TexasCHLforum.com

ELB wrote:Seems to me that if a person” qualifies” to have his firearms taken away because he is mentally unstable and/or danger to others, then it Should be the person that is confiscated, not the firearms.

And yet some people seem fine with crazy people killing with explosives or by other means, just as long as they don't use a gun.

Taking guns away from Mark Anthony Conditt would have accomplished what exactly?

Taking guns away from Shawn Grate would have accomplished what exactly?

Taking guns away from Timothy McVeigh would have accomplished what exactly?

Taking guns away from Ted Bundy would have accomplished what exactly? (Actually, didn't he have a felony record before committing most of the murders?)

The list goes on and on.