Search found 6 matches

by Charles L. Cotton
Tue Dec 18, 2018 9:31 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: BATFE: Bump-Stock-Type Devices: Notice of proposed rulemaking
Replies: 112
Views: 8627

Re: BATFE: Bump-Stock-Type Devices: Notice of proposed rulemaking

Some who claim to be Second Amendment supporters do far more damage to our issue than those who claim to be gun control supporters. Take that crap to HuffPost, CNN or any left wing group you choose. It's not going to be here one minute longer.

Chas.
by Charles L. Cotton
Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:53 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: BATFE: Bump-Stock-Type Devices: Notice of proposed rulemaking
Replies: 112
Views: 8627

Re: BATFE: Bump-Stock-Type Devices: Notice of proposed rulemaking

The Annoyed Man wrote:
Tue Dec 11, 2018 3:43 pm
Charles L. Cotton wrote:
Mon Dec 10, 2018 6:44 pm
Narrowing the focus to only bump-stocks was masterful, regardless what anyone wants to claim.

Chas.
What would have been the likely outcome if NRA had just left it alone?
A ban on all AR platform firearms. With 58 dead, almost 500 wounded and several hundred more injured trying to escape, this was an event with a political impact far greater than anything previously experienced.

Chas.
by Charles L. Cotton
Mon Dec 10, 2018 6:44 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: BATFE: Bump-Stock-Type Devices: Notice of proposed rulemaking
Replies: 112
Views: 8627

Re: BATFE: Bump-Stock-Type Devices: Notice of proposed rulemaking

bblhd672 wrote:
Mon Dec 10, 2018 5:47 pm
Charles L. Cotton wrote:
Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:13 pm
bblhd672 wrote:
Sun Dec 09, 2018 9:33 am
Scott Farkus wrote:
Sat Dec 08, 2018 11:39 pm
Now, you've got "our guy", Trump, doing something administratively that even Obama didn't think he had the legal authority to do. It's going to set a horrible precedent if it stands.
This may cost Trump votes in 2020, not necessarily votes that go to his opponents but aren’t cast at all.
You're right, it will cost him 3 or 4 votes. Again, pick your battles.

Chas.
I'm not saying I won't vote for him if he is the Republican nominee. Again, I would just like to see the evidence that bump stocks were actually used in the Las Vegas shooting, at least something more than FBI/ATF saying "trust us, we wouldn't lie."

A recent article I read said that using bump stock while shooting at the down angle from the hotel room to the concert grounds that gravity would work against the bump stock's performing as designed.

This wouldn't even be a "battle" if Trump hadn't just jumped on the gun grabbers bandwagon from the beginning of the incident.
No one outside of DC has any clue what was going on after Las Vegas. Narrowing the focus to only bump-stocks was masterful, regardless what anyone wants to claim.

Chas.
by Charles L. Cotton
Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:13 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: BATFE: Bump-Stock-Type Devices: Notice of proposed rulemaking
Replies: 112
Views: 8627

Re: BATFE: Bump-Stock-Type Devices: Notice of proposed rulemaking

bblhd672 wrote:
Sun Dec 09, 2018 9:33 am
Scott Farkus wrote:
Sat Dec 08, 2018 11:39 pm
Now, you've got "our guy", Trump, doing something administratively that even Obama didn't think he had the legal authority to do. It's going to set a horrible precedent if it stands.
This may cost Trump votes in 2020, not necessarily votes that go to his opponents but aren’t cast at all.
You're right, it will cost him 3 or 4 votes. Again, pick your battles.

Chas.
by Charles L. Cotton
Tue Dec 04, 2018 4:25 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: BATFE: Bump-Stock-Type Devices: Notice of proposed rulemaking
Replies: 112
Views: 8627

Re: BATFE: Bump-Stock-Type Devices: Notice of proposed rulemaking

One must pick one battles. I will not say more on a public forum monitored by enemies of the Second Amendment.

Chas.
by Charles L. Cotton
Mon Dec 03, 2018 10:00 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: BATFE: Bump-Stock-Type Devices: Notice of proposed rulemaking
Replies: 112
Views: 8627

Re: BATFE: Bump-Stock-Type Devices: Notice of proposed rulemaking

spectre wrote:
Fri Nov 30, 2018 12:57 pm
TreyHouston wrote:
Thu Nov 29, 2018 7:29 pm
This is very confusing!
We got NPS carry from Obama . . . :???:
Well, not really. The NPS language was added to Obama's credit card bill that he just couldn't veto.

Chas.

Return to “BATFE: Bump-Stock-Type Devices: Notice of proposed rulemaking”