The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
Texas Tribune retweeted
Morgan Smith @MorganSmith 4m4 minutes ago
#OpenCarry conference does quick work on #HB910 this afternoon: Dutton/Huffines amnd dead, according to lawmakers on committee. #txlege
arthurcw wrote:Would these be the same reporters who see and "ASSAULT WEAPON" every time a Hi-point is used?
I don't believe your rhetorical question is germane to the thread.arthurcw wrote:Would these be the same reporters who see an "ASSAULT WEAPON" every time a Hi-point is used?
That is significantly more credible than any source I've seen yet!!!LSUTiger wrote:Will HB910 pass?
http://www.ask8ball.net/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I got 2 most likely's, 1 ask again later and 1 outlook good.
Point Of Order!TVGuy wrote:I don't believe your rhetorical question is germane to the thread.arthurcw wrote:Would these be the same reporters who see an "ASSAULT WEAPON" every time a Hi-point is used?
Bud Kennedy @BudKennedy 1m1 minute ago
Sen Craig @EstesForTexas said it took a "couple of hours" to drop Dutton-Huffines amd from open-carry #HB910: It "added confusion" #txlege
Meantime, a House-Senate conference committee made short work of House Bill 910, which allows those with a concealed handgun license to openly carry a firearm in a shoulder or belt holster.
The bill will return to both houses with a major sticking point removed — an amendment, added by Sen. Don Huffines, R-Dallas, that barred law enforcement from detaining or questioning those with a holstered gun solely to check for a concealed handgun license.
“I’m disappointed,” Huffines said. “But I’m going to go along with the will of the body.”
The open carry bill could be voted on Friday in both houses.
Don't say that! Don't even think it!BigGuy wrote:Point Of Order!TVGuy wrote:I don't believe your rhetorical question is germane to the thread.arthurcw wrote:Would these be the same reporters who see an "ASSAULT WEAPON" every time a Hi-point is used?
BigGuy wrote:Point Of Order!TVGuy wrote:I don't believe your rhetorical question is germane to the thread.arthurcw wrote:Would these be the same reporters who see an "ASSAULT WEAPON" every time a Hi-point is used?
IF (I don't think they did but if) they removed the amendment, you can BET there will be one.TexasJohnBoy wrote:Don't say that! Don't even think it!BigGuy wrote: Point Of Order!
mojo84 wrote:This kind of stuff doesn't help.
http://www.bizjournals.com/austin/blog/ ... clock.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The feckless idiot could have gone along with the will of the body and pulled his amendment down while Huffman was cleaning his plow.......but he didn't. All of this lays squarely at his feet.Callaway wrote:Not sure if credible...
Chuck Lindell @chucklindell 2m2 minutes ago
Sen. @DonHuffines says he is disappointed his police-stop amendment got cut but, "I'm going to go along with the will of the body." #txlege
arthurcw wrote:IF (I don't think they did but if) they removed the amendment, you can BET there will be one.TexasJohnBoy wrote:Don't say that! Don't even think it!BigGuy wrote: Point Of Order!