Seismic Quakemaker +M ammo...

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

User avatar

Topic author
AndyC
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 10578
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 12:34 pm
Location: Garland, TX

Seismic Quakemaker +M ammo...

#1

Post by AndyC » Mon Jan 21, 2019 9:36 am

Here you go - for those who believe momentum and "knock-down power" are relevant things in SD ammo:

Image

Still, it has an interesting case similar in design to some 50-cal ammo I've seen - 2-part case that screws together.
Remember Kitty Genovese

Image

Amateurs skip safety-checks - pros don't.
Preferred Travel Agent - 72 Virgins Dating Club, Iraq
There's nothing quite like the offer of 230 grains to a man's chest to remind him of his manners

User avatar

ELB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 7198
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: Seismic Quakemaker +M ammo...

#2

Post by ELB » Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:00 am

Well, interesting. Picking up cases with a magnet is nice.

Random thoughts:

I tend to lean towards heavier ammo, but I wonder what makes this heavier than others?

Once the two-part case goes together, can it inadvertently come apart? That would be unhelpful.

And of course...price? Their website is very minimal, about three pages.

The SHOT show is in progress, I wonder if anyone will get to shoot it there?
USAF 1982-2005
____________
“The only thing more enjoyable than seeing your opponent lose an election they rigged is seeing them lose an investigation they rigged.” Author unknown but dead on the mark.

User avatar

Bitter Clinger
Banned
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2593
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 5:16 pm
Location: North Dallas

Re: Seismic Quakemaker +M ammo...

#3

Post by Bitter Clinger » Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:48 am

Need more info and data to evaluate. Energy is proportional to velocity squared so need to see numbers and some sort of ballistic gel testing results (recognizing the inherent deficiencies in gel testing but still interesting none the less IMHO).
"You may all go to H3ll, and I will go to Texas." - Davy Crockett
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is everything." - Wyatt Earp
NRA Life Member
לעולם לא תשכח

User avatar

oljames3
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3236
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 1:21 pm
Location: Elgin, Texas
Contact:

Re: Seismic Quakemaker +M ammo...

#4

Post by oljames3 » Mon Jan 21, 2019 12:03 pm

Do these come in APFSDS (Armor Piercing Fin Stabilized Discarding Sabot)?
O. Lee James, III Captain, US Army (Retired 2012), Honorable Order of St. Barbara
2/19FA, 1st Cavalry Division 73-78; 56FA BDE (Pershing) 78-81
NRA Distinguished Life Member (Disabled Vet), TSRA, NAR L1

User avatar

G26ster
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2649
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 5:28 pm
Location: DFW

Re: Seismic Quakemaker +M ammo...

#5

Post by G26ster » Mon Jan 21, 2019 12:31 pm

Seismic Quakemaker +M ammo "The Destroyer of Worlds!" :biggrinjester:

User avatar

Jusme
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5063
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:23 pm
Location: Johnson County, Texas

Re: Seismic Quakemaker +M ammo...

#6

Post by Jusme » Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:22 pm

I'm no physics expert, but I have my doubts about their claim of lower recoil due to slower burning powder. It will still require the same force to propel the bullet down the barrel. If it is too slow burning, it will be more like a flintlock, in that there is a delay between firing pin strike, and combustion. Which will not reduce the felt recoil, but slow down follow up shots. If I wanted heavier bullets, at lower speeds, I would switch from 9mm to 45 acp. I can't see this as much more than a very expensive gimmick. JMHO
Take away the Second first, and the First is gone in a second :rules: :patriot:

User avatar

JustSomeOldGuy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1192
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2015 10:49 am

Re: Seismic Quakemaker +M ammo...

#7

Post by JustSomeOldGuy » Mon Jan 21, 2019 1:53 pm

I suspect they have a bridge they want to sell me along with the ammo.......
member of the church of San Gabriel de Possenti
lay brother in the order of St. John Moses Browning
USPSA limited/single stack/revolver

User avatar

Syntyr
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1294
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 3:54 pm
Location: Houston
Contact:

Re: Seismic Quakemaker +M ammo...

#8

Post by Syntyr » Mon Jan 21, 2019 3:43 pm

oljames3 wrote:
Mon Jan 21, 2019 12:03 pm
Do these come in APFSDS (Armor Piercing Fin Stabilized Discarding Sabot)?
Ohhh in 45-70 for when the home invader tries to hide behind a brick wall!
Syntyr
Happiness is two at low eight!

User avatar

Topic author
AndyC
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 10578
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 12:34 pm
Location: Garland, TX

Re: Seismic Quakemaker +M ammo...

#9

Post by AndyC » Tue Jan 22, 2019 2:06 pm

oljames3 wrote:
Mon Jan 21, 2019 12:03 pm
Do these come in APFSDS (Armor Piercing Fin Stabilized Discarding Sabot)?
That would be right up your alley :mrgreen:
Remember Kitty Genovese

Image

Amateurs skip safety-checks - pros don't.
Preferred Travel Agent - 72 Virgins Dating Club, Iraq
There's nothing quite like the offer of 230 grains to a man's chest to remind him of his manners


Rob72
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 10:08 am
Location: Gulf Coast

Re: Seismic Quakemaker +M ammo...

#10

Post by Rob72 » Tue Jan 22, 2019 4:27 pm

I'm going to say the recoil impulse is similar to the difference between .45FMJ and .40S&W, and I'm not a huge fan of either OEM load. Against moderately insulated human beings, the mid-range (124-135 grain) loads, running 1200-1300 fps generally produce the most consistent aggression-stops, with the most hits on-target.

If you live in the upper midwest/northern states, a bit more weight and a bit more velocity may help deal with winter coats. In southern locations, lighter, faster bullets will suffice (110-120grain, 1200fps+), though the 124-135 gives a bit more "oomph!" against mid-weight barriers (auto glass, sheetrock, etc..)

I've tried the spectrum. I keep coming back to what I can apply the most of, the fastest. Big-n-slow, uber-snappy hi-vel, name-your-miracle-bullet, etc., hasn't been there yet.

User avatar

SQLGeek
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3067
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:48 am
Location: Richmond, TX

Re: Seismic Quakemaker +M ammo...

#11

Post by SQLGeek » Tue Jan 22, 2019 6:13 pm

ELB wrote:
Mon Jan 21, 2019 11:00 am
Well, interesting. Picking up cases with a magnet is nice.

Random thoughts:

I tend to lean towards heavier ammo, but I wonder what makes this heavier than others?
You don't normally see 9mm being offered above 147 gr or 45 ACP above 230 gr.

This sounds like a lot of hat and maybe a little cattle.
Psalm 91:2


surprise_i'm_armed
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 4294
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 1:16 am
Location: Shady Shores, Denton County. On the shores of Lake Lewisville. John Wayne filmed here.

Re: Seismic Quakemaker +M ammo...

#12

Post by surprise_i'm_armed » Tue Jan 22, 2019 6:41 pm

SAAMI defines +P ammo.
+P+ is NOT approved per SAAMI.

Has SAAMI actually defined "+M" and approved it?

If not, do you want to use it in your firearm?

SIA
I am a marvelous housekeeper.
Every time I leave a man I keep his house.

Zsa Zsa Gabor, 1917-2016, married 9 times, divorced 7 times.


jason812
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1259
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:41 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: Seismic Quakemaker +M ammo...

#13

Post by jason812 » Tue Jan 22, 2019 7:10 pm

surprise_i'm_armed wrote:
Tue Jan 22, 2019 6:41 pm
SAAMI defines +P ammo.
+P+ is NOT approved per SAAMI.

Has SAAMI actually defined "+M" and approved it?

If not, do you want to use it in your firearm?

SIA
I would if I didn't carry a .40 and performance tests showed it wasn't a gimmick. It will be hard to justify over HST or Gold Dots but heavier bullets usually penetrate deeper.

I would be curious to see how they perform in a carbine with extra velocity.


Greybeard
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2328
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: Denton County
Contact:

Re: Seismic Quakemaker +M ammo...

#14

Post by Greybeard » Tue Jan 22, 2019 7:41 pm

"I can't see this as much more than a very expensive gimmick."

Yep, that was my first impression. And so expensive that most people would not even shoot enough of it to know if it is reliable in their gun. Or NOT.
CHL Instructor since 1995
http://www.dentoncountysports.com" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; "A Private Palace for Pistol Proficiency"
24/7 Independent Practice Plans for local LEOs and Texas CHL holders

User avatar

ELB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 7198
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: Seismic Quakemaker +M ammo...

#15

Post by ELB » Wed Jan 23, 2019 10:18 am

SQLGeek wrote:
Tue Jan 22, 2019 6:13 pm
...
You don't normally see 9mm being offered above 147 gr or 45 ACP above 230 gr.

This sounds like a lot of hat and maybe a little cattle.
Yes I'd like to know the specific weight but I was actually wonder what material they use to make it heaver? Depleted Uranium? :mrgreen:
surprise_i'm_armed wrote:
Tue Jan 22, 2019 6:41 pm
...
If not, do you want to use it in your firearm?

SIA
I'm going to guess "some will". People load non-standard non-SAAMI cartridges all the time, with different weight bullets and more/less/different powder etc.

Would like to see the actual ballistics and a full-up FBI protocol test.

There are so many configurations of ammo available today it takes some chutzpah to jump in to the market with a new offering. I'm will to wait and see if these guys really came up with sumpin' or not.
USAF 1982-2005
____________
“The only thing more enjoyable than seeing your opponent lose an election they rigged is seeing them lose an investigation they rigged.” Author unknown but dead on the mark.

Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”