Carry Permits Jump Over 1400 Percent When DC Went ‘Shall Issue’

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
User avatar

Topic author
Paladin
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6313
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:02 pm
Location: DFW

Carry Permits Jump Over 1400 Percent When DC Went ‘Shall Issue’

#1

Post by Paladin »

article
Prior the court ruling, according to The Washington Post, only 123 people had active D.C. concealed carry permits and MPD previously denied 77 percent of applicants for not providing the once-mandated “good reason” to carry.
Next up, reciprocity?
JOIN NRA TODAY!, NRA Benefactor Life, TSRA Defender Life, Gun Owners of America Life, SAF, FPC, VCDL Member
LTC/SSC Instructor, NRA Certified Instructor, CRSO
The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. -Thomas Jefferson

Soccerdad1995
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 4337
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:03 pm

Re: Carry Permits Jump Over 1400 Percent When DC Went ‘Shall Issue’

#2

Post by Soccerdad1995 »

Paladin wrote: Wed Nov 14, 2018 1:30 pm article
Prior the court ruling, according to The Washington Post, only 123 people had active D.C. concealed carry permits and MPD previously denied 77 percent of applicants for not providing the once-mandated “good reason” to carry.
Next up, reciprocity?
I'll settle for a non-resident permit

chasfm11
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 4140
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:01 pm
Location: Northern DFW

Re: Carry Permits Jump Over 1400 Percent When DC Went ‘Shall Issue’

#3

Post by chasfm11 »

Somehow, we need the same thing to happen in NJ and MD. Both are as bad as D.C.
6/23-8/13/10 -51 days to plastic
Dum Spiro, Spero

crazy2medic
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 2453
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2015 9:59 am

Re: Carry Permits Jump Over 1400 Percent When DC Went ‘Shall Issue’

#4

Post by crazy2medic »

We need a Supreme Court ruling that strikes down all the restrictions on carrying, the reason the D.C. ruling wasn't challenged was they were afraid of that very ruling!
Government, like fire is a dangerous servant and a fearful master
If you ain't paranoid you ain't paying attention
Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war let it begin here- John Parker
User avatar

Gator Guy
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 113
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2018 1:07 pm

Re: Carry Permits Jump Over 1400 Percent When DC Went ‘Shall Issue’

#5

Post by Gator Guy »

Soccerdad1995 wrote: Wed Nov 14, 2018 1:40 pm
Paladin wrote: Wed Nov 14, 2018 1:30 pm article
Prior the court ruling, according to The Washington Post, only 123 people had active D.C. concealed carry permits and MPD previously denied 77 percent of applicants for not providing the once-mandated “good reason” to carry.
Next up, reciprocity?
I'll settle for a non-resident permit
You can get one already.
"A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned."
Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”