New Jersey takes it even lower

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton


Topic author
Ruark
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1046
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 8:11 pm

New Jersey takes it even lower

#1

Post by Ruark » Fri Mar 30, 2018 7:49 am

New Jersey is notorious for suffocating gun laws, which include things like requiring permits to buy firearms. Now the Democrat-dominated Senate and a Democrat governor are expected to sign more restrictions into law. They include banning any ammunition that can penetrate body armor (there goes virtually all centerfire rifle ammo), background checks for private sales, 10 round magazine limits, and confirming a "justifiable need" for concealed carry.

And so the slow creep continues. Texas firearm owners should be vigilant; remember in the last election Clinton got 44% of the Texas vote. They're definitely camping outside the back door.

cite: http://fortune.com/2018/03/27/gun-contr ... ew-jersey/
-Ruark

User avatar

ELB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6225
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: New Jersey takes it even lower

#2

Post by ELB » Fri Mar 30, 2018 12:20 pm

Teen Mob Randomly Beats Man to Death on NJ Street: Prosecutors

"Not the first time" teens have beaten someone on the street.


Gun control works!

But for who?
USAF 1982-2005
____________
The Most Interesting Texan in the World. :txflag:


rotor
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2830
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:26 pm

Re: New Jersey takes it even lower

#3

Post by rotor » Fri Mar 30, 2018 2:30 pm

I see a new industry develop in selling ammo on the east coast (underground). Bound to be highly profitable.

User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 23768
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: New Jersey takes it even lower

#4

Post by The Annoyed Man » Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:06 pm

Question..... didn’t McDonald do away with having to prove a need for carry?
Give me Liberty, or I'll get up and get it myself.—Hookalakah Meshobbab
I don't carry because of the odds, I carry because of the stakes.—The Annoyed Boy

User avatar

Flightmare
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2016 7:00 pm
Location: Plano, TX

Re: New Jersey takes it even lower

#5

Post by Flightmare » Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:20 pm

The Annoyed Man wrote:Question..... didn’t McDonald do away with having to prove a need for carry?
If that were the case, wouldn't these "may issue" states (like California) become "shall issue"?
Deplorable lunatic since 2016

User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 6904
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: La Grange, Texas

Re: New Jersey takes it even lower

#6

Post by anygunanywhere » Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:36 pm

Flightmare wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:Question..... didn’t McDonald do away with having to prove a need for carry?
If that were the case, wouldn't these "may issue" states (like California) become "shall issue"?
Since when do tyrants concern themselves about the law??
1911s should be carried openly as God and John Moses Browning (PBUH) intended them to be.
III%


strogg
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 406
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 1:51 pm
Location: DFW (Denton County)

Re: New Jersey takes it even lower

#7

Post by strogg » Fri Mar 30, 2018 3:58 pm

anygunanywhere wrote:
Flightmare wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:Question..... didn’t McDonald do away with having to prove a need for carry?
If that were the case, wouldn't these "may issue" states (like California) become "shall issue"?
Since when do tyrants concern themselves about the law??
They always do. They just do so in their deluded version of reality where facts don't matter and they rule by emotion.

User avatar

deplorable
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2017 10:06 am

Re: New Jersey takes it even lower

#8

Post by deplorable » Fri Mar 30, 2018 4:39 pm

anygunanywhere wrote:
Flightmare wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:Question..... didn’t McDonald do away with having to prove a need for carry?
If that were the case, wouldn't these "may issue" states (like California) become "shall issue"?
Since when do tyrants concern themselves about the law??
When you shoot them.

User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 6904
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: La Grange, Texas

Re: New Jersey takes it even lower

#9

Post by anygunanywhere » Fri Mar 30, 2018 5:05 pm

deplorable wrote:
anygunanywhere wrote:
Flightmare wrote:
The Annoyed Man wrote:Question..... didn’t McDonald do away with having to prove a need for carry?
If that were the case, wouldn't these "may issue" states (like California) become "shall issue"?
Since when do tyrants concern themselves about the law??
When you shoot them.
The only law tyrants should concern themselves with is in the Declaration of Independence.

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organi.zing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security
1911s should be carried openly as God and John Moses Browning (PBUH) intended them to be.
III%

User avatar

Grundy1133
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 914
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2018 2:18 pm
Location: Gainesville

Re: New Jersey takes it even lower

#10

Post by Grundy1133 » Fri Mar 30, 2018 6:57 pm

this is why im stock piling... buying up all the "high capacity" mags I can and stocking up on ammo.... if they want my guns they're gonna have a fight on their hands.
Image
NRA Member


Soccerdad1995
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 3432
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:03 pm

Re: New Jersey takes it even lower

#11

Post by Soccerdad1995 » Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:00 pm

Grundy1133 wrote:this is why im stock piling... buying up all the "high capacity" mags I can and stocking up on ammo.... if they want my guns they're gonna have a fight on their hands.
:iagree:

There are times when it is OK to let your ammo stock run low. Now is not one of those times.
Ding dong, the witch is dead

User avatar

Grundy1133
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 914
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2018 2:18 pm
Location: Gainesville

Re: New Jersey takes it even lower

#12

Post by Grundy1133 » Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:07 pm

Soccerdad1995 wrote:
Grundy1133 wrote:this is why im stock piling... buying up all the "high capacity" mags I can and stocking up on ammo.... if they want my guns they're gonna have a fight on their hands.
:iagree:

There are times when it is OK to let your ammo stock run low. Now is not one of those times.
my dad always had a huge stock pile. thats one thing he taught me. after he died my mom was going thru his things and found literally a combined total of upward of 20k rounds of 12 gauge, 7.62, 30-30,.22 LR, .22 short, 9mm, S&W .40, .357 magnum, .22 magnum, .38 special, and .410 rounds. everything from slugs to buk shot to bird shot to green tip to hollow point... he had enough ammo to supply a small armada. lol. according to some of the ammo, he had been stocking up since the 60s.
Image
NRA Member


strogg
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 406
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 1:51 pm
Location: DFW (Denton County)

Re: New Jersey takes it even lower

#13

Post by strogg » Fri Mar 30, 2018 8:17 pm

Nice. I'm not quite there yet. And of course, I'm stockpiling in the event ammo will become either scarce or prohibitively expensive. And extra magazines as spares because they are considered consumable items. That's my line to the anti-gunners, and I'm sticking with it.


abom2
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Jun 23, 2014 7:36 am

Re: New Jersey takes it even lower

#14

Post by abom2 » Fri Mar 30, 2018 9:02 pm

When planning for contingencies one might want to keep the "drones" in mind. More than just eyes and ears today. Besides all of the data mining. I do not own any tin foil.


philip964
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6246
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: New Jersey takes it even lower

#15

Post by philip964 » Fri Mar 30, 2018 9:47 pm

Grundy1133 wrote:this is why im stock piling... buying up all the "high capacity" mags I can and stocking up on ammo.... if they want my guns they're gonna have a fight on their hands.
Although I ardently support the 2nd Amendment and defend it here and on Facebook, and even though I have a LTC, I don’t have any guns or ammunition. It’s just way to scary a thing to have.

I did accidentally buy 2 ten round magazines for an fn ps90, they are for sale if some one wants them.

Then I will have nothing.

Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”