Liberty County Building - Posted
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 4136
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:01 pm
- Location: Northern DFW
Liberty County Building - Posted
I searched and didn't find this situation previously posted. Please delete if my searchers were incomplete
This situation sticks in my craw because we have a similar one in Denton County. It seems that the Attorney General's office actions are not sufficient to stop the practice in multiple places. I'm posting it because it seems like a good alternative approach to addressing the matter. How effective it might be, only time will tell. I don't know Liberty County politics at all so I have no way to judge whether the Republican group's resolution could have any impact
https://s4580.pcdn.co/wp-content/upload ... al-Res.pdf
This situation sticks in my craw because we have a similar one in Denton County. It seems that the Attorney General's office actions are not sufficient to stop the practice in multiple places. I'm posting it because it seems like a good alternative approach to addressing the matter. How effective it might be, only time will tell. I don't know Liberty County politics at all so I have no way to judge whether the Republican group's resolution could have any impact
https://s4580.pcdn.co/wp-content/upload ... al-Res.pdf
6/23-8/13/10 -51 days to plastic
Dum Spiro, Spero
Dum Spiro, Spero
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 782
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 5:33 pm
Re: Liberty County Building - Posted
Mail it as registered mail to the clerk of the Judge in the courthouse. It will be verified that way. Wait three days then upload to Ken Paxton's online submittal here: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/apps/3006/chasfm11 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 06, 2018 12:24 pm I searched and didn't find this situation previously posted. Please delete if my searchers were incomplete
This situation sticks in my craw because we have a similar one in Denton County. It seems that the Attorney General's office actions are not sufficient to stop the practice in multiple places. I'm posting it because it seems like a good alternative approach to addressing the matter. How effective it might be, only time will tell. I don't know Liberty County politics at all so I have no way to judge whether the Republican group's resolution could have any impact
https://s4580.pcdn.co/wp-content/upload ... al-Res.pdf
Good luck!
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 4136
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:01 pm
- Location: Northern DFW
Re: Liberty County Building - Posted
I'm certain that the Denton County situation was submitted to the Attorney General's office - without any relief. I have no knowledge about the Liberty County one.
6/23-8/13/10 -51 days to plastic
Dum Spiro, Spero
Dum Spiro, Spero
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 782
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 5:33 pm
Re: Liberty County Building - Posted
Neither of those counties are listed here: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/30 ... ng-letters
It is possible no one bothered to submit it. If you have the opportunity, please feel free to do so.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 4136
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:01 pm
- Location: Northern DFW
Re: Liberty County Building - Posted
Thanks for the feedback Russel. It is possible that the Denton Precinct 3 building was not submitted to the AG and I have no problem doing that. If there seems to be more than Waller County involved, perhaps the chances of a favorable ruling will improve. I'll let the Liberty folks work on their situation if they chose to do more than the resolution in my link.
6/23-8/13/10 -51 days to plastic
Dum Spiro, Spero
Dum Spiro, Spero
Re: Liberty County Building - Posted
Mmmm, sort of. Austin is actually the big rock.
I just called the OAG's office and learned a couple things. Note that the following is my summary/interpretation/deduction of what I heard. Keep in mind that the last set of Ruling Letters/Violation Letters was issued on 15 Aug 17, i.e. about a year ago.
- He didn't have exact number at hand, but in 2018 there have probably been less than five complaints filed with the OAG (and I did not ask if Denton or Liberty was among them). I believe there are a few more from the 2017 pending. Some complaints have been resolved short of an actual ruling letter (and so not posted on the website) by contacting the offending government entity soon after the complaint came in, and those entities voluntarily came into compliance (or, I presume, the complaint was not legally valid) without further official action.
- The Austin City case is the big effort right now, and it consumes a lot of resources (looks to me they have help from outside counsel as well as OAG lawyers). The OAG's case against Waller County case is also open. A lot of determinations (at least with respect to courts and court premises) may be resolved or at least strongly affected by the Austin City case. So anything to do with courthouses is "pending", and a lot of enforcement actions are being held in abatement.
- There are some other complaints that might require litigation to resolve. Because even a single case takes a lot of time and effort, they are looking at various strategies to deal with them short of litigation, but don't want to disclose that to me or anyone else at the moment.
- Depending on what happens with the Austin City case and the other potential cases, they may have some suggestions for the Legislature on how to clarify some things in the law.
If you feel strongly about an invalid sign posting, I strongly suggest you use the statutory procedure and submit a complaint to the OAG. It will go on the appropriate stack for awhile, but it will provide ammo for later, like for calculating fines or telling the Legislature how many entities are flaunting the law. For a fine to take effect, the OAG has to go through the process and issue a Violation Letter, and IIRC, it is not until 15 days after that the daily fine starts accruing. Austin will owe a bunch of money if they lose, but any building with a court in it that is completely offlimits is getting a free ride if there is no complaint on file.
Last edited by ELB on Thu Sep 06, 2018 5:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
USAF 1982-2005
____________
____________
Re: Liberty County Building - Posted
Oh, and I forgot the big news: hearing for the City of Austin will happen the week of 9/17.
Think I will cross post this in the Ruling Letters thread, since it pertains to more than just Liberty County.
Think I will cross post this in the Ruling Letters thread, since it pertains to more than just Liberty County.
Last edited by ELB on Fri Sep 07, 2018 10:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
USAF 1982-2005
____________
____________
Re: Liberty County Building - Posted
Without sounding overly harsh we need some judges to grow a pair and start sanctioning the individuals responsible for these policies for official oppression and abuse of office.
Apparently using taxpayer dollars to flagrantly violate the law isn't enough as long as there are no personal consequences being borne by those doing so.
Apparently using taxpayer dollars to flagrantly violate the law isn't enough as long as there are no personal consequences being borne by those doing so.
NRA Life Member NRA Certified Instructor RSO, CRSO,
USCCA Certified Instructor
TX LTC licensed Instructor Personal/Family Protection and Self Defense Instructor.
Without The First and Second Amendments the rest are meaningless.
USCCA Certified Instructor
TX LTC licensed Instructor Personal/Family Protection and Self Defense Instructor.
Without The First and Second Amendments the rest are meaningless.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:30 am
- Location: Hickory Creek
Re: Liberty County Building - Posted
This should be something our state reps need to fix. The cost of litigation for the state and county trying to prohibit carry is ridiculous.
There should be no prohibition for a licensed person in any government building or office with the only exception (possibly) being a courtroom in session. Not the hallway outside the courtroom, not the entire building where there is a courtroom, not the clerks office, but the actual room while court is in session. I would be okay with that restriction.
My preference is that the lege amend the law to allow LTC holders to carry anywhere LEO can carry.
There should be no prohibition for a licensed person in any government building or office with the only exception (possibly) being a courtroom in session. Not the hallway outside the courtroom, not the entire building where there is a courtroom, not the clerks office, but the actual room while court is in session. I would be okay with that restriction.
My preference is that the lege amend the law to allow LTC holders to carry anywhere LEO can carry.
NRA Life Member
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 6
- Posts: 5350
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:23 pm
- Location: Johnson County, Texas
Re: Liberty County Building - Posted
That's what I have been inundating, my reps, the Governor, and other reps, known to be pro LTC, with. There is no reason, for LTC holders, who have proven themselves, to be the most law abiding, should be unable to carry, anywhere, a LEO, can, even when they are off duty. JMHOGeekwithaGun wrote: ↑Fri Sep 07, 2018 7:04 am This should be something our state reps need to fix. The cost of litigation for the state and county trying to prohibit carry is ridiculous.
There should be no prohibition for a licensed person in any government building or office with the only exception (possibly) being a courtroom in session. Not the hallway outside the courtroom, not the entire building where there is a courtroom, not the clerks office, but the actual room while court is in session. I would be okay with that restriction.
My preference is that the lege amend the law to allow LTC holders to carry anywhere LEO can carry.
Take away the Second first, and the First is gone in a second
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 5052
- Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
- Location: DFW Area, TX
Re: Liberty County Building - Posted
GeekwithaGun wrote: ↑Fri Sep 07, 2018 7:04 am This should be something our state reps need to fix. The cost of litigation for the state and county trying to prohibit carry is ridiculous.
There should be no prohibition for a licensed person in any government building or office with the only exception (possibly) being a courtroom in session. Not the hallway outside the courtroom, not the entire building where there is a courtroom, not the clerks office, but the actual room while court is in session. I would be okay with that restriction.
My preference is that the lege amend the law to allow LTC holders to carry anywhere LEO can carry.
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 5350
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 1:21 pm
- Location: Elgin, Texas
- Contact:
Re: Liberty County Building - Posted
ScottDLS wrote: ↑Fri Sep 07, 2018 9:23 amGeekwithaGun wrote: ↑Fri Sep 07, 2018 7:04 am This should be something our state reps need to fix. The cost of litigation for the state and county trying to prohibit carry is ridiculous.
There should be no prohibition for a licensed person in any government building or office with the only exception (possibly) being a courtroom in session. Not the hallway outside the courtroom, not the entire building where there is a courtroom, not the clerks office, but the actual room while court is in session. I would be okay with that restriction.
My preference is that the lege amend the law to allow LTC holders to carry anywhere LEO can carry.
O. Lee James, III Captain, US Army (Retired 2012), Honorable Order of St. Barbara
2/19FA, 1st Cavalry Division 73-78; 56FA BDE (Pershing) 78-81
NRA, NRA Basic Pistol Shooting Instructor, Rangemaster Certified, GOA, TSRA, NAR L1
2/19FA, 1st Cavalry Division 73-78; 56FA BDE (Pershing) 78-81
NRA, NRA Basic Pistol Shooting Instructor, Rangemaster Certified, GOA, TSRA, NAR L1
Re: Liberty County Building - Posted
Cool. I just put voting for state level incumbents on pause until they resolve this. The legislature pointedly refused to create an individual cause of action for the victims of government oppression.
At the national level, I'm happy to vote for Cruz if he votes for Kavanaugh. If the Republicans delay the vote on confirmation, I'm going to delay my votes for them.
What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.
Deck the halls with nitroglycerin
Fa la la la la la la la la!
Strike a match and see who's missin'
Fa la la la la la la la la!
Fa la la la la la la la la!
Strike a match and see who's missin'
Fa la la la la la la la la!
Re: Liberty County Building - Posted
Vote for Cruz!
Yes, he's another political colonic polyp, (aren't they all - either party) but he's at least not a socialist/commie... though of late he seems energy lacking but will do something benefitting Conservatives...if he ever quits sulking and gets off his posterior.
No Cruz, you're not President, get over it and do some good.
Yes, he's another political colonic polyp, (aren't they all - either party) but he's at least not a socialist/commie... though of late he seems energy lacking but will do something benefitting Conservatives...if he ever quits sulking and gets off his posterior.
No Cruz, you're not President, get over it and do some good.