jbirds1210 wrote:Thank you for the reviews.....they have been very interesting and helpful! That little Italian job did deliever an impressive group at 15 yards!
I could have only done that with a pencil!
Jason
Yeah Jason,
It kinda of surprised me. Naturally, the Beretta was easier to sight with...because of the longer barrel, and there is just "more gun" to get your hands around. But I didn't expect it to outperform the others to the degree that it did.
It is a very "soft" shooting pistol as well.
It gets high marks for ease of disassembly too. If you can't take this pistol apart and put it back together, then you really shouldn't be carrying one.
Anyway, I just thought I'd post how they shot with WWB. The real test will be with the personal defense ammo.
Also, I wasn't really trying to write a review of these weapons....or suggest that "my outing" with them is indicative of the accuracy level you can expect. I am sure there are any number of folks here that can hold a pistol more steady than I can.
The purpose of the testing was to see how "reliable" each of the weapons were. Albeit, 50 rounds through each is hardly "telling", but I'll bet they will continue to be reliable for quite some time. None of the work I did on them would affect accuracy one way or the other.
It is a small amount of effort to "deburr" and "smooth up" a pistol prior to taking it to the range. All three may have run just fine without any extra help from me, I don't know....and I never will. I always spend a little time on any new gun I get...and they always "run" when I go to shoot them.
Now....if could just go back 25 years, when my eyesight was 20/20 and my hands were steady. Its a bummer getting old.
