really Dale? Ignores history? Do you simply make-up your own history? Where was your faux indignation when Barack Hussein Obama banned Iraqi refugees for six months back in 2011?

I call "applesauce"!

You're ignoring the history where it has shown the problems are coming from. None of the currently banned countries have provided terriorists to America.

The State Department in 2011 stopped processing Iraq refugee requests for six months after the Federal Bureau of Investigation uncovered evidence that several dozen terrorists from Iraq had infiltrated the United States via the refugee program.

Dale,

Save your liberal tears to water the tree that shaded this weed and allowed it to grow. This was caused by Obama and the latest - and currently ONLY - intel we have comes from that failed administration. We have no ability to vet people coming from those countries because of the turmoil left in the wake of Obama's failed policy, one that included sacrificing the lives of 4 Americans in Benghazi to cover up Hussein's illegal gun running to ISIS in Syria.

The ban simply exists to stop terrorists, and the handful of individuals inconvenienced at airports pales next to the thousands of innocent souls who perished, often slowly and painfully at the hands of ISIS, aided and abetted by your President Obama.

Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are not on the list because we can obtain useful Intel from those countries, mainly because Obama spent 300 days golfing when he could have destroyed their government and infrastructure as well, had he just meddled. If you pay attention you will also recognize that the Saudi ruling family appears to be ongoing a positive sea change, and they may no longer be the Wahabi-est sponsor they were a decade earlier - but the jury is still out.

You are entitled to your own opinion, you are not entitled, along with Fauxcahontas Elizabeth Warren, to your own Constitution.

dale blanker wrote: Yes, the whole immigration thing seems to ignore history (where have the real threats come from?) and how (what exceptions if any) and logic (what harm might be caused). I fear that the president is so anxious to fulfill campaign promises that not enough thought is being given. There seems to be too much emphasis on speed and photo-ops.

Really Dale? Ignores history? Do you simply make-up your own history? Where was your faux indignation when Barack Hussein Obama banned Iraqi refugees for six months back in 2011?

I call "applesauce"!

Mxrdad wrote:Per Fox news, after only 5 working days in office, President Trump has already worked on approx. 90% of his campaign promises. 5 DAYS! Mr. Chuck and company better keep up or they will find themselves stuck on 1-2 issues while 4-5 more hit em the next day. I love the energy and commitment President Trump has shown. And tomorrow, he will be having conversations with Putin. Which, tomorrow is Saturday. Isn't that a great change? A President working on a weekend.

mojo84 wrote: Here's the difference between Trump's orders and Obama's so far. Trump's are executive orders giving the executive branch orders and directives to follow the law. They counter/offset/resend the Obama executive orders that erroneously made or changed laws. Trump is leading from the oval office and Obama was legislating from the Oval office. There is a big difference.

Crisp and to the point!

Lynyrd wrote:

mojo84 wrote:

Papa_Tiger wrote:Now imagine if the shoe was on the other foot and Hillary had won and was now doing a lot through executive action, there was talk of the nuclear option on confirming a new member of SCOTUS...

Would we like that? Would she be praised for her bold leadership or would the media still be trying to figure out what hit them?

Just something for thought if we are going to be intellectually honest and internally consistent.

If we are going to be intellectually honest, the mainstream media wouldn't be anywhere near as critical and dishonest regardless what Hillary did. She was the press' golden girl that could do no wrong. Obama benefited from a much friendlier press than Trump has.

The biased press is doing everything they can to play gotcha.

The stories today about all the senior management at the state department resigning is just another example of the biased media lies. 4 people were let go by the Trump administration. They did not resign. The most senior of those ran one of ten departments at state. Yet many, many media outlets jumped on the bandwagon and said the sky is falling.

State Department, home of Madeline Halfbright, Hitlery, and John "Swift Boat" Kerry. My concern is that the cuts at State were not broad or deep enough!

oljames3 wrote:

Bitter Clinger wrote:We should not forget that he was the BEST Salesperson ever for the firearms industry!

Yep. #6 on Uncle Ted's list.
https://libertywritersnews.com/2017/01/ ... priceless/

Thanks. I missed it

dale blanker wrote:

mojo84 wrote:

dale blanker wrote:Things are happening very fast in the oval office. The president seems to still be in campaign mode and concerned about things like inauguration day crowd size and popular vote so it doesn't seem like he'd be able to give much thought to what's happening. Wouldn't you like to be a fly on the wall to see how things are being developed and who is really doing it?

Dale, you choose to not understand as is doesn't fit with your agenda and political position. Do you not realize the bigger picture that Trump is trying to bring attention? It's about the media being biased and dishonest, not the size of,the crowd.

Hey, wait, what? I'm not passing judgment on anything. Just curious about how things are happening - why so much time is wasted on trivial things like crowd size in Spicer's first 2 press conferences. And then there's unsupported claims about voter fraud. Maybe the objective is to annoy and distract the left - ok, how does that help anything? Kid stuff?

While you were whining, this:

Text of Trump's executive order on interior immigration enforcement
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01 ... tates.html

Text of Trump's executive order on border security
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01 ... ments.html

Mxrdad wrote:In another thread, there was a debate on the last Administrations accomplishments and I openly said I couldn't think of ANY positive accomplishments. Well, turns out I was wrong. I now have to openly apologize as I can now see, thanks to the link below, there are several positive accomplishments. So, I apologize for my mistake.

Hopefully, this link will work. If not,maybe someone with more smarts than me could fix it?

https://libertywritersnews.com/2017/01/ ... priceless/

We should not forget that he was the BEST Salesperson ever for the firearms industry!