Mid Length vs Carbine Length Gas System
Moderator: carlson1
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 4811
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:43 am
- Location: TX
Mid Length vs Carbine Length Gas System
https://partner-mco-archive.s3.amazonaw ... 866983.pdf
Most of you probably know this stuff already, but I found it interesting and informative. Wished I known before I bought my AR so I could have gone with a mid-length instead of carbine.
Most of you probably know this stuff already, but I found it interesting and informative. Wished I known before I bought my AR so I could have gone with a mid-length instead of carbine.
Last edited by bblhd672 on Mon Jun 04, 2018 8:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The left lies about everything. Truth is a liberal value, and truth is a conservative value, but it has never been a left-wing value. People on the left say whatever advances their immediate agenda. Power is their moral lodestar; therefore, truth is always subservient to it. - Dennis Prager
Re: Mid Length vs Carbin Length Gas System
Good info!bblhd672 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 04, 2018 12:11 pm https://partner-mco-archive.s3.amazonaw ... 866983.pdf
Most of you probably know this stuff already, but I found it interesting and informative. Wished I known before I bought my AR so I could have gone with a mid-length instead of carbine.
JOIN NRA TODAY!, NRA Benefactor Life, TSRA Defender Life, Gun Owners of America Life, SAF, FPC, VCDL Member
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:16 pm
- Location: North Dallas
Re: Mid Length vs Carbin Length Gas System
It is insignificant. You will never notice any issues. Unless you buy that crappy Russian ammo with the lacquered casesbblhd672 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 04, 2018 12:11 pm https://partner-mco-archive.s3.amazonaw ... 866983.pdf
Most of you probably know this stuff already, but I found it interesting and informative. Wished I known before I bought my AR so I could have gone with a mid-length instead of carbine.
"You may all go to H3ll, and I will go to Texas." - Davy Crockett
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." - Wyatt Earp
NRA Life Member
לעולם לא תשכח
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." - Wyatt Earp
NRA Life Member
לעולם לא תשכח
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 470
- Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 5:50 pm
- Location: Copperas Cove, Texas
Re: Mid Length vs Carbin Length Gas System
Bitter Clinger, have you had problems with Russian ammo? I have personally shot several thousand rounds and have experienced no problems as have all of my friends, except for the one listed below. (Russian ammo is cheap, so can shoot more often). I have heard from others that this is an issue, but can find nobody that personally have had this issue, at least recently. One of my friends stated he had an issue about 15 years ago, as the lacquer would build up, but has not had an issue recently and now shoots it frequently. Perhaps it was from earlier lot numbers, from 10 or more years ago? Just curious if you had or seen problems recently.Bitter Clinger wrote: ↑Mon Jun 04, 2018 12:28 pmIt is insignificant. You will never notice any issues. Unless you buy that crappy Russian ammo with the lacquered casesbblhd672 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 04, 2018 12:11 pm https://partner-mco-archive.s3.amazonaw ... 866983.pdf
Most of you probably know this stuff already, but I found it interesting and informative. Wished I known before I bought my AR so I could have gone with a mid-length instead of carbine.
Unless we keep the barbarian virtues, gaining the civilized ones will be of little avail. Oversentimentality, oversoftness, washiness, and mushiness are the great dangers of this age and of this people." Teddy Roosevelt"
DEB=Daniel E Bertram
U.S. Army Retired, (Sapper). VFW Life Member.
DEB=Daniel E Bertram
U.S. Army Retired, (Sapper). VFW Life Member.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 6745
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:16 am
- Location: Hunt County
Re: Mid Length vs Carbin Length Gas System
The only real difference I can see for a mid length gas system is a dubious advantage, at best. With a middy, you can use a bayonet on your rifle. With the carbine gas system, there is just too much barrel in front of the bayonet lug, so the ring won't line up with the flash hider.
I told you it was dubious.
I told you it was dubious.
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence. - John Adams
Re: Mid Length vs Carbin Length Gas System
But I may have to make a bayonet charge. We should probably practice at the next match.Pawpaw wrote: ↑Mon Jun 04, 2018 7:58 pm The only real difference I can see for a mid length gas system is a dubious advantage, at best. With a middy, you can use a bayonet on your rifle. With the carbine gas system, there is just too much barrel in front of the bayonet lug, so the ring won't line up with the flash hider.
I told you it was dubious.
Gun control is like stopping drunk driving by making it harder for sober people to drive.
NRA Life Member
NRA Life Member
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:16 pm
- Location: North Dallas
Re: Mid Length vs Carbin Length Gas System
I only run factory new quality ammo from Federal, Lake City, IWI, etc. I have seen others experience fouling with the laquer coated cases in years past, but nothing recent.DEB wrote: ↑Mon Jun 04, 2018 12:45 pmBitter Clinger, have you had problems with Russian ammo? I have personally shot several thousand rounds and have experienced no problems as have all of my friends, except for the one listed below. (Russian ammo is cheap, so can shoot more often). I have heard from others that this is an issue, but can find nobody that personally have had this issue, at least recently. One of my friends stated he had an issue about 15 years ago, as the lacquer would build up, but has not had an issue recently and now shoots it frequently. Perhaps it was from earlier lot numbers, from 10 or more years ago? Just curious if you had or seen problems recently.Bitter Clinger wrote: ↑Mon Jun 04, 2018 12:28 pmIt is insignificant. You will never notice any issues. Unless you buy that crappy Russian ammo with the lacquered casesbblhd672 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 04, 2018 12:11 pm https://partner-mco-archive.s3.amazonaw ... 866983.pdf
Most of you probably know this stuff already, but I found it interesting and informative. Wished I known before I bought my AR so I could have gone with a mid-length instead of carbine.
"You may all go to H3ll, and I will go to Texas." - Davy Crockett
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." - Wyatt Earp
NRA Life Member
לעולם לא תשכח
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." - Wyatt Earp
NRA Life Member
לעולם לא תשכח
Re: Mid Length vs Carbine Length Gas System
Do those bolt speed difference translate into real changes in parts wear or reliability?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 26796
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
- Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
- Contact:
Re: Mid Length vs Carbin Length Gas System
I have personally helped ....or tried to help..... several shooters at Elm Fork range over the years who got stuck cases that wouldn’t extract while shooting Russian steel-cased ammo in their ARs. Only once or twice was I able to dislodge the case and extract it for the carbine’s owner. In one case, the rim was ripped completely off the case and the case body was stuck in the chamber - necessitating a trip to a gunsmith to fix it. I won’t use the stuff.DEB wrote: ↑Mon Jun 04, 2018 12:45 pmBitter Clinger, have you had problems with Russian ammo? I have personally shot several thousand rounds and have experienced no problems as have all of my friends, except for the one listed below. (Russian ammo is cheap, so can shoot more often). I have heard from others that this is an issue, but can find nobody that personally have had this issue, at least recently. One of my friends stated he had an issue about 15 years ago, as the lacquer would build up, but has not had an issue recently and now shoots it frequently. Perhaps it was from earlier lot numbers, from 10 or more years ago? Just curious if you had or seen problems recently.Bitter Clinger wrote: ↑Mon Jun 04, 2018 12:28 pmIt is insignificant. You will never notice any issues. Unless you buy that crappy Russian ammo with the lacquered casesbblhd672 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 04, 2018 12:11 pm https://partner-mco-archive.s3.amazonaw ... 866983.pdf
Most of you probably know this stuff already, but I found it interesting and informative. Wished I known before I bought my AR so I could have gone with a mid-length instead of carbine.
As the owner of both an AK and several ARs, the difference in the way they lock up, headspace, and seal under detonation is very interesting to me. I started to write a long-winded response below as to why steel cased ammo is fine in an AK and not a great idea in an AR, but it gets pretty technical, and the post dragged on. (Did anyone here realize that Kalashnikov actually copied more of the M1 Garand’s design than the German MP-43’s design as is commonly thought?) Suffice it to say that there are very good reasons why steel-cased ammo, which is just fine in an AK platform rifle, is not the best choice for an AR platform rifle - and those reasons are not just about reliability, but also about safety.
You may be saving some money, but youre playing with fire. Like I said, I won’t use the stuff. Given how much cheaper steel cased ammo costs for AR pattern rifles than brass-cased ammo, you’d think that the Pentagon would order its branches to begin using it. When youre talking about billions of rounds of ammo, the savings adds up quickly. But they don’t, and there are reasons - safety and reliability. If we issued AKs, it would be different.
The same was true when .308 was the NATO standard small arms cartridge. Other countries, armed with other rifles than M14s, produced steel-cased .308 for their militaries. Not the US....and it wasn’t just for reasons of national pride.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
Re: Mid Length vs Carbine Length Gas System
TAM,
I don't know the benefits between between 'carbine vs. mid length'?
For those of us who don't know, will you provide a thumbnail sketch??
Thanks!
I don't know the benefits between between 'carbine vs. mid length'?
For those of us who don't know, will you provide a thumbnail sketch??
Thanks!
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1534
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:41 pm
- Location: Central Texas
Re: Mid Length vs Carbine Length Gas System
Gas systems lengths from closest to chamber are pistol, carbine, mid-length, and rifle. The farther away from the chamber, the less pressure in the gas tube to cycle the bolt, which means the slower the bolt moves. The slower the bolt moves, the easier it is on parts and recoil. That's the summary.
You can also slow the bolt down with different buffer weights and springs or an adjustable gas block. Generally you want a minimum 4" of barrel length past the gas port.
You can also slow the bolt down with different buffer weights and springs or an adjustable gas block. Generally you want a minimum 4" of barrel length past the gas port.
In certain extreme situations, the law is inadequate. In order to shame its inadequacy, it is necessary to act outside the law to pursue a natural justice.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 26796
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
- Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
- Contact:
Re: Mid Length vs Carbine Length Gas System
What jason812 said.jason812 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 06, 2018 12:48 pm Gas systems lengths from closest to chamber are pistol, carbine, mid-length, and rifle. The farther away from the chamber, the less pressure in the gas tube to cycle the bolt, which means the slower the bolt moves. The slower the bolt moves, the easier it is on parts and recoil. That's the summary.
You can also slow the bolt down with different buffer weights and springs or an adjustable gas block. Generally you want a minimum 4" of barrel length past the gas port.
Some people describe the Carbine length gas system as “over-gassing” the gun, causing the bolt to cycle too fast. In practical terms, it means that the recoil will be perceived as being more abrupt. Not that AR recoil is heavy - it’s not - but it can be made smoother by altering the speed of the bolt. But like Jason said, there are other issues. I’ve never had an AR with a mid or rifle length gas system “short stroke”, where it either failed to pick up the next round, or failed to lock open on the last round. I have had it happen just a few times over the years on an AR with a carbine length gas system. (Curiously, I’ve never had it happen with a .300 Blk SBR with a pistol length gas system, but i attribute that to the much heavier bullets the gun fires.) Many people are not aware of the fact that there are different weights of buffers available, and that the buffer system can be tuned to improve performance and alter recoil perception. I have two carbine-length AR15s. One has a standard carbine length direct impingement gas system; the other has a mid-length gas piston system. The DI gun gets dirty just like any other carbine, and I did play with buffer weights to eliminate overgassing and short stroking. It is reliable, but it still has sharper recoil than the piston gun has. The gas piston gun has run like a clock from day one, and runs much cleaner. The piston gun also has a much smoother recoil impulse due to (A) proper buffer weight, (B) the added weight of the piston and drive rod in the recoil cycle, and (C) a mid-length gas system.
But really, if you have a 16” carbine and it is running well for you, I wouldn’t fool with it. Changing the length gas system would give you a slightly smoother recoil impulse, but it isn’t a dramatic improvement, and it’s not like an AR carbine has World-thumping recoil. Plus, doing so would come at a price. Barrels are expensive, not to mention the ancillary parts like a longer gas tube, etc. The only time I’ve converted an existing AR from one length of gas system to another, I was converting a lot of other things about that gun too. I converted a 16” carbine with a carbine length gas system in an 1:9 chrome-moly M4 profile barrel, to a 18” DMR/SPR with a rifle length gas system in a 1:8 stainless heavy match grade barrel. Originally it was set up to fire 55 grain bullets best. After, it was set up to fire 75-77 grain OTM best.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 26796
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
- Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
- Contact:
Re: Mid Length vs Carbine Length Gas System
Duplicate post deleted.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:16 pm
- Location: North Dallas
Re: Mid Length vs Carbine Length Gas System
I solved an "over-gassing" problem on a 7.5" bbl AR pistol by simply fitting it with a heavier buffer. Changing to a "pigtail" gas tube (ostensibly to afford some milli-seconds of added dwell time) would have been far more expensive and labor / time consuming, with no guarantee of any better results.The Annoyed Man wrote: ↑Wed Jun 06, 2018 2:31 pmWhat jason812 said.jason812 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 06, 2018 12:48 pm Gas systems lengths from closest to chamber are pistol, carbine, mid-length, and rifle. The farther away from the chamber, the less pressure in the gas tube to cycle the bolt, which means the slower the bolt moves. The slower the bolt moves, the easier it is on parts and recoil. That's the summary.
You can also slow the bolt down with different buffer weights and springs or an adjustable gas block. Generally you want a minimum 4" of barrel length past the gas port.
Some people describe the Carbine length gas system as “over-gassing” the gun, causing the bolt to cycle too fast. In practical terms, it means that the recoil will be perceived as being more abrupt. Not that AR recoil is heavy - it’s not - but it can be made smoother by altering the speed of the bolt. But like Jason said, there are other issues. I’ve never had an AR with a mid or rifle length gas system “short stroke”, where it either failed to pick up the next round, or failed to lock open on the last round. I have had it happen just a few times over the years on an AR with a carbine length gas system. (Curiously, I’ve never had it happen with a .300 Blk SBR with a pistol length gas system, but i attribute that to the much heavier bullets the gun fires.) Many people are not aware of the fact that there are different weights of buffers available, and that the buffer system can be tuned to improve performance and alter recoil perception. I have two carbine-length AR15s. One has a standard carbine length direct impingement gas system; the other has a mid-length gas piston system. The DI gun gets dirty just like any other carbine, and I did play with buffer weights to eliminate overgassing and short stroking. It is reliable, but it still has sharper recoil than the piston gun has. The gas piston gun has run like a clock from day one, and runs much cleaner. The piston gun also has a much smoother recoil impulse due to (A) proper buffer weight, (B) the added weight of the piston and drive rod in the recoil cycle, and (C) a mid-length gas system.
But really, if you have a 16” carbine and it is running well for you, I wouldn’t fool with it. Changing the length gas system would give you a slightly smoother recoil impulse, but it isn’t a dramatic improvement, and it’s not like an AR carbine has World-thumping recoil. Plus, doing so would come at a price. Barrels are expensive, not to mention the ancillary parts like a longer gas tube, etc. The only time I’ve converted an existing AR from one length of gas system to another, I was converting a lot of other things about that gun too. I converted a 16” carbine with a carbine length gas system in an 1:9 chrome-moly M4 profile barrel, to a 18” DMR/SPR with a rifle length gas system in a 1:8 stainless heavy match grade barrel. Originally it was set up to fire 55 grain bullets best. After, it was set up to fire 75-77 grain OTM best.
"You may all go to H3ll, and I will go to Texas." - Davy Crockett
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." - Wyatt Earp
NRA Life Member
לעולם לא תשכח
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." - Wyatt Earp
NRA Life Member
לעולם לא תשכח
Re: Mid Length vs Carbine Length Gas System
Thanks all.
Now, given my lack of skill in some many things, maybe my wife can explain it me, as she so often does when I wonder why this or that...
Now, given my lack of skill in some many things, maybe my wife can explain it me, as she so often does when I wonder why this or that...