Search found 2 matches

by Soccerdad1995
Mon May 24, 2021 4:58 pm
Forum: General Legislative Discussions
Topic: HB 1927 (Unlicensed Carry) Signs
Replies: 10
Views: 15610

Re: HB 1927 (Unlicensed Carry) Signs

Maxwell wrote: Mon May 24, 2021 4:26 pm So, looks like the Constitutional Carry law will require a 30.05 sign for those that are not LTC, but LTC must adhere to the 30.06-3.07 signs. Nice...
If a business has 30.06/.07 signs posted, but no 30.05, then I believe anyone legally carrying a firearm can carry in that location, even if they have an LTC. Just like an off duty LEO can carry past a 30.06 sign even if that LEO has an LTC (which they would need for the GFSZA).

In other words, I don't believe that you must always be carrying under the authority of your LTC just because you are an LTC holder.

IANAL.
by Soccerdad1995
Mon May 24, 2021 12:22 pm
Forum: General Legislative Discussions
Topic: HB 1927 (Unlicensed Carry) Signs
Replies: 10
Views: 15610

Re: HB 1927 (Unlicensed Carry) Signs

There are other defenses to prosecution for VESP's and LEO's (and possibly others). I know the VESP defense would apply for 30.06 / 30.07, not sure if it applies to 30.05.

Return to “HB 1927 (Unlicensed Carry) Signs”