Growing Demand for CHL On The Rise

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: Charles L. Cotton, carlson1

Post Reply

Topic author
jerry_r60
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 404
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 6:47 pm

Growing Demand for CHL On The Rise

#1

Post by jerry_r60 » Sat Aug 18, 2018 9:19 am

From Fox this morning: Growing Demand for CHL on the Rise.

And from the article:
"Additionally, the study found that concealed handgun permit holders are extremely law-abiding—in Florida and Texas permit holders are convicted of misdemeanor and felonies at one-sixth the rate at which police officers are convicted."

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/08/18/ne ... rmits.html


RSX11
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 82
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 5:26 pm

Re: Growing Demand for CHL On The Rise

#2

Post by RSX11 » Sat Aug 18, 2018 9:28 am

permit holders are convicted of misdemeanor and felonies at one-sixth the rate at which police officers are convicted."
You hear a statistic like this pretty often, and I don't doubt that it's true. But today, it occurred to me to wonder, why it is the case? It's easy to understand that permit holders are going to be a pretty law abiding bunch - they get screened pretty carefully. But, the police are screened pretty carefully as well before being hired - so why do they wind up 6 times worse than permit holders?

User avatar

Scott B.
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1157
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:46 am
Location: Harris County

Re: Growing Demand for CHL On The Rise

#3

Post by Scott B. » Sat Aug 18, 2018 10:03 am

I think there's multiple reasons.

Varying training and hiring standards across the state. The sometimes too thin of a line between cop and criminal. Being surrounded by the worst in society day after day. Standards for reserve or part-time officers. Bad luck.

And I wouldn't look at it as 6 times worse than license holders, look at it as they're at least 6 or 7 times less likely than the general population to commit crimes. License holders are just 12 ~ 14 times less likely. :mrgreen:
LTC / SSO Instructor. NRA - Instructor, RSO, Life Member.
Sig pistol/rifle & Glock armorer | FFL 07/02 SOT

User avatar

Jusme
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 4568
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2016 4:23 pm
Location: Johnson County, Texas

Re: Growing Demand for CHL On The Rise

#4

Post by Jusme » Sat Aug 18, 2018 10:08 am

RSX11 wrote:
Sat Aug 18, 2018 9:28 am
permit holders are convicted of misdemeanor and felonies at one-sixth the rate at which police officers are convicted."
You hear a statistic like this pretty often, and I don't doubt that it's true. But today, it occurred to me to wonder, why it is the case? It's easy to understand that permit holders are going to be a pretty law abiding bunch - they get screened pretty carefully. But, the police are screened pretty carefully as well before being hired - so why do they wind up 6 times worse than permit holders?


Sometimes, it's a personality issue, they start out law abiding, and take the job to help people, but their is a certain group, that allow authority, to go to their head, and feel they can get away, with things, they wouldn't be able to, as a regular citizen. There is also, the mental aspect, in that, LEO, are exposed to a lot of grim scenarios, and are very susceptible to PTSD. Then they go home, and their significant other, doesn't understand the issues they're going through. LEO, have a high rate of alcoholism, domestic violence issues, etc. I know, I knew several LEO, that dealt, with some of those issues. There is also, the professional courtesy, whereby, a fellow LEO, will not arrest, another LEO, for infractions, and they get the idea, that they can get away with more and more serious crimes. JMHO
Take away the Second first, and the First is gone in a second :rules: :patriot:


Topic author
jerry_r60
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 404
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 6:47 pm

Re: Growing Demand for CHL On The Rise

#5

Post by jerry_r60 » Sat Aug 18, 2018 10:15 am

I hope this quote also translates to the ballot box for 2nd amendment supporters: "It also found that the number of women and minorities with permits has continued to climb."


MaduroBU
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 347
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2016 9:11 am

Re: Growing Demand for CHL On The Rise

#6

Post by MaduroBU » Sat Aug 18, 2018 11:16 am

I think that we are liking at this statistic in the wrong way. Gaining a CHL or joining the ranks of law enforcement are both rare activities; most folks are not a member of either group. But those groups offer insight into a far broader section of society.

Look at murder, a crime for which we have good statistics (at least on victims): it's an exceptionally focal problem. Visiting or living in "Chiraq" doesn't put you at risk unless you go to a select few neighborhoods. Hundreds of folks are shot and killed there every year; Obama's neighborhood has seen exactly 2 murders. YTD for 2018. That pattern of highly focal crime varies from type to type, but in general the image of a free for all in which the law of the jungle prevails is a mockery of the real state of affairs.

Put another way, the CHL statistics may point out how law abiding we are, but they also speak to how law-abiding MOST folks are. In terms of predicting the likely effect of gun control, that point cannot be over emphasized. Far and away most people who die from a gunshot wound in a given year were either a) already prohibited from having a gun or b) could've achieved their purpose with a flintlock. Gun control doesn't try to address cyclical poverty or untreated depression.

User avatar

G.A. Heath
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2738
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: Western Texas

Re: Growing Demand for CHL On The Rise

#7

Post by G.A. Heath » Sat Aug 18, 2018 11:40 am

RSX11 wrote:
Sat Aug 18, 2018 9:28 am
permit holders are convicted of misdemeanor and felonies at one-sixth the rate at which police officers are convicted."
You hear a statistic like this pretty often, and I don't doubt that it's true. But today, it occurred to me to wonder, why it is the case? It's easy to understand that permit holders are going to be a pretty law abiding bunch - they get screened pretty carefully. But, the police are screened pretty carefully as well before being hired - so why do they wind up 6 times worse than permit holders?
I suspect the main factor in the statistics for police committing more crimes than license holders is due to a number of factors. First is the fact that there are far fewer officers, so each time an officer is convicted of a crime it has far more weight from a statistical point of view. All other factors combined probably are not half as significant as this one reason alone. Consider a situation where 'group A' which has 1,000,000 members and 6 commit a crime. 'group B' has 1,000 members and 1 commits a crime. Group A has a rate of 6/1,000,000 or 0.0006% while group B has a rate of 1/1000 or 0.1%. Group B is roughly 167 times more likely to commit a crime than group A based on statistics but Group A committed 6 times as many crimes in actuality.
I am also a Gun guy, Car Guy, and Computer Guy and a currently former podcaster.


twomillenium
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1532
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2013 10:42 pm
Location: houston area

Re: Growing Demand for CHL On The Rise

#8

Post by twomillenium » Sat Aug 18, 2018 12:02 pm

RSX11 wrote:
Sat Aug 18, 2018 9:28 am
permit holders are convicted of misdemeanor and felonies at one-sixth the rate at which police officers are convicted."
You hear a statistic like this pretty often, and I don't doubt that it's true. But today, it occurred to me to wonder, why it is the case? It's easy to understand that permit holders are going to be a pretty law abiding bunch - they get screened pretty carefully. But, the police are screened pretty carefully as well before being hired - so why do they wind up 6 times worse than permit holders?
There is never an excuse for bad behavior, I suspect that some LEO confuse authority with power. Although, just a very few do this, it doesn't take many to make the vast majority suspect. Just my thoughts. The LEOs I know are not like that and it would really hurt if any that I know turned.
Texas LTC Instructor, NRA pistol instructor, RSO, NRA Endowment Life , TSRA, Glock enthusiast (tho I have others)
Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit, wisdom is knowing not to add it to a fruit salad.

You will never know another me, this could be good or not so good, but it is still true.


imkopaka
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 1:30 pm
Location: Lamesa, TX

Re: Growing Demand for CHL On The Rise

#9

Post by imkopaka » Sat Aug 18, 2018 12:29 pm

RSX11 wrote:
Sat Aug 18, 2018 9:28 am
permit holders are convicted of misdemeanor and felonies at one-sixth the rate at which police officers are convicted."
You hear a statistic like this pretty often, and I don't doubt that it's true. But today, it occurred to me to wonder, why it is the case? It's easy to understand that permit holders are going to be a pretty law abiding bunch - they get screened pretty carefully. But, the police are screened pretty carefully as well before being hired - so why do they wind up 6 times worse than permit holders?
While this is far from the only factor, I think one factor is that LEO's are more frequently placed in situations which present the opportunity to commit a crime (accidentally, even!).

For example, how many LTC holders actually draw their weapon at any point in self defense? Very few, from what we can see. So if a person never defends himself with his firearm, he can never be taken to court for manslaughter with that weapon. Now look at an LEO. How many times might the average LEO have to shoot a bad guy? Each and every time opens the possibility of a lapse in judgement (or a really skilled prosecutor, or a media lynch mob, or, or...) that leads to a manslaughter or murder charge.
G.A. Heath wrote:
Sat Aug 18, 2018 11:40 am
I suspect the main factor in the statistics for police committing more crimes than license holders is due to a number of factors. First is the fact that there are far fewer officers, so each time an officer is convicted of a crime it has far more weight from a statistical point of view. All other factors combined probably are not half as significant as this one reason alone. Consider a situation where 'group A' which has 1,000,000 members and 6 commit a crime. 'group B' has 1,000 members and 1 commits a crime. Group A has a rate of 6/1,000,000 or 0.0006% while group B has a rate of 1/1000 or 0.1%. Group B is roughly 167 times more likely to commit a crime than group A based on statistics but Group A committed 6 times as many crimes in actuality.
I disagree. Every time I've seen these statistics, they are "per capita," meaning that the actual figures are proportionally expanded or reduced to reflect what they would be if the population samples were the same size. While these figures are not exact and can be thrown off by extremely small sample sizes, there are enough LTC's and LEO's to make an accurate per capita comparison.
Never bring a knife to a gun fight.
Carry gun: Springfield XD Tactical .45

User avatar

G.A. Heath
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2738
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: Western Texas

Re: Growing Demand for CHL On The Rise

#10

Post by G.A. Heath » Sat Aug 18, 2018 12:44 pm

imkopaka wrote:
Sat Aug 18, 2018 12:29 pm
G.A. Heath wrote:
Sat Aug 18, 2018 11:40 am
I suspect the main factor in the statistics for police committing more crimes than license holders is due to a number of factors. First is the fact that there are far fewer officers, so each time an officer is convicted of a crime it has far more weight from a statistical point of view. All other factors combined probably are not half as significant as this one reason alone. Consider a situation where 'group A' which has 1,000,000 members and 6 commit a crime. 'group B' has 1,000 members and 1 commits a crime. Group A has a rate of 6/1,000,000 or 0.0006% while group B has a rate of 1/1000 or 0.1%. Group B is roughly 167 times more likely to commit a crime than group A based on statistics but Group A committed 6 times as many crimes in actuality.
I disagree. Every time I've seen these statistics, they are "per capita," meaning that the actual figures are proportionally expanded or reduced to reflect what they would be if the population samples were the same size. While these figures are not exact and can be thrown off by extremely small sample sizes, there are enough LTC's and LEO's to make an accurate per capita comparison.
So 1 in 1,000 adjusted 'per capita' means that 'group B' has a rate of 1,000 in 1,000,000 even though 'group B' committed only one crime it's crime carried roughly 167 times as much weight as each crime committed by 'group A'. I want to say that there was around 78,000 LEOs in Texas around the first of the year and 1.2 million LTCs. So each crime a LEO commits carries around 15 times the weight each crime an LTC commits.

Edited to restore everything after first sentence which I accidentally deleted prior to originally posting my reply.
I am also a Gun guy, Car Guy, and Computer Guy and a currently former podcaster.

Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”