Trump: Banning Suppressors?

[bbhack]

To be honest, when Trump announced he was running in the primary's, I was wondering why a person who had been with the Democrats all their life would run as a Republican.

Revenge, plain and simple.

Now that Obama's legacy has been disposed of, this is funny.

[narcissist]

Yep every man can choose when and or how he dies some are brave and take charge while others run away with the rest of the sheep. Only 230 grains I was thinking bigger say 750gr.

[03Lightningrocks]

Yep every man can choose when and or how he dies some are brave and take charge while others run away with the rest of the sheep. Only 230 grains I was thinking bigger say 750gr.

Are you saying you are willing to die to keep your suppressor?

[The Annoyed Man]

Yep every man can choose when and or how he dies some are brave and take charge while others run away with the rest of the sheep. Only 230 grains I was thinking bigger say 750gr.

Are you sure this is where you want to go with this, with only five posts under your belt, and insulting a large part of the forum's membership, calling us sheep because we're willing to die in a pile of brass to protect our ownership of AR15s, but not willing to die over an ACCESSORY for an AR15?

I would urge you to engage your brain BEFORE engaging your keyboard. OTH, maybe your screen name is a pretty accurate description.

[narcissist]

See they start out slow by taking away "accessories" then by the time you know it there's nothing left but a rock to throw but you can't even throw the rock because your in chains by then. I have total respect for *everyone* who is willing to protect the 2nd ammendment. A lot of people say they will stand up against tyranny but when it comes down to it we will see who will. Sorry that I only have 5 posts under my belt I guess that means something when I just joined? As far as saying I'm willing to die for a so called "accessorie" my attorney advised me not to answer that question.

[03Lightningrocks]

See they start out slow by taking away "accessories" then by the time you know it there's nothing left but a rock to throw but you can't even throw the rock because your in chains by then. I have total respect for *everyone* who is willing to protect the 2nd ammendment. A lot of people say they will stand up against tyranny but when it comes down to it we will see who will. Sorry that I only have 5 posts under my belt I guess that means something when I just joined? As far as saying I'm willing to die for a so called "accessorie" my attorney advised me not to answer that question.

I can tell you that I am no sheep but will not take up arms against the government over suppressors or the recently banned bumpstocks. I see it more as choosing my battle wisely than as being a coward.

[narcissist]

The bump stocks they were not very good as far as hitting anything with any type of accuracy. I would say the inventors name but it's against the rules, It was a ingenious idea though. Still feel it was wrong to do what they did but my understanding is no one turned any in ?? You know how i feel about the suppressors but its great to hear your not a sheep its better to be a leader or wolf this day and age. As far as the line of questioning, I'm pretty sure he is trying to just get people into trouble. Watch out answering those kinds of questions everyone!

[anygunanywhere]

What questions? Who is asking questions? What are you talking about?

[Rubicon]

To bring this back on the topic of POTUS vs Suppressors, here is a link to the petition to stop his advance against them.

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petiti ... uppressors

Naw Dawg. If the ASA supports Canterbury, their constituency deserves whatever they get from ATF.