HB308
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 8
- Posts: 808
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 4:58 pm
- Location: South Central Texas
HB308
I am very surprised that nobody else has posted about this bill yet!! I will post the full bill here off of the Texas Firearms Coalition website. I see that it removes pretty much most restrictions from where CHL holders can carry. (With a few exceptions I noticed, such as those listed in the Labor Code.)
I support this bill 100% if it is as I am reading it correctly! Any opinions on this bill, let's talk about it.
From https://www.texasfirearmscoalition.com/ ... tus-report" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
<EDIT>
FORMAT ERROR
>>STAND BY FOR CORRECTION
NOTE: Formatting on the website does not allow for the "Line Through" which shows the editing on the bill that shows what they want to remove, meaning we will only see what they want to keep, unless I take the time to use color coding or something to show what will be removed and or edited. I do not wish to take that much time on it, so we'll just discuss it.
I support this bill 100% if it is as I am reading it correctly! Any opinions on this bill, let's talk about it.
From https://www.texasfirearmscoalition.com/ ... tus-report" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
<EDIT>
FORMAT ERROR
>>STAND BY FOR CORRECTION
NOTE: Formatting on the website does not allow for the "Line Through" which shows the editing on the bill that shows what they want to remove, meaning we will only see what they want to keep, unless I take the time to use color coding or something to show what will be removed and or edited. I do not wish to take that much time on it, so we'll just discuss it.
Sent from Iphone: Please IGNORE any grammatical or spelling errors.
ALL of my statements are to be considered opinionated and not factual.
ALL of my statements are to be considered opinionated and not factual.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 9315
- Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 7:13 pm
- Location: Arlington
Re: HB308
Charles has already updated his thread on proposed legislation:
viewtopic.php?f=133&t=75052" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"HB308 (Springer, R, A+) Relating to the places where a person may carry a handgun if the person is licensed to carry a concealed handgun.
Impact: Removes off-limits locations currently applicable for Concealed Handgun Licensees, as set out in TPC §46.03 and §46.035.
Position on Bill: Support this excellent bill! It is arguably the most important Bill for CHL's since the passage of SB60 in 1995.
Status: Filed 11/17/14."
viewtopic.php?f=133&t=75052" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"HB308 (Springer, R, A+) Relating to the places where a person may carry a handgun if the person is licensed to carry a concealed handgun.
Impact: Removes off-limits locations currently applicable for Concealed Handgun Licensees, as set out in TPC §46.03 and §46.035.
Position on Bill: Support this excellent bill! It is arguably the most important Bill for CHL's since the passage of SB60 in 1995.
Status: Filed 11/17/14."
Diplomacy is the Art of Letting Someone Have Your Way
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
TSRA
Colt Gov't Model .380
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:36 pm
Re: HB308
I would much prefer the new section 46.15(a)(5) which reads as following:
"a person who is carrying a concealed handgun and a valid license issued under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry a concealed handgun of the same category as the handgun the person is carrying."
be changed to something like:
"a person who is licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry a concealed handgun."
This would make it more clear that a licensee is OK to carry an "illegal knife" or a club, and that they don't have to be carrying a handgun at the same time in order for it to be legal.
Also, the bill makes 46.03 not applicable to CHLs (as shown above), but it doesn't remove the current 46.03(f) which says:
"(f) It is not a defense to prosecution under this section that the actor possessed a handgun and was licensed to carry a concealed handgun under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code."
i assume the newer law would take precedence, but not removing the old text creates an opportunity for confusion.
"a person who is carrying a concealed handgun and a valid license issued under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry a concealed handgun of the same category as the handgun the person is carrying."
be changed to something like:
"a person who is licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry a concealed handgun."
This would make it more clear that a licensee is OK to carry an "illegal knife" or a club, and that they don't have to be carrying a handgun at the same time in order for it to be legal.
Also, the bill makes 46.03 not applicable to CHLs (as shown above), but it doesn't remove the current 46.03(f) which says:
"(f) It is not a defense to prosecution under this section that the actor possessed a handgun and was licensed to carry a concealed handgun under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code."
i assume the newer law would take precedence, but not removing the old text creates an opportunity for confusion.
Re: HB308
That's cause I have to do real work between reading forum posts.Charlies.Contingency wrote:I am very surprised that nobody else has posted about this bill yet!!
But based on my first quick run through it looks like it pretty much eliminated all the unlawful carrying restrictions on CHL holders except for intoxication and intentionally failing to conceal. And lowers the penalty for those from Class A to Class C Misdemeanor.
It also eliminates all the "special exemptions" for judges and prosecuting attorneys that allowed them to carry in formerly off-limits places.
There are a lot of changes with respect to security guards, but I don't know the current intersection between CHL and commissioned security guard well enough to figure out what it did. I assume it removed some more restrictions.
I am curious that there is still language about category of handguns tho.
USAF 1982-2005
____________
____________
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 3509
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 11:52 pm
- Location: Alvin
- Contact:
Re: HB308
I saw it the day it was filed. I knew that the way I read it, it looked good. I was just waiting for someone else to read it too.
~Tracy
Gun control is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about the truth ~ Colion Noir
Gun control is what you talk about when you don't want to talk about the truth ~ Colion Noir
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 8
- Posts: 808
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 4:58 pm
- Location: South Central Texas
Re: HB308
I wanted a discussion about it, to see what everybody thought about it. Specifically this bill, as his thread is running rampant with talk about other bill's, specifically open carry.joe817 wrote:Charles has already updated his thread on proposed legislation:
viewtopic.php?f=133&t=75052" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"HB308 (Springer, R, A+) Relating to the places where a person may carry a handgun if the person is licensed to carry a concealed handgun.
Impact: Removes off-limits locations currently applicable for Concealed Handgun Licensees, as set out in TPC §46.03 and §46.035.
Position on Bill: Support this excellent bill! It is arguably the most important Bill for CHL's since the passage of SB60 in 1995.
Status: Filed 11/17/14."
Sent from Iphone: Please IGNORE any grammatical or spelling errors.
ALL of my statements are to be considered opinionated and not factual.
ALL of my statements are to be considered opinionated and not factual.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 8
- Posts: 808
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 4:58 pm
- Location: South Central Texas
Re: HB308
1) Haha, very funny.ELB wrote:That's cause I have to do real work between reading forum posts.Charlies.Contingency wrote:I am very surprised that nobody else has posted about this bill yet!!
But based on my first quick run through it looks like it pretty much eliminated all the unlawful carrying restrictions on CHL holders except for intoxication and intentionally failing to conceal. And lowers the penalty for those from Class A to Class C Misdemeanor.
It also eliminates all the "special exemptions" for judges and prosecuting attorneys that allowed them to carry in formerly off-limits places.
There are a lot of changes with respect to security guards, but I don't know the current intersection between CHL and commissioned security guard well enough to figure out what it did. I assume it removed some more restrictions.
I am curious that there is still language about category of handguns tho.
2) Agreed, pretty much does that as far as I can tell.
3) Eh, I don't care too much about that, doesn't affect or bother me.
3) What are the changes that you are referencing to? I did not notice any real changes, but I may have missed a section or two and not noticed.
Sent from Iphone: Please IGNORE any grammatical or spelling errors.
ALL of my statements are to be considered opinionated and not factual.
ALL of my statements are to be considered opinionated and not factual.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 8
- Posts: 808
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 4:58 pm
- Location: South Central Texas
Re: HB308
I must agree, some of the new wording seemed overly complicated, and I believe it could have been simplified for ease of understanding.CleverNickname wrote:I would much prefer the new section 46.15(a)(5) which reads as following:
"a person who is carrying a concealed handgun and a valid license issued under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry a concealed handgun of the same category as the handgun the person is carrying."
be changed to something like:
"a person who is licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry a concealed handgun."
This would make it more clear that a licensee is OK to carry an "illegal knife" or a club, and that they don't have to be carrying a handgun at the same time in order for it to be legal.
Also, the bill makes 46.03 not applicable to CHLs (as shown above), but it doesn't remove the current 46.03(f) which says:
"(f) It is not a defense to prosecution under this section that the actor possessed a handgun and was licensed to carry a concealed handgun under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code."
i assume the newer law would take precedence, but not removing the old text creates an opportunity for confusion.
(f) - I didn't notice that, I'm going to read back over that and see what it that leads to for us.
Sent from Iphone: Please IGNORE any grammatical or spelling errors.
ALL of my statements are to be considered opinionated and not factual.
ALL of my statements are to be considered opinionated and not factual.
Re: HB308
OK, one change (page 8 in the MS Word version). Apparently I in my head I amalgamated some of the changes to DAs and Judges with security guards. Toldja it was a quick run through it. Back to work!Charlies.Contingency wrote:
3) What are the changes that you are referencing to? I did not notice any real changes, but I may have missed a section or two and not noticed.
USAF 1982-2005
____________
____________
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1000
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 3:35 pm
Re: HB308
I wonder how 308 would affect a bill for licensed OC, if 308 were to pass before licensed OC?
CHL Holder since 10/08
NRA Certified Instructor
Former LTC Instructor
NRA Certified Instructor
Former LTC Instructor
-
- Site Admin
- Posts in topic: 12
- Posts: 17787
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Re: HB308
It would have no impact, other than removing off-limits areas. The concealment requirement of TPC §46.035(a) would simply go away, so the reduction from a Class A to a Class C misdemeanor would be moot.locke_n_load wrote:I wonder how 308 would affect a bill for licensed OC, if 308 were to pass before licensed OC?
Chas.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts in topic: 12
- Posts: 17787
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Re: HB308
We don't want to mix guns with knives and run the risk of someone balking at letting people carry certain knives. This Bill is too important to lose over a Bowie knife or switch blade.CleverNickname wrote:I would much prefer the new section 46.15(a)(5) which reads as following:
"a person who is carrying a concealed handgun and a valid license issued under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry a concealed handgun of the same category as the handgun the person is carrying."
be changed to something like:
"a person who is licensed under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry a concealed handgun."
This would make it more clear that a licensee is OK to carry an "illegal knife" or a club, and that they don't have to be carrying a handgun at the same time in order for it to be legal.
Also, the bill makes 46.03 not applicable to CHLs (as shown above), but it doesn't remove the current 46.03(f) which says:
"(f) It is not a defense to prosecution under this section that the actor possessed a handgun and was licensed to carry a concealed handgun under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code."
i assume the newer law would take precedence, but not removing the old text creates an opportunity for confusion.
Chas.
-
- Site Admin
- Posts in topic: 12
- Posts: 17787
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
- Location: Friendswood, TX
- Contact:
Re: HB308
This is essentially HB3218 from the 2013 Session and there is some relatively minor clean-up to do.
Chas.
Chas.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1314
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 4:16 pm
- Location: Hockley County
- Contact:
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 4
- Posts: 1332
- Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 5:24 pm
- Location: Just west of Cool, Texas
Re: HB308
I would also like the penalty for missing a 30.06 to be a Class C.Charles L. Cotton wrote:It would have no impact, other than removing off-limits areas. The concealment requirement of TPC §46.035(a) would simply go away, so the reduction from a Class A to a Class C misdemeanor would be moot.locke_n_load wrote:I wonder how 308 would affect a bill for licensed OC, if 308 were to pass before licensed OC?
Chas.
"I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." -- James Madison