Re: Wish list for 2009
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:41 pm
I think it would be nice to have that clarified in the books... make it where every public entrance has to be posted.
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
That should be the requirement.KBCraig wrote:The law doesn't say any such thing. It says notice must be posted "conspicuous to the public".Russell wrote:Like was stated above, make it clear in the statutes that if a 30.06 sign is not posted on every entrance door accessible to the public, ...
There's no requirement that every door be posted.
What should, that every door be posted?bdickens wrote:That should be the requirement.KBCraig wrote:The law doesn't say any such thing. It says notice must be posted "conspicuous to the public".Russell wrote:Like was stated above, make it clear in the statutes that if a 30.06 sign is not posted on every entrance door accessible to the public, ...
There's no requirement that every door be posted.
tornado wrote:RKirby wrote:My wishes for 2009 are simple...give CHL's the right to carry anywhere that an LEO legally can, and remove the restrictions related to carrying in school buildings.
LedJedi wrote:tornado wrote:RKirby wrote:My wishes for 2009 are simple...give CHL's the right to carry anywhere that an LEO legally can, and remove the restrictions related to carrying in school buildings.
That would be great. Repeal 46.035 and simplify 46.15 by getting rid of (a)(6) and fixing (a)(4) to saylrb111 wrote:Since our governor said after the Virginia Tech shooting that "Texas CHLs should be able to carry everywhere that police can." Then quite simply our legislators need to serve it up. I think Perry would like Texas to have a "first" in this line of legislation, instead of following other state's leads.
a person who is licensed to carry a concealed handgun under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code;
Even better, make it "any person who may legally carry a concealed handgun". There are thousands of non-CHLs who legally carry concealed in Texas (like me).Bart wrote:That would be great. Repeal 46.035 and simplify 46.15 by getting rid of (a)(6) and fixing (a)(4) to saya person who is licensed to carry a concealed handgun under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code;
But what which property rights are more important? The Property rights of the car owner or the property rights of the publicly accessible parking lots. Should the parking lot owner employer have more property rights than the automobile owner? Just curious on your thought processes. My thinking is that a the privately owned car owner has more rights to privacy than the semipublic property owner has a right to access. Particularly when when it involves matters self protection. I understand that this line of reasoning opens a whole new can of worms. But if one can accept that an automobile is not only private property but not much different than real estate ( we do have titles on the them).KBCraig wrote: He brought up parking lots, and his desire for a strong parking lot bill. We talked about the challenge of getting a bill passed in Texas with the number or large international corporations who oppose it. I didn't mention that I actually oppose such a bill as a violation of property owners' rights, because we just didn't have time for an in-depth discussion.
"aim small, miss small..."DoubleJ wrote:come on parking lot bill. I'm shootin' small.
Liberty wrote:But what which property rights are more important? The Property rights of the car owner or the property rights of the publicly accessible parking lots. Should the parking lot owner employer have more property rights than the automobile owner? Just curious on your thought processes. My thinking is that a the privately owned car owner has more rights to privacy than the semipublic property owner has a right to access. Particularly when when it involves matters self protection. I understand that this line of reasoning opens a whole new can of worms. But if one can accept that an automobile is not only private property but not much different than real estate ( we do have titles on the them).