TexasCHLforum.com

brentkhack wrote: LaserTex would you support a socialist president? We didn't get this far by those policies. I live by the trust but verify motto. More of you should try the same.

Boil down the pot and you get the roux (btw - had to ask the wife the spelling - when you make bacon and have the grease...add flour and seasonings - that is roux - add milk and stir 'til you arm falls off, that makes gravy....I don't know politics, I don't know cooking, but I know gravy). He was sworn in as the president by the Supreme Court. He was not my chice, and I don't agree with where America is going. But facts are facts and barks are barks. Grow a bigger dog . I can promise you that people MUCH hgher in money, power, agenda have looked for any and all reasons to gun (sorry the pun) the guy down, but until it is OFFICIAL, ain't nuttin' can be done. All the whining in the world just makes you look like a whooped chihuahua.

Doug

rmoraes wrote:B"H
Yeap, he got there fair and square. Let's give him a chance b4 call the "Year of Obomanation".

After 50 odd days he has had enough chances and has proved that he is without a doubt the worst individual that will ever hold office of POTUS and makes me wax nostalgic for Bill Clinton.

Anygunanywhere

Without going into the merits or lack of regarding the gun control legislation. Online petitions are not legally vaiid. They may sound good, might give you a warm and fuzzy that you have exercised a right. But at the end of the day, they mean nothing. In order for any petition to be valid, the signatures on them must be original and verifiable.

Next for a dose of reality. We have a democratic majority in the House of Representatives, which must initiate any impeachment hearing, you have better odds of winning the lottery than you do of getting an impeachment vote before the House. Second, the Senate must hold the impeachment trial. The senate is also democrat controlled. IF an impeachment vote were to go through the house, you would have better odds, of winning every state lottery there is before the senate would take up the trial.

The latest articles show there might be enought gun toting dems in both chambers to keep any radical bills from getting though. TIme will tell.

LaserTex wrote:

brentkhack wrote: LaserTex would you support a socialist president? We didn't get this far by those policies. I live by the trust but verify motto. More of you should try the same.

Boil down the pot and you get the roux (btw - had to ask the wife the spelling - when you make bacon and have the grease...add flour and seasonings - that is roux - add milk and stir 'til you arm falls off, that makes gravy....I don't know politics, I don't know cooking, but I know gravy). He was sworn in as the president by the Supreme Court. He was not my chice, and I don't agree with where America is going. But facts are facts and barks are barks. Grow a bigger dog . I can promise you that people MUCH hgher in money, power, agenda have looked for any and all reasons to gun (sorry the pun) the guy down, but until it is OFFICIAL, ain't nuttin' can be done. All the whining in the world just makes you look like a whooped chihuahua.

Doug

But you see, why do you think nothing can be done? That's why I am glad that there are those challenging his qualifications. These are the people who are looking to make it official. We need them to get the truth. If he showed us "real" proof, then I wouldn't say anything more. And that would shut all of us up. It's a win win situation.

anygunanywhere wrote:

rmoraes wrote:B"H
Yeap, he got there fair and square. Let's give him a chance b4 call the "Year of Obomanation".

After 50 odd days he has had enough chances and has proved that he is without a doubt the worst individual that will ever hold office of POTUS and makes me wax nostalgic for Bill Clinton.

Anygunanywhere

After a year in office we will all be longing for the return of Jimmy Carter

dac1842 wrote:Without going into the merits or lack of regarding the gun control legislation. Online petitions are not legally vaiid. They may sound good, might give you a warm and fuzzy that you have exercised a right. But at the end of the day, they mean nothing. In order for any petition to be valid, the signatures on them must be original and verifiable.

Next for a dose of reality. We have a democratic majority in the House of Representatives, which must initiate any impeachment hearing, you have better odds of winning the lottery than you do of getting an impeachment vote before the House. Second, the Senate must hold the impeachment trial. The senate is also democrat controlled. IF an impeachment vote were to go through the house, you would have better odds, of winning every state lottery there is before the senate would take up the trial.

The latest articles show there might be enought gun toting dems in both chambers to keep any radical bills from getting though. TIme will tell.

For a real dose of reality, consider that with the Perjurer in Chief, a Republican conttrolled House BARELY got Articles of Impeachment passed, then the linguine spined Republicans of the Senate hung the House Managers out to dry. The chances of articles of impeachment coming out of THIS congress, well, let's just say you would have a better chance of hitting the MegaMillions, PowerBall, getting struck by lightening, meeting Elvis, and getting a picture of Jackie O and Bigfoot on the same day.

If it did come out that he doesn't qualify for POTUS, do you think he would have to go through the impeachment trial? I would hope it doesn't. It should be done, get the hell out of the office.

Oldgringo wrote:Y'all keep it up and once you get rid of Obama and Biden, we'll have Nancy Pelosi as POTUS. Wouldn't that be a fine kettle of fish?

Very wise, Oldgringo, wise indeed. The thought of such a thing as that makes your heart skip a beat and takes your breath away. As the old saying goes....it could be worse!

-geo

bryang wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:Y'all keep it up and once you get rid of Obama and Biden, we'll have Nancy Pelosi as POTUS. Wouldn't that be a fine kettle of fish?

Very wise, Oldgringo, wise indeed. The thought of such a thing as that makes your heart skip a beat and takes your breath away. As the old saying goes....it could be worse!

-geo

With Ann Coulter as her new VP.

Purplehood wrote:

bryang wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:Y'all keep it up and once you get rid of Obama and Biden, we'll have Nancy Pelosi as POTUS. Wouldn't that be a fine kettle of fish?

Very wise, Oldgringo, wise indeed. The thought of such a thing as that makes your heart skip a beat and takes your breath away. As the old saying goes....it could be worse!

-geo

With Ann Coulter as her new VP.

I am having trouble understanding your logic here. Please explain. Do you dislike Ann Coulter? I would like to see the remains of Nazi Pelosi once Ann Coulter finished with her.

Anygunanywhere

anygunanywhere wrote:

Purplehood wrote:

bryang wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:Y'all keep it up and once you get rid of Obama and Biden, we'll have Nancy Pelosi as POTUS. Wouldn't that be a fine kettle of fish?

Very wise, Oldgringo, wise indeed. The thought of such a thing as that makes your heart skip a beat and takes your breath away. As the old saying goes....it could be worse!

-geo

With Ann Coulter as her new VP.

I am having trouble understanding your logic here. Please explain. Do you dislike Ann Coulter? I would like to see the remains of Nazi Pelosi once Ann Coulter finished with her.

Anygunanywhere

Wow, did you take that wrong. The two despise each other, it was supposed to be ironic/funny.

Purplehood wrote:
Wow, did you take that wrong. The two despise each other, it was supposed to be ironic/funny.

Missed the smileys.



Anygunanywhere