S&W report responds to activist investors

As the name indicates, this is the place for gun-related political discussions. It is not open to other political topics.

Moderators: Charles L. Cotton, carlson1


Scott65
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 7:43 pm

Re: S&W report responds to activist investors

#16

Post by Scott65 » Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:57 pm

Made me start thinking about a 2.0 Compact again. If it weren't for that hinged trigger... :confused5

User avatar

PriestTheRunner
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 514
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 5:33 pm

Re: S&W report responds to activist investors

#17

Post by PriestTheRunner » Thu Feb 14, 2019 9:12 am

Scott65 wrote:
Wed Feb 13, 2019 5:57 pm
Made me start thinking about a 2.0 Compact again. If it weren't for that hinged trigger... :confused5
So swap it? :cheers2:


Scott65
Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 52
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2013 7:43 pm

Re: S&W report responds to activist investors

#18

Post by Scott65 » Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:11 am

Yeah, I know... It's hard to justify. My current striker fired came with a very nice trigger. I still think S&W would be well served to cut a deal with Apex and install a great trigger at the factory...

User avatar

Topic author
Scott B.
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1268
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 11:46 am
Location: Harris County

Re: S&W report responds to activist investors

#19

Post by Scott B. » Thu Feb 14, 2019 2:09 pm

Okay, I think I'm leaning toward the 586 4" over the 686. Blued gun versus stainless.
LTC / SSC Instructor. NRA - Instructor, CRSO, Life Member.
Sig pistol/rifle & Glock armorer | FFL 07/02 SOT

Post Reply

Return to “Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues”