Page 1 of 3

Effective September 1

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:29 pm
by texagun
This has probably already been discussed, but as a reminder, it is effective September 1, 2009:


Concealed handgun:
HB 2730 removes DPS authority to suspend a concealed handgun license (CHL) for the holder’s failure to display the CHL to a peace officer on demand. It removes associated penalties and suspensions for the failure to display.

Re: Effective September 1

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:31 pm
by USA1
yep , its been discussed in great detail .

i'm still going to present mine to the officer as a courtesy to him or her .

Re: Effective September 1

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:35 pm
by joe817
USA1 wrote:yep , its been discussed in great detail .

i'm still going to present mine to the officer as a courtesy to him or her .
:iagree:

Re: Effective September 1

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:41 pm
by USA1
joe817 wrote:
USA1 wrote:yep , its been discussed in great detail .

i'm still going to present mine to the officer as a courtesy to him or her .
:iagree:
some of us will get more chances to "present" than others :cool:

Re: Effective September 1

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:11 am
by gwtrikenut
I agree. What is the hurt to present your CHL along with your drivers license. If you are like me, you most likely have them both in the same pocket of your wallet. All the officer is going to ask is, where is your weapon? Why would he or she ask to see it. You already have the ok to carry. And by presenting you license, will make them more relaxed. And isn't that what you want after being pulled over for speeding? :tiphat:

Re: Effective September 1

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:38 am
by texagun
The new law does not remove the requirement to display. It simply removes associated penalties and suspensions for the failure to display.

Re: Effective September 1

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:09 am
by USA1
gwtrikenut wrote:I agree. What is the hurt to present your CHL along with your drivers license. If you are like me, you most likely have them both in the same pocket of your wallet. All the officer is going to ask is, where is your weapon? Why would he or she ask to see it. You already have the ok to carry. And by presenting you license, will make them more relaxed. And isn't that what you want after being pulled over for speeding? :tiphat:
:iagree:

Re: Effective September 1

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:12 pm
by RiverCity.45
texagun wrote:The new law does not remove the requirement to display. It simply removes associated penalties and suspensions for the failure to display.
That's really an important point that some folks seem to be overlooking.

Re: Effective September 1

Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:31 am
by iratollah
It is now also a third degree felony to use a sockpuppet with malicious intent.
.
.
.
.
You think I'm kidding?
.
.
.
HB2003.

Re: Effective September 1

Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:23 am
by Liberty
RiverCity.45 wrote:
texagun wrote:The new law does not remove the requirement to display. It simply removes associated penalties and suspensions for the failure to display.
That's really an important point that some folks seem to be overlooking.
Unless I'm missing something without a penalty there is no enforcement, the law has no teeth and is therefore meaningless.
Sorta like the requirment issue CHLs in 60 days (or is it 90?)

Re: Effective September 1

Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 8:39 am
by Keith B
iratollah wrote:It is now also a third degree felony to use a sockpuppet with malicious intent.
.
.
.
.
You think I'm kidding?
.
.
.
HB2003.
OMG, Shari Lewis and Lambchop must be rolling over in their graves! :roll:

However, I don't see anything in HB 2003 that indicates what you are stating. HB 2003 was an online harassment bill. No puppets mentioned.

Re: Effective September 1

Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 8:59 am
by RiverCity.45
Liberty wrote: Unless I'm missing something without a penalty there is no enforcement, the law has no teeth and is therefore meaningless.
Sorta like the requirment issue CHLs in 60 days (or is it 90?)
I agree. It seems silly to me, too. Nonetheless, we're still required. Maybe the penalty for not showing will be a berating from the LEO.

Re: Effective September 1

Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 12:11 pm
by iratollah
Keith B wrote:OMG,Shari Lewis and Lambchop must be rolling over in their graves!

However, I don't see anything in HB 2003 that indicates what you are stating. HB 2003 was an online harassment bill. No puppets mentioned.
For the codgers here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_(Internet)

Re: Effective September 1

Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 1:01 pm
by Keith B
iratollah wrote:
Keith B wrote:OMG,Shari Lewis and Lambchop must be rolling over in their graves!

However, I don't see anything in HB 2003 that indicates what you are stating. HB 2003 was an online harassment bill. No puppets mentioned.
For the codgers here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_(Internet)
Oh, DUH! :oops:

Well, just to show how naive I am on some things, I was clueless about rainbow flags until about 6 - 7 years ago. :lol:

Re: Effective September 1

Posted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 7:48 pm
by TexasFlash
Ok, guess I'm officially a codger also...but I learned something new today thanks to Iratollah..Thanks!
(not a sockpuppet!!)
Dave
:lol: