shoulder arms mfgd prior to the GCA '68

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Post Reply

Topic author
saltydog452
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 279
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 3:52 pm

shoulder arms mfgd prior to the GCA '68

#1

Post by saltydog452 »

Were these pre GCA 68 factory manufactured, then legal, shoulder arms 'grandfathered in post GCA 68 and still legal to own?

If not, how can they be legally owned by the next of kin? Its unlikely that they were transferred from grand parent to parent and now to the current generation.

Thanks,

salty
User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 7863
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: shoulder arms mfgd prior to the GCA '68

#2

Post by anygunanywhere »

saltydog452 wrote:Were these pre GCA 68 factory manufactured, then legal, shoulder arms 'grandfathered in post GCA 68 and still legal to own?

If not, how can they be legally owned by the next of kin? Its unlikely that they were transferred from grand parent to parent and now to the current generation.

Thanks,

salty
Are you asking about full auto shoulder arms or the semi auto/pump/bolt action varieties too?
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
User avatar

joe817
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 9315
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
Location: Arlington

Re: shoulder arms mfgd prior to the GCA '68

#3

Post by joe817 »

anygunanywhere wrote: Are you asking about full auto shoulder arms or the semi auto/pump/bolt action varieties too?
Good and valid question a.g.a.w.(forgive the abbreviation but your handle is too long to type. lol), but wouldn't a full auto shoulder arm come under the regulation of the National Firearms Act of 1934, instead of the GCA of 1968? I must admit my knowledge of full auto ownership is sorely lacking, but I've never had but a passing fantasy of owning one.
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 7863
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: shoulder arms mfgd prior to the GCA '68

#4

Post by anygunanywhere »

joe817 wrote:
anygunanywhere wrote: Are you asking about full auto shoulder arms or the semi auto/pump/bolt action varieties too?
Good and valid question a.g.a.w.(forgive the abbreviation but your handle is too long to type. lol), but wouldn't a full auto shoulder arm come under the regulation of the National Firearms Act of 1934, instead of the GCA of 1968? I must admit my knowledge of full auto ownership is sorely lacking, but I've never had but a passing fantasy of owning one.
You are correct.

I did not fully understand salty dog's question.

The GCA of 1968 did not affect pre-1968 long arms. I own many pre-1968 long guns, some acquired from private individuals, some purchased from FFLs.

During my days as an FFL i do not recall any ATF rules on pre-1968 long guns.

The GCA of 1968 did put restrictions on imported military arms under a "sporting purpose" clause that applied to firearms imported after the law went into effect. There were also requirements for individual serial numbers, which not all imports had.

The main focus of the 1968 GCA was to establish the FFL system, and defined whom could purchase firearms. It states that private sales within a state borders do not have to go through FFLs but sales/transfers across state lines do. Thank the GCA for the form 4473s.
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand

Topic author
saltydog452
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 279
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 3:52 pm

Re: shoulder arms mfgd prior to the GCA '68

#5

Post by saltydog452 »

OK, my bad. I don't know the difference with GCA 68, or the NFA of '34. I understand that the length issue was in the GCA '68.

The firearms are a Remington 870 and a Winchester lever action.
User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 7863
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: shoulder arms mfgd prior to the GCA '68

#6

Post by anygunanywhere »

saltydog452 wrote:OK, my bad. I don't know the difference with GCA 68, or the NFA of '34. I understand that the length issue was in the GCA '68.

The firearms are a Remington 870 and a Winchester lever action.
As long as they meet the overall and barrel length requirements they are legal.

Short-barreled rifles (SBRs)—this category includes any firearm with a buttstock and either a rifled barrel under 16" long or an overall length under 26". The overall length is measured with any folding or collapsing stocks in the extended position. The category also includes firearms which came from the factory with a buttstock that was later removed by a third party.

Short barreled shotguns (SBSs)—this category is defined similarly to SBRs, but the barrel must be under 18" or a minimum overall length under 26". and the barrel must be a smoothbore.

Do with them what you want.
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 26796
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: shoulder arms mfgd prior to the GCA '68

#7

Post by The Annoyed Man »

Are you guys thinking of the 1986 FOPA, which said:
(o)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), it shall be unlawful for any person to transfer or possess a machinegun.

(2) This subsection does not apply with respect to—

(A) a transfer to or by, or possession by or under the authority of, the United States or any department or agency thereof or a State, or a department, agency, or political subdivision thereof; or

(B) any lawful transfer or lawful possession of a machinegun that was lawfully possessed before the date this subsection takes effect.
The new law was effective May 19,1986. The net effect was to make it unlawful to transfer any fully automatic weapon manufactured after 1986...........thereby causing about a 1,000% inflation in prices for items manufactured before 1986.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

joe817
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 9315
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
Location: Arlington

Re: shoulder arms mfgd prior to the GCA '68

#8

Post by joe817 »

Not to change directions of the thread, but salty's question got me to thinking of what were the differences in the 2 laws? What I remembered was that:

1.) The NFA of 1934 banned open sales of fully automatic weapons and thus establishing the infamous $200 tax stamp, a national registry of fully automatic weapons, and the system of transferring of same.

2.) The GCA of 1968 banned catalog sales of ALL firearms categories; a system of firearms purchases through FFL's (except private sales). I know I've left out a lot of important stuff, that's important to others, but only what was a concern to me is what I remembered.

I ran across an interesting, but short article regarding the history of gun control:

"History of gun-control legislation".

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/ ... story.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And oddly enough, I find it somewhat factual.
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380

MechAg94
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1584
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:28 pm

Re: shoulder arms mfgd prior to the GCA '68

#9

Post by MechAg94 »

anygunanywhere wrote:
saltydog452 wrote:OK, my bad. I don't know the difference with GCA 68, or the NFA of '34. I understand that the length issue was in the GCA '68.

The firearms are a Remington 870 and a Winchester lever action.
As long as they meet the overall and barrel length requirements they are legal.

Short-barreled rifles (SBRs)—this category includes any firearm with a buttstock and either a rifled barrel under 16" long or an overall length under 26". The overall length is measured with any folding or collapsing stocks in the extended position. The category also includes firearms which came from the factory with a buttstock that was later removed by a third party.

Short barreled shotguns (SBSs)—this category is defined similarly to SBRs, but the barrel must be under 18" or a minimum overall length under 26". and the barrel must be a smoothbore.

Do with them what you want.
I thought short barreled rifles/shotguns were also covered under the NFA of 1934. I thought a sawed off shotgun was the subject of that one lawsuit (Miller?).
User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 7863
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: shoulder arms mfgd prior to the GCA '68

#10

Post by anygunanywhere »

MechAg94 wrote:
anygunanywhere wrote:
saltydog452 wrote:OK, my bad. I don't know the difference with GCA 68, or the NFA of '34. I understand that the length issue was in the GCA '68.

The firearms are a Remington 870 and a Winchester lever action.
As long as they meet the overall and barrel length requirements they are legal.

Short-barreled rifles (SBRs)—this category includes any firearm with a buttstock and either a rifled barrel under 16" long or an overall length under 26". The overall length is measured with any folding or collapsing stocks in the extended position. The category also includes firearms which came from the factory with a buttstock that was later removed by a third party.

Short barreled shotguns (SBSs)—this category is defined similarly to SBRs, but the barrel must be under 18" or a minimum overall length under 26". and the barrel must be a smoothbore.

Do with them what you want.
I thought short barreled rifles/shotguns were also covered under the NFA of 1934. I thought a sawed off shotgun was the subject of that one lawsuit (Miller?).
They are. The NFA made them legal with the tax stamp. If the rifle or shotgun is shorter than the lengths given they are SBRs and SBSs and must be permitted under the tax stamp.
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
User avatar

Jumping Frog
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5488
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)

Re: shoulder arms mfgd prior to the GCA '68

#11

Post by Jumping Frog »

joe817 wrote:... but wouldn't a full auto shoulder arm come under the regulation of the National Firearms Act of 1934, instead of the GCA of 1968? I must admit my knowledge of full auto ownership is sorely lacking, but I've never had but a passing fantasy of owning one.
The NFA '34 required full auto firearms (hereinafter "FAF" ) used in interstate commerce to be registered with a $200 tax stamp.

If someone owned a FAF that they purchased in Texas, for example, and they never removed it from Texas, nobody bothered with the $200 tax stamp.

The GCA '68 had two effects on FAFs. First, it made it explIcit that ALL full auto firearms had to be registered with the $200 tax stamp to be legal regardless of intrastate or interstate.

Second, it provided a 30 day amnesty period to add any previously unregistered FAFs to the registry and pay the tax stamp. If you missed that 30 window, then those unregistered FAFs could never be added to the registry and could never again be possessed legally. There were literally millions of FAF war trophies from WWI, WWII, and Korea that came home with servicemen that were suddenly illegal to possess and impossible to register.

The GCA '68 allowed newly manufactured FAFs to be registered and sold to civilians.

That is what changed with the Hughes Amendment in 1986, when the registry was frozen forever. Previously registered FAFs can be transferred.
-Just call me Bob . . . Texas Firearms Coalition, NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, and OFCC Patron member

This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
User avatar

joe817
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 9315
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
Location: Arlington

Re: shoulder arms mfgd prior to the GCA '68

#12

Post by joe817 »

Good info J.F.! Thanks! :tiphat:
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380

Topic author
saltydog452
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 279
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 3:52 pm

Re: shoulder arms mfgd prior to the GCA '68

#13

Post by saltydog452 »

Your comments are appreciated. But, I didn't mention automatic.

My bad on the GCA 68, or whatever restrictions came before of after '68.

The question was, or should have been, directed to refr to firearms that were legal in length at the time of original purchase but now is a violation. A Winchester 'Trapper' lever action, and 870 with a barrel less than 18", both factory, bought in the late 50s/early 60s then legal, now not so much. Since these came from an Estate passed down from Grndparent, to Parent, and now to current descendent. Can they be legally passed down to the next family member?

Hopefully that is a bit clearer.

salty

Rifleman55
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 109
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 9:21 pm

Re: shoulder arms mfgd prior to the GCA '68

#14

Post by Rifleman55 »

Some of the early Winchester trappers have been declared courious and relics and no longer need to be registered I doubt that the shotgun is on that list.

Topic author
saltydog452
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 279
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 3:52 pm

Re: shoulder arms mfgd prior to the GCA '68

#15

Post by saltydog452 »

Thanks for the Trapper information.

As I understand it, in the 50s-60s, 870s with 18" barrels could be bought with no legal conflict for the owner. The problem with the 18" barrel was that some LEO,s JP Courts, etc, measured the barrels at slightly less than 18". That created more than few issues for the owners. In an attempt to prevent such problems for future owners, Remington then started making the short barrels at 18.25".
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”