Nothing. If words mattered, the right of ordinary people to own and carry weapons would not be infringed by NFA in the first place.K.Mooneyham wrote: ↑Wed Jul 17, 2019 11:12 amAgain, thank you for the information. I notice that the court filing specifically uses the phrase "assault rifle" versus the more commonly used "assault weapon". So, what will happen when expert industry witnesses are called to testify as to the term "assault rifle"yakadoo wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2019 12:12 pmAccording to the filing (https://reason.com/wp-content/uploads/2 ... -FILED.pdf), the plaintiffs have standing as the heirs of one of the victims.K.Mooneyham wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2019 11:08 am
New question: what gives the plaintiff(s) standing to bring that lawsuit?
Search found 1 match
Return to “Lawsuit argues AR-15 illegal”
- Wed Jul 17, 2019 11:44 am
- Forum: General Legislative Discussions
- Topic: Lawsuit argues AR-15 illegal
- Replies: 42
- Views: 45711