castle doctrine

What should be on the 2007 agenda for CHL's?

Moderator: Charles L. Cotton

Locked

Topic author
bj
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 8:23 pm

castle doctrine

#1

Post by bj » Wed May 24, 2006 7:20 am

do we have a castle doctrine in Texas B.J.

User avatar

seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

Re: castle doctrine

#2

Post by seamusTX » Wed May 24, 2006 7:53 am

Not explicitly.

This is part of the relevant law:
  • PC §9.32. DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF PERSON. (a) A person
    is justified in using deadly force against another:
    ...
    (2) if a reasonable person in the actor's situation would not have
    retreated; and ...
However, district attorneys rarely prosecute people for failing to retreat, especially in cases of home invasion.

There was an exceptional case. In 1996, a gentleman named Gordon Hale defended himself against an assault, and the Dallas district attorney attempted to prosecute him. The grand jury declined to issue an indictment. This was the first attempt to prosecute a CHL holder for defending himself, to my knowledge.

The NRA-ILA will try to get the Texas law amended in the next legislative session.

- Jim


Diode
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1416
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: Spring Texas

#3

Post by Diode » Wed May 24, 2006 7:56 am

Do you think Texas will get a law like the one in Florida? Where you are allowed to stand you ground anywhere your allowed to be? Not just in your "Castle"?

User avatar

seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

#4

Post by seamusTX » Wed May 24, 2006 9:49 am

I'm not placing bets one way or the other. I have little confidence in the legislature. When the time comes, I'll write to my representatives. Everyone else should do the same.

I think the hysterical objections of the Florida law have been proven false, by anyone who looks at the facts, and similar measures have passed in several other states (5 if I recall correctly).

- Jim


Diode
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1416
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: Spring Texas

#5

Post by Diode » Wed May 24, 2006 9:52 am

seamusTX wrote:I'm not placing bets one way or the other. I have little confidence in the legislature. When the time comes, I'll write to my representatives. Everyone else should do the same.

I think the hysterical objections of the Florida law have been proven false, by anyone who looks at the facts, and similar measures have passed in several other states (5 if I recall correctly).

- Jim
I would expect someone will keep us updated. :) I'll be happy to bug my Rep. as well.

User avatar

seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

#6

Post by seamusTX » Wed May 24, 2006 10:50 am

Diode wrote:I would expect someone will keep us updated. :)
You can sign up for e-mail alerts from the NRA. They remind you, maybe more than some people want.

- Jim


Diode
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1416
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: Spring Texas

#7

Post by Diode » Wed May 24, 2006 10:52 am

seamusTX wrote:
Diode wrote:I would expect someone will keep us updated. :)
You can sign up for e-mail alerts from the NRA. They remind you, maybe more than some people want.

- Jim
Yeah, I have that working.... I do get alot of them too. :)


txinvestigator
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 4331
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
Location: DFW area
Contact:

Re: castle doctrine

#8

Post by txinvestigator » Wed May 24, 2006 10:59 am

seamusTX wrote:Not explicitly.

This is part of the relevant law:
  • PC §9.32. DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF PERSON. (a) A person
    is justified in using deadly force against another:
    ...
    (2) if a reasonable person in the actor's situation would not have
    retreated; and ...
However, district attorneys rarely prosecute people for failing to retreat, especially in cases of home invasion.

There was an exceptional case. In 1996, a gentleman named Gordon Hale defended himself against an assault, and the Dallas district attorney attempted to prosecute him. The grand jury declined to issue an indictment. This was the first attempt to prosecute a CHL holder for defending himself, to my knowledge.

The NRA-ILA will try to get the Texas law amended in the next legislative session.

- Jim
You forgot part;
9.32



(b) The requirement imposed by Subsection (a)(2) does not
apply to an actor who uses force against a person who is at the time
of the use of force committing an offense of unlawful entry in the
habitation of the actor.
*CHL Instructor*


"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan

Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.


txinvestigator
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 4331
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:40 pm
Location: DFW area
Contact:

Re: castle doctrine

#9

Post by txinvestigator » Wed May 24, 2006 11:01 am

seamusTX wrote:Not explicitly.



There was an exceptional case. In 1996, a gentleman named Gordon Hale defended himself against an assault, and the Dallas district attorney attempted to prosecute him. The grand jury declined to issue an indictment. This was the first attempt to prosecute a CHL holder for defending himself, to my knowledge.

The NRA-ILA will try to get the Texas law amended in the next legislative session.

- Jim
I don't remember exactly, but I think this case was a routine referral to a Grand Jury, as is ALL deadly force cases in which a person dies.
*CHL Instructor*


"Speed is Fine, but accuracy is final"- Bill Jordan

Remember those who died, remember those who killed them.

User avatar

Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 17231
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

#10

Post by Charles L. Cotton » Wed May 24, 2006 11:10 am

Diode wrote:I would expect someone will keep us updated. :)
:thumbsup:

User avatar

seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 13551
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

Re: castle doctrine

#11

Post by seamusTX » Wed May 24, 2006 11:41 am

txinvestigator wrote:You forgot part 9.32

Yes, sir. I did. Thank you for pointing that out.

- Jim

Locked

Return to “Goals for 2007”