Page 4 of 5

Re: Exposing Progressive Corruption and Malfeasance

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 11:04 am
by mojo84
The FBI has been exposed and just announced they are reopening their investigation. Now they are going to be forced to do their job.

Re: Exposing Progressive Corruption and Malfeasance

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2016 11:18 am
by Papa_Tiger
mojo84 wrote:The FBI has been exposed and just announced they are reopening their investigation. Now they are going to be forced to do their job.
What are the odds that the investigation will be closed shortly after Queen Hillary takes the throne and the current FBI director winds up, as someone else said so eloquently, "shooting himself in the back of the head three times with a double barrel shotgun"?

Re: Exposing Progressive Corruption and Malfeasance

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 8:02 am
by mojo84
From: Ian Mandel <ian.mandel@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:19 PM
Subject: Fwd: Equal Pay - Foundation
To: Tony Carrk <tony.carrk@gmail.com>, Robert Mook <robbymook@gmail.com>


Guys - Given the story yesterday about pay equity at the State Department,
I wanted to flag something that came out of our research on pay equity at
the Foundation. There are huge discrepancies, and it wouldn't surprise me
if they went here next. See a summary below from Karuna.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Karuna Seshasai <karuna.seshasai@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:14 PM
Subject: Equal Pay - Foundation
To: Ian Mandel <ian.mandel@gmail.com>


Attached is the equal pay hit pulled from the Foundation book. Essentially
here are the key take aways:

3 out of the 11 highest paid employees of the Foundation are women.

Avg salary of the highest paid men is $294,157.50, while the avg salary of
the highest paid women is $181,576.66 ($112K difference)

Median salary of the highest paid men is $346,106, while the median salary
of the highest paid women is $185,386 ($190K difference)

Chart and citations are on the attached doc. And I included the original
2013 990, where the #s come from.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/36077

Re: Exposing Progressive Corruption and Malfeasance

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 9:41 am
by ScottDLS
Yawn....old news. Bush lied people died. No one will stop America from electing the historic first woman president. Not Lyin' Ted or Lil' Marco or another low energy Bush. :banghead:

Re: Exposing Progressive Corruption and Malfeasance

Posted: Sat Oct 29, 2016 9:45 am
by ScottDLS
On another note.... If you have a current US govt security clearance...don't go to wikileaks from your home or work computer. It may expose classified information in your browser cache, and the government will prosecute you for having access to what you don't have a "need to know". So I heard from a "friend" with a clearance who got this information from his company security department.

Of course if you are simply "careless" in your handling of the information and don't have any malicious "intent", you will be exonerated....right? :biggrinjester:

Re: Exposing Progressive Corruption and Malfeasance

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:24 am
by mojo84
Still think the debates weren't rigged? Rigged debates equals rigged election.
Earlier this month, WikiLeaks revealed to us that CNN's Donna Brazile was in cahoots with the Clinton campaign during the Democratic primary. Ahead of one of Hillary Clinton's town hall debates with Bernie Sanders, Brazile reportedly sent her team one of the questions she should expect during the evening.

It turns out there was more where that came from.

The newest round of WikiLeaks emails includes this interesting exchange between Brazile and Podesta on March 5, 2016, a day before a CNN debate in Flint, Michigan. What we read is the exact wording of a debate question about the Flint water controversy.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobr ... n-n2239498

Re: Exposing Progressive Corruption and Malfeasance

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:46 pm
by mojo84
Replicans played right into Hillary's plan and continue to cooperate with her "Pied Piper Plan".

Re: Exposing Progressive Corruption and Malfeasance

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 5:57 pm
by mojo84
Google head Eric Schmidt's secret strategic plan for the US election #PodestaEmails https://t.co/LskJODXyXn

More: http://t.co/ZUfh7WDAT5 https://t.co/llq5G9kp5V

Re: Exposing Progressive Corruption and Malfeasance

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2016 6:50 am
by mojo84
She continues to maintain different public and private positions. She has to be the most tone deaf corrupt creature alive.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/31/leake ... donations/

Re: Exposing Progressive Corruption and Malfeasance

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2016 9:50 am
by TexasJohnBoy
Ladies and Gentlemen, we may have intent.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-0 ... ose-emails

On a side note, this website drives me crazy with their ads.

Re: Exposing Progressive Corruption and Malfeasance

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:09 pm
by TexasJohnBoy

Re: Exposing Progressive Corruption and Malfeasance

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2016 11:58 am
by mojo84
Blatant corruption. #2 guy has been outed.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/em ... vADUADXAIF
From: *Peter Kadzik* <peterkadzik@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2015
Subject: Heads up
To: John Podesta <john.podesta@gmail.com>


There is a HJC oversight hearing today where the head of our Civil Division
will testify. Likely to get questions on State Department emails. Another
filing in the FOIA case went in last night or will go in this am that
indicates it will be awhile (2016) before the State Department posts the
emails.

Re: Exposing Progressive Corruption and Malfeasance

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2016 1:12 pm
by Pawpaw
AndyC wrote:
TexasJohnBoy wrote:On a side note, this website drives me crazy with their ads.
Try using Reader View in Firefox - works well.
Chrome with the Adblock Plus extension works well too. When I visited that site, it reported that it blocked 13 ads.

Re: Exposing Progressive Corruption and Malfeasance

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:54 pm
by TexasJohnBoy
Pawpaw wrote:
AndyC wrote:
TexasJohnBoy wrote:On a side note, this website drives me crazy with their ads.
Try using Reader View in Firefox - works well.
Chrome with the Adblock Plus extension works well too. When I visited that site, it reported that it blocked 13 ads.
I usually do use Adblock, it just wasn't set up because of a new computer. Another side note - for home I made something called a PiHole. Great use of a Raspberry Pi...