Now isn't that special?Obama promised change but picking insiders
Clinton Redux?
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 4638
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
Clinton Redux?
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
- Location: Allen, TX
Re: Clinton Redux?
Matthew 7:15 thru 20
My grandpappy always told me that you could tell a lot about a man by those he associated with.
In bambam land we have: Wright, Rezko, Daley, Ayers, and all the other dancing bears; and his various appointees.
We're in for a hard ride folks, cinch up and put on the big spurs.
My grandpappy always told me that you could tell a lot about a man by those he associated with.
In bambam land we have: Wright, Rezko, Daley, Ayers, and all the other dancing bears; and his various appointees.
We're in for a hard ride folks, cinch up and put on the big spurs.
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365
Re: Clinton Redux?
One of BHO's apologists was on a news interview show 20 Nov 08--interviewer asked something like, "if all BHO appoints are retreads from Clinton, where's the 'change'?" (I paraphrased the question.)
Answer was something like, "we've got to have folks who know how Washington works, so we can hit the ground running." (And "rule" from day one?)
Not my idea of "change," but I didn't believe his campaign oratory anyway.
Answer was something like, "we've got to have folks who know how Washington works, so we can hit the ground running." (And "rule" from day one?)
Not my idea of "change," but I didn't believe his campaign oratory anyway.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 9:08 am
- Location: Magnolia
Re: Clinton Redux?
Nicolai wrote:One of BHO's apologists was on a news interview show 20 Nov 08--interviewer asked something like, "if all BHO appoints are retreads from Clinton, where's the 'change'?" (I paraphrased the question.)
Answer was something like, "we've got to have folks who know how Washington works, so we can hit the ground running." (And "rule" from day one?)
Not my idea of "change," but I didn't believe his campaign oratory anyway.
We do not have rulers, we have leaders who serve at our pleasure. Our last "Ruler" was King George III and the 13 Colonies fought a Revolution to throw him off.
All Communist dictators RULE. American Presidents GOVERN . We're not SUBJECTS to be RULED. We're American citizen's, and there are millions like us that are armed and will not suffer subjection to the ilk of Bill Ayers, "The Messiah and giver of all light" and his communist minions. If defending the Constitution means bloodshed, well, the tree of liberty must be watered from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Also, SUBJECTS do not have the 2nd Amendment.
A government which robs Peter to pay Paul, can always depend on the support of Paul.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 2315
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: Clinton Redux?
For those who don't think it can happen, we have had a fascist president. Woodrow Wilson had people censured and imprisoned for expression of anti-war/anti-administration sentiments. Fourth amendment rights were suspended under the broad war powers he had been granted and many homes were invaded to root out those that were potential dissidents.
Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.
I Thess 5:21
Disclaimer: IANAL, IANYL, IDNPOOTV, IDNSIAHIE and IANROFL
"There is no situation so bad that you can't make it worse." - Chris Hadfield, NASA ISS Astronaut
Disclaimer: IANAL, IANYL, IDNPOOTV, IDNSIAHIE and IANROFL
"There is no situation so bad that you can't make it worse." - Chris Hadfield, NASA ISS Astronaut
Re: Clinton Redux?
Wilson was a lightweight compared to Lincoln.Dragonfighter wrote:For those who don't think it can happen, we have had a fascist president. Woodrow Wilson had people censured and imprisoned for expression of anti-war/anti-administration sentiments. Fourth amendment rights were suspended under the broad war powers he had been granted and many homes were invaded to root out those that were potential dissidents.
Lincoln imprisoned Maryland legislators to prevent them from voting for secession. (DC would have been completely surrounded by CSA territory.) He suspended the writ of habeas corpus, and imprisoned 18,000 people who expressed sympathy for the South. He spent money without congressional approval, in direct violation of the Constitution. He threatened judges who might rule against him. He also accepted the unconstitutionally-created state of West Virginia, to give him a majority vote.
And the emancipation proclamation, for all its trumpets blaring, didn't free a single slave.
It took me a long time to come to grips with the reality of Lincoln, versus the popular myth that is taught in school. He truly was the most evil of our presidents, far worse than FDR or Wilson.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 7863
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
- Location: Richmond, Texas
Re: Clinton Redux?
He was a republican too.KBCraig wrote:Wilson was a lightweight compared to Lincoln.Dragonfighter wrote:For those who don't think it can happen, we have had a fascist president. Woodrow Wilson had people censured and imprisoned for expression of anti-war/anti-administration sentiments. Fourth amendment rights were suspended under the broad war powers he had been granted and many homes were invaded to root out those that were potential dissidents.
Lincoln imprisoned Maryland legislators to prevent them from voting for secession. (DC would have been completely surrounded by CSA territory.) He suspended the writ of habeas corpus, and imprisoned 18,000 people who expressed sympathy for the South. He spent money without congressional approval, in direct violation of the Constitution. He threatened judges who might rule against him. He also accepted the unconstitutionally-created state of West Virginia, to give him a majority vote.
And the emancipation proclamation, for all its trumpets blaring, didn't free a single slave.
It took me a long time to come to grips with the reality of Lincoln, versus the popular myth that is taught in school. He truly was the most evil of our presidents, far worse than FDR or Wilson.
Anygunanywhere
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh
"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
Re: Clinton Redux?
Grammy wins the prize (don't know what it is, though).
My previous post referenced the BHO administration wanting to hit the ground running and "rule" from day one. Regrettably, that is an actual quote from a BHO talking head on a news show last weekend.
Grammy has it exactly right--American leaders "govern."
When someone from the BHO administration-to-be says "rule," fireworks explode (not in the good way), red flags go up, and a general sense of unease travels throughout the land--at least in some portions of the land.
My previous post referenced the BHO administration wanting to hit the ground running and "rule" from day one. Regrettably, that is an actual quote from a BHO talking head on a news show last weekend.
Grammy has it exactly right--American leaders "govern."
When someone from the BHO administration-to-be says "rule," fireworks explode (not in the good way), red flags go up, and a general sense of unease travels throughout the land--at least in some portions of the land.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 2:23 pm
- Location: Deep in the Heart
- Contact:
Re: Clinton Redux?
"In every generation, there are those who want to rule well - but they mean to rule.
They promise to be good masters - but they mean to be masters." - Daniel Webster
They promise to be good masters - but they mean to be masters." - Daniel Webster
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 2315
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: Clinton Redux?
You are absolutely correct sir. The Civil War wasn't about slavery either, but federal opression of states rights and free trade in particular...the feds having added confiscatory tariffs on states' exports. Also 95% of southerners never owned a slave, Lee had freed his yet Grant's wife kept hers for years until the the SCOTUS made it outright illegal. Many of the restrictive gun laws that are on our books (prior to CHL) from the reconstruction and limiting citizen's ability to carry.KBCraig wrote:Wilson was a lightweight compared to Lincoln.Dragonfighter wrote:For those who don't think it can happen, we have had a fascist president. Woodrow Wilson had people censured and imprisoned for expression of anti-war/anti-administration sentiments. Fourth amendment rights were suspended under the broad war powers he had been granted and many homes were invaded to root out those that were potential dissidents.
I Thess 5:21
Disclaimer: IANAL, IANYL, IDNPOOTV, IDNSIAHIE and IANROFL
"There is no situation so bad that you can't make it worse." - Chris Hadfield, NASA ISS Astronaut
Disclaimer: IANAL, IANYL, IDNPOOTV, IDNSIAHIE and IANROFL
"There is no situation so bad that you can't make it worse." - Chris Hadfield, NASA ISS Astronaut
Re: Clinton Redux?
Exactly right. Unfortunately that's not what they brainwash...I mean teach in public school now days. It's no surprise things have continued down this path. One things for certain, the future ain't going to be boring.Dragonfighter wrote: You are absolutely correct sir. The Civil War wasn't about slavery either, but federal opression of states rights and free trade in particular...the feds having added confiscatory tariffs on states' exports. Also 95% of southerners never owned a slave, Lee had freed his yet Grant's wife kept hers for years until the the SCOTUS made it outright illegal. Many of the restrictive gun laws that are on our books (prior to CHL) from the reconstruction and limiting citizen's ability to carry.
"Come and Take it!" - Texans, October 2, 1835