2015 Session - What Was Sent to the Governor?

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


ldj1002
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 77
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 10:44 am

Re: 2015 Session - What Was Sent to the Governor?

#31

Post by ldj1002 » Mon Jun 01, 2015 2:16 pm

Can a TX resident with a non resident license from another state open carry in TX?


mr1337
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 1201
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:17 pm
Location: Austin

Re: 2015 Session - What Was Sent to the Governor?

#32

Post by mr1337 » Mon Jun 01, 2015 2:22 pm

ldj1002 wrote:Can a TX resident with a non resident license from another state open carry in TX?
Yes, as long as that state's license is recognized by Texas.
Keep calm and carry.

Licensing (n.) - When government takes away your right to do something and sells it back to you.

User avatar

Teamless
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3151
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 9:51 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

Re: 2015 Session - What Was Sent to the Governor?

#33

Post by Teamless » Mon Jun 01, 2015 2:34 pm

With respect to SB273, and not posting what would otherwise not be off limits with improper 30.06, did they extend the context to include postings of places like
Pasadena Conv Center, during Gun Shows, or other such places where they post?

I know "the insurance companies" require it, at least in some cases, but does SB273 make it improper?
Houston, TX
Yankee born, but got to Texas as fast as I could! NRA / PSC / IANAL

User avatar

CleverNickname
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 649
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:36 pm

Re: 2015 Session - What Was Sent to the Governor?

#34

Post by CleverNickname » Mon Jun 01, 2015 9:31 pm

I noticed that SB273 only covers 30.06 signs. Governmental entities are free to post all the invalid 30.07 signs they want to, without anyone having recourse. This might be a good thing to fix next session.

User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 10334
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: 2015 Session - What Was Sent to the Governor?

#35

Post by jmra » Mon Jun 01, 2015 9:43 pm

CleverNickname wrote:I noticed that SB273 only covers 30.06 signs. Governmental entities are free to post all the invalid 30.07 signs they want to, without anyone having recourse. This might be a good thing to fix next session.
Didn't SB273 pass before HB910? A little difficult to address something that didn't exist at the time.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member

User avatar

CleverNickname
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 649
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:36 pm

Re: 2015 Session - What Was Sent to the Governor?

#36

Post by CleverNickname » Mon Jun 01, 2015 9:52 pm

jmra wrote:
CleverNickname wrote:I noticed that SB273 only covers 30.06 signs. Governmental entities are free to post all the invalid 30.07 signs they want to, without anyone having recourse. This might be a good thing to fix next session.
Didn't SB273 pass before HB910? A little difficult to address something that didn't exist at the time.
I'm not saying that it was intentional or that they should have necessarily forseen it. I'm just saying it should be fixed.

User avatar

Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 16998
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: 2015 Session - What Was Sent to the Governor?

#37

Post by Charles L. Cotton » Mon Jun 01, 2015 10:58 pm

CleverNickname wrote:
jmra wrote:
CleverNickname wrote:I noticed that SB273 only covers 30.06 signs. Governmental entities are free to post all the invalid 30.07 signs they want to, without anyone having recourse. This might be a good thing to fix next session.
Didn't SB273 pass before HB910? A little difficult to address something that didn't exist at the time.
I'm not saying that it was intentional or that they should have necessarily forseen it. I'm just saying it should be fixed.
If it's a problem, then it will be fixed. I suspect that governmental agencies won't push the envelope, but some might be contemptuous of the legislature. If so, then perhaps the file can go up to $25,000 per day. :shock:

Chas.
Image

User avatar

ajwakeboarder
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 558
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:06 pm
Location: Tracy, CA

Re: 2015 Session - What Was Sent to the Governor?

#38

Post by ajwakeboarder » Mon Jun 01, 2015 11:06 pm

What about lowering the penalty for carrying past 30.06 to a class C Misdemeanor?
SI VIS PACEM PARA BELLUM
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

User avatar

AJSully421
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1340
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:31 pm
Location: Benbrook / SW Fort Worth

Re: 2015 Session - What Was Sent to the Governor?

#39

Post by AJSully421 » Mon Jun 01, 2015 11:08 pm

ajwakeboarder wrote:What about lowering the penalty for carrying past 30.06 to a class C Misdemeanor?
Not a separate bill... part of HB 910, but a good catch on your part.
"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so." - Ronald Reagan, 1964

30.06 signs only make criminals and terrorists safer.

User avatar

JALLEN
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3081
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 4:11 pm
Location: Comal County

Re: 2015 Session - What Was Sent to the Governor?

#40

Post by JALLEN » Tue Jun 02, 2015 8:27 am

What has the Governor actually signed at this point?

Are the effective dates January 1, 2016 in each case?
Luckily, I have enough willpower to control the driving ambition that rages within me.

User avatar

ELB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6123
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: 2015 Session - What Was Sent to the Governor?

#41

Post by ELB » Tue Jun 02, 2015 10:04 am

JALLEN wrote:What has the Governor actually signed at this point?

Are the effective dates January 1, 2016 in each case?
In most cases 01 Sep 15. Mr 1337's post on first page of thread has links to each bill.
USAF 1982-2005
____________
The Most Interesting Texan in the World. :txflag:


The Wall
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 819
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2015 10:59 am

Re: 2015 Session - What Was Sent to the Governor?

#42

Post by The Wall » Tue Jun 02, 2015 10:25 am

This is interesting article on NFA CLEO.

http://www.theoutdoorwire.com/features/225326" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar

Glockster
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1075
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:48 am
Location: Kingwood, TX

Re: 2015 Session - What Was Sent to the Governor?

#43

Post by Glockster » Tue Jun 02, 2015 10:38 am

Any word from the Governor's office as to when he will sign (assuming he is going to of course)?
NRA Life Member
My State Rep Hubert won't tell me his position on HB560. How about yours?


locke_n_load
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 961
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:35 pm

Re: 2015 Session - What Was Sent to the Governor?

#44

Post by locke_n_load » Tue Jun 02, 2015 10:40 am

The Wall wrote:This is interesting article on NFA CLEO.

http://www.theoutdoorwire.com/features/225326" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
That article is from 2011.

BATFE did state that they were looking into removing CLEO signoff requirements after talking to some suppressor groups since trusts didn't need them, but then they doublecrossed us and went to get CLEO on ALL form 1s/4s.
"They that would give up Essential Liberty, for a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"

EDC - Glock 26 Gen IV
CHL Holder since 10/08


Tracker
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 520
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 10:51 am

Re: 2015 Session - What Was Sent to the Governor?

#45

Post by Tracker » Tue Jun 02, 2015 10:41 am

JALLEN wrote:What has the Governor actually signed at this point?

Are the effective dates January 1, 2016 in each case?
I don't think so. As I understand it Campus Carry becomes law on Sept 1, 2016, a year from this September. Open carry is lawful on Jan 1, 2016

http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlodocs/ ... 00011I.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
SECTION 6. Sections 46.03(a) and (c), Penal Code, as
amended by this Act, and Sections 46.03(j) and (k) and 46.035(l),
Penal Code, as added by this Act, apply only to an offense committed
on or after September 1, 2016. An offense committed before
September 1, 2016, is governed by the law in effect when the offense
was committed, and the former law is continued in effect for that
purpose. For purposes of this section, an offense was committed
before September 1, 2016, if any element of the offense occurred
before that date.
SECTION 7. This Act takes effect September 1, 2015.

Locked

Return to “2015 Legislative Session”