As I have time, I'm going to go through this paper and research and evaluate their various claims. The premise is that increased carrying (what they call RTC - right to carry) in its various forms increases violent crime. Through combinations of data picking and sorting and interpreting, I don't doubt they have made the massaged data show what they want to show.
I think a question we have to come to grips with is "is bad data better than no data?". The COVID statistics we have are complete garbage - in my opinion good for absolutely nothing. Is the UCR corrupted? If it is, is it worth analyzing?
How do you make the point that urban open-air insane asylums should never be compared with areas where people are functional and rational? That's something that perhaps makes the whole exercise pointless, but I would like to not do that, and see how their methods are otherwise good or flawed.
We analyze a sample of 47 major US cities to illuminate the mechanisms that lead Right-to-Carry
concealed handgun laws to increase crime. The altered behavior of permit holders, career
criminals, and the police combine to generate 29 and 32 percent increases in firearm violent crime
and firearm robbery respectively. The increasing firearm violence is facilitated by a massive 35
percent increase in gun theft (p=0.06), with further crime stimulus flowing from diminished police
effectiveness, as reflected in a 13 percent decline in violent crime clearance rates (p=0.03). Any
crime-inhibiting benefits from increased gun carrying are swamped by the crime-stimulating
impacts.