CA Senator wants to "close the bullet button loophole"

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: Charles L. Cotton, carlson1

User avatar

Paladin
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2318
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:02 pm
Location: DFW

Re: CA Senator wants to "close the bullet button loophole"

#31

Post by Paladin » Wed Jul 18, 2018 4:54 pm

C-dub wrote:
Mon May 21, 2012 7:48 pm
I'll see your accusation that manufacturer's are circumventing the spirit of CA's law and raise you that CA's law is circumventing the spirit of the Second Amendment.
This!
NRA Endowment, TSRA Life, GOA Life Member
Texas State Guard


apostate
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2233
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 10:01 am

#32

Post by apostate » Wed Jul 18, 2018 8:00 pm

.
Last edited by apostate on Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.


jason812
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 884
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:41 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: CA Senator wants to "close the bullet button loophole"

#33

Post by jason812 » Wed Jul 18, 2018 8:37 pm

apostate wrote:
Wed Jul 18, 2018 8:00 pm
jason812 wrote:
Wed Jul 18, 2018 4:43 pm
There is at least 68,000 registered rifles with bullet buttons. The leftist can't figure out that if the AR was a legitimate problem, with at least 68,000, you would know if they were a problem.
That's the number of new registrations in California. It doesn't include ARs converted to "featureless" rifles. It doesn't include "fixed magazine" ARs employing one of the new loophole gadgets. It certainly doesn't include ARs owned by those who walk the civil disobedience path.
Most definitely. I just used the numbers provided. Unfortunately there is no telling how many US citizens are worried about the man finding their unregistered "assault weapon " and being hauled [abbreviated profanity deleted] jail. I didn't want to speculate on the number of AR's in hiding afraid they will be separated from their owners.

User avatar

Deltaboy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 905
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 9:52 pm
Location: Johnson County TX

Re: CA Senator wants to "close the bullet button loophole"

#34

Post by Deltaboy » Wed Jul 18, 2018 9:04 pm

Can we give California back to Mexico. :tiphat:
I 'm just an Ole Sinner saved by Grace and Smith & Wesson.


apostate
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2233
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 10:01 am

#35

Post by apostate » Thu Jul 19, 2018 9:39 pm

.
Last edited by apostate on Tue Sep 18, 2018 11:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.


K.Mooneyham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1741
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 4:27 pm
Location: Vernon, Texas

Re: CA Senator wants to "close the bullet button loophole"

#36

Post by K.Mooneyham » Fri Jul 20, 2018 11:17 am

apostate wrote:
Thu Jul 19, 2018 9:39 pm
jason812 wrote:
Wed Jul 18, 2018 8:37 pm
apostate wrote:
Wed Jul 18, 2018 8:00 pm
jason812 wrote:
Wed Jul 18, 2018 4:43 pm
There is at least 68,000 registered rifles with bullet buttons. The leftist can't figure out that if the AR was a legitimate problem, with at least 68,000, you would know if they were a problem.
That's the number of new registrations in California. It doesn't include ARs converted to "featureless" rifles. It doesn't include "fixed magazine" ARs employing one of the new loophole gadgets. It certainly doesn't include ARs owned by those who walk the civil disobedience path.
Most definitely. I just used the numbers provided. Unfortunately there is no telling how many US citizens are worried about the man finding their unregistered "assault weapon " and being hauled [abbreviated profanity deleted] jail. I didn't want to speculate on the number of AR's in hiding afraid they will be separated from their owners.
:thumbs2:

"Seriously y'all, if we were the problem, you'd know it."

There's another option I didn't mention above, which I'm using for my NP road trip. Before I cross into California, I'll swap out the BCG for a 22LR conversion. Rimfires aren't AW in CA. No harm, no foul.
Oh, very slick workaround. I like it. :thumbs2:

Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”