The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
The character of a man has no meaning. All of that texting was done on taxpayer time with taxpayer provided phones. But there was NO bias, just innocent little lovebirds tweeting.dale blanker wrote: ↑Sat Jul 14, 2018 10:50 pmFunny, Gohmert had that same twisted curiosity... That was another dumb thing about the hearing.
Right. And if he did it from inside a SCIF, then he is guilty of the same security clearance violations as her Marxist Filthiness. His clearances have reportedly already been pulled, but it goes to show why the FBI would not want to pursue criminal charges against the DemocRats as the FBI is guilty of the same treasoness acts as Wasserman-Shultz and Huma, the Muslim Brotherhood princess. The label "deep state" does not do justice to the severity of this conspiracy to obstruct justice and destroy our Republic.rotor wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:12 amThe character of a man has no meaning. All of that texting was done on taxpayer time with taxpayer provided phones. But there was NO bias, just innocent little lovebirds tweeting.dale blanker wrote: ↑Sat Jul 14, 2018 10:50 pmFunny, Gohmert had that same twisted curiosity... That was another dumb thing about the hearing.
The label "rogue state" is more accurate.Bitter Clinger wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:40 amRight. And if he did it from inside a SCIF, then he is guilty of the same security clearance violations as her Marxist Filthiness. His clearances have reportedly already been pulled, but it goes to show why the FBI would not want to pursue criminal charges against the DemocRats as the FBI is guilty of the same treasoness acts as Wasserman-Shultz and Huma, the Muslim Brotherhood princess. The label "deep state" does not do justice to the severity of this conspiracy to obstruct justice and destroy our Republic.rotor wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:12 amThe character of a man has no meaning. All of that texting was done on taxpayer time with taxpayer provided phones. But there was NO bias, just innocent little lovebirds tweeting.dale blanker wrote: ↑Sat Jul 14, 2018 10:50 pmFunny, Gohmert had that same twisted curiosity... That was another dumb thing about the hearing.
More silliness... There is no question about Strzok's bias.rotor wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:12 amThe character of a man has no meaning. All of that texting was done on taxpayer time with taxpayer provided phones. But there was NO bias, just innocent little lovebirds tweeting.dale blanker wrote: ↑Sat Jul 14, 2018 10:50 pmFunny, Gohmert had that same twisted curiosity... That was another dumb thing about the hearing.
WOW, Russian "spies" caught spying by American "intelligence (spies)." Wow, who would have thought spies would spy? I guess the U-2 and the SR71 were used to enhance international goodwill? And, we would never try to sway another country's election.philbo wrote: ↑Fri Jul 13, 2018 2:31 pm U.S. grand jury indicts 12 Russian spies in 2016 election hacking
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... op+News%29
It's a Mueller smokescreen:G26ster wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 12:55 pmWOW, Russian "spies" caught spying by American "intelligence (spies)." Wow, who would have thought spies would spy? I guess the U-2 and the SR71 were used to enhance international goodwill? And, we would never try to sway another country's election.philbo wrote: ↑Fri Jul 13, 2018 2:31 pm U.S. grand jury indicts 12 Russian spies in 2016 election hacking
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa- ... op+News%29
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-us- ... story.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ri ... 27961d8f0e
If there’s one thing Special Counsel Robert Mueller is exceedingly good at it is indicting Russians over whom he has zero jurisdiction. Mueller had previously indicted 13 Russian individuals and companies, and Friday he added 12 more to the list.
It’s a neat little trick – bring charges against people you’ll never get in court, therefore you’ll never have to prove them. This allows Mueller and his team to say they’re “doing something,” that the American people are getting something for the millions his investigation has cost us, while not having to actually prove anything.
What the IG report summary said and the report body said did not mesh. People are still scratching heads over that one.dale blanker wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 12:52 pmMore silliness... There is no question about Strzok's bias.rotor wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:12 amThe character of a man has no meaning. All of that texting was done on taxpayer time with taxpayer provided phones. But there was NO bias, just innocent little lovebirds tweeting.dale blanker wrote: ↑Sat Jul 14, 2018 10:50 pmFunny, Gohmert had that same twisted curiosity... That was another dumb thing about the hearing.
1. Criticism about marital loyalty? Was it a loving relationship or a stormy one???
2. How much time spent texting the girlfriend? Maybe this was done during break time or compensated with overtime???
3. Again, the question should be what did he actually do that was wrong because of his obvious bias in FBI investigations??? According to Justice Dept IG: nothing.
McEnroe said it best:
dale blanker wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 12:52 pmMore silliness... There is no question about Strzok's bias.rotor wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:12 amThe character of a man has no meaning. All of that texting was done on taxpayer time with taxpayer provided phones. But there was NO bias, just innocent little lovebirds tweeting.dale blanker wrote: ↑Sat Jul 14, 2018 10:50 pmFunny, Gohmert had that same twisted curiosity... That was another dumb thing about the hearing.
1. Criticism about marital loyalty? Was it a loving relationship or a stormy one???
2. How much time spent texting the girlfriend? Maybe this was done during break time or compensated with overtime???
3. Again, the question should be what did he actually do that was wrong because of his obvious bias in FBI investigations??? According to Justice Dept IG: nothing.
McEnroe said it best:
HRC did not go to jail and Strzok was in charge. That is enough proof for me. Seriously! By the letter of the law she was guilty. I would be put in jail for having top secret stuff on my computer especially since my clearance was only secret. You being a lefty probably being interviewed by a lefty FBI agent might get a out of jail card, pass go, collect $200. These are all by the discretion of the FBI agent. Lot's of power for biased people and the real kicker is nobody can ever prove bias was given or disprove it. Without quid pro quo there is no paper trail. But had HRC become president Strzok would have been remembered and rewarded. Strzok has a great future in human relations though. He texted over 50K messages, surely done during his "break"time. How many of us working for a corporation would still be on the payroll with that abuse of time? Perhaps in his free time he was downloading porn?dale blanker wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 12:52 pmMore silliness... There is no question about Strzok's bias.rotor wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:12 amThe character of a man has no meaning. All of that texting was done on taxpayer time with taxpayer provided phones. But there was NO bias, just innocent little lovebirds tweeting.dale blanker wrote: ↑Sat Jul 14, 2018 10:50 pmFunny, Gohmert had that same twisted curiosity... That was another dumb thing about the hearing.
1. Criticism about marital loyalty? Was it a loving relationship or a stormy one???
2. How much time spent texting the girlfriend? Maybe this was done during break time or compensated with overtime???
3. Again, the question should be what did he actually do that was wrong because of his obvious bias in FBI investigations??? According to Justice Dept IG: nothing.
McEnroe said it best:
If they're not doing anything wrong, what do they have to hide? Or does that only apply when the FBI is on the other side?dale blanker wrote: ↑Sat Jul 14, 2018 12:13 pm Really???
The dumbest parts of the hearing were first of all having it ( and public, duh)
I agree, now why don't you apply a little of that logic to the present liar in chief siting in the whitehouse? Double standard much?Bitter Clinger wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 2:57 pmIf you will lie to and cheat on your wife, then you will lie and cheat on anything, including your oath to your country and its laws and the Constitution.
philbo wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 6:43 pmI agree, now why don't you apply a little of that logic to the present liar in chief siting in the whitehouse? Double standard much?Bitter Clinger wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 2:57 pmIf you will lie to and cheat on your wife, then you will lie and cheat on anything, including your oath to your country and its laws and the Constitution.
rotor wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 3:49 pmHRC did not go to jail and Strzok was in charge. That is enough proof for me. Seriously! By the letter of the law she was guilty. I would be put in jail for having top secret stuff on my computer especially since my clearance was only secret. You being a lefty probably being interviewed by a lefty FBI agent might get a out of jail card, pass go, collect $200. These are all by the discretion of the FBI agent. Lot's of power for biased people and the real kicker is nobody can ever prove bias was given or disprove it. Without quid pro quo there is no paper trail. But had HRC become president Strzok would have been remembered and rewarded. Strzok has a great future in human relations though. He texted over 50K messages, surely done during his "break"time. How many of us working for a corporation would still be on the payroll with that abuse of time? Perhaps in his free time he was downloading porn?dale blanker wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 12:52 pmMore silliness... There is no question about Strzok's bias.rotor wrote: ↑Sun Jul 15, 2018 10:12 amThe character of a man has no meaning. All of that texting was done on taxpayer time with taxpayer provided phones. But there was NO bias, just innocent little lovebirds tweeting.dale blanker wrote: ↑Sat Jul 14, 2018 10:50 pmFunny, Gohmert had that same twisted curiosity... That was another dumb thing about the hearing.
1. Criticism about marital loyalty? Was it a loving relationship or a stormy one???
2. How much time spent texting the girlfriend? Maybe this was done during break time or compensated with overtime???
3. Again, the question should be what did he actually do that was wrong because of his obvious bias in FBI investigations??? According to Justice Dept IG: nothing.
McEnroe said it best:
