TexasCHLforum.com

CleverNickname wrote:

Liberty wrote:This is going to put major pressure from the voters to give them equal rights to those of outa staters.

Haha, no. If a majority of the voters wanted to have shall-issue licenses, then they'd already be voting that way.

Vol Texan wrote: National Reciprocity, at it's very least, would allow me to drive through the communist state of New Jersey on the way to Vermont without fear of getting thrown in the slammer.

I'd be willing to bet that if reciprocity passed, many/most departments in may-issue states would have a policy that anyone carrying under a license from another state be arrested. They're going to want a test case to try and get the law overturned.

Say national reciprocity passes, who will enforce the new federal law? Heck, we can't even get our own state laws enforced, see http://www.texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=87351

chuck j wrote:Keep the Federal government out of our business . They are already intrusive enough . The Feds will only make a mess of it . They can not be trusted .

National reciprocity sounds good but will backfire in the end . No faith on the Federal level .....none . Will come back to torment and bite you on the buttocks .

100% !!
We do not need the feds involved in states' reciprocity. This is a monumental mistake. Once they are waist deep in it they will only make the usual debacle of it and will forever have their hands in where, when and how we can carry, even in our own state. Do you really want the left helping to decide how to implement some type of national reciprocity? Come on people, think about way you are asking. You want the feds involved in this??