deleted
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1147
- Joined: Sat Jun 07, 2014 11:22 am
- Location: Houston
Re: Judge refuses to legislate from the bench
Finally, someone in NYC has a brain!! I hope New York gets stuck with the Defendants attorneys' Fees!!
Annoy a Liberal, GET A JOB!
Re: Judge refuses to legislate from the bench
I think I've asked this question before, but here goes: If this judge or any other pretends they have the power to act like congress, why not simply ignore them?
So what if judge XYZ insists that this or that be done when they've no insistence right?
Ignore them and their non-qualified pomposity.
So what if judge XYZ insists that this or that be done when they've no insistence right?
Ignore them and their non-qualified pomposity.
Re: Judge refuses to legislate from the bench
If the judge really had a brain he would have ruled that the climate change agenda is fake science.
The left lies about everything. Truth is a liberal value, and truth is a conservative value, but it has never been a left-wing value. People on the left say whatever advances their immediate agenda. Power is their moral lodestar; therefore, truth is always subservient to it. - Dennis Prager
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 5350
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:23 pm
- Location: Johnson County, Texas
Re: Judge refuses to legislate from the bench
The problem was, the plaintiffs, didn't put "climate change" on trial. They proceeded, as if it was a decided, matter. Which then put oil companies, as "decided" contributors.
This was simply a "money grab" from large profitable companies. My question is, what if all of these companies, suddenly decided, the plaintiffs, were correct, and then ceased all oil production? How long would New York last?
Take away the Second first, and the First is gone in a second
Re: Judge refuses to legislate from the bench
Jusme,
Wouldn't it be delightful if they at least stopped distributing oil/gas in NYC, if only temporarily to see what world will be like for them without oil/gas.
So NYC, reap the results of your blanket condemnation of oil companies and see how long you last without them.
Wouldn't it be delightful if they at least stopped distributing oil/gas in NYC, if only temporarily to see what world will be like for them without oil/gas.
So NYC, reap the results of your blanket condemnation of oil companies and see how long you last without them.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 26796
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
- Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
- Contact:
Re: Judge refuses to legislate from the bench
Jusme wrote: ↑Fri Jul 20, 2018 6:55 pmThe problem was, the plaintiffs, didn't put "climate change" on trial. They proceeded, as if it was a decided, matter. Which then put oil companies, as "decided" contributors.“bblhd672” wrote: If the judge really had a brain he would have ruled that the climate change agenda is fake science.
This was simply a "money grab" from large profitable companies. My question is, what if all of these companies, suddenly decided, the plaintiffs, were correct, and then ceased all oil production? How long would New York last?
It’s not just that the plaintiffs sought to circumvent the Constitution, it’s that they did it with a blind acceptance of theory which doesn’t even include their belief paradigm. The fact is, the climate IS changing. It is the ONE constant throughout human history and even further into the past, to the days when the planet was first formed. Literally NOBODY denies it. What at least half or more of the world’s climatologists (the ONLY people whose opinions matter) DO deny is (A) that climate change is anthropogenic, and (B) that puny men can do anything to change it. Hell, we can’t even make it rain locally when we want it to, or NOT put down tornadoes locally when we don’t want them. The thought that we can globally change the climate - or stop it from changing - requires a level of hubris possessed almost exclusively by lefties - the same people who want to tell you how to run every other phase of your life, and demand the political and legal power to compel your cooperation. They are the ones who have an innate faith in totalitarianism, and believe that this time, they’ll be the ones to get it right. In other news, the sky is falling. Or not.Abraham wrote: ↑Sat Jul 21, 2018 9:33 am Jusme,
Wouldn't it be delightful if they at least stopped distributing oil/gas in NYC, if only temporarily to see what world will be like for them without oil/gas.
So NYC, reap the results of your blanket condemnation of oil companies and see how long you last without them.
My response to them is a two-word epithet advising someone to go have intimate knowledge of themselves. Leftist/progressive/collectivist thinking is a mental illness, based in a denial of reality, a denial of human nature, and a belief that you can make science say whatever you want it to say, for your own political ends, instead of what it materially says in actual fact; and the endgame of that kind of muddled thought is control over the rest of the planet’s population and their behaviors, just so that they themselves can feel some semblance of control over their own destinies. In short, they live in fear, so they have to control everyone/everything around them to hold their fear at bay. But it is a delusion. IF they ever achieve control over everyone and everything else, they’ll find that the fear they are running from comes from deep within themselves; and they will turn on each other like cornered rats. Their world view is a mental illness.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT