Page 2 of 2

Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 11:03 pm
by srothstein
Liberty wrote:
MARCH 19, 2008
Do you have a reference so we can properly debunk or find legitimate?
Pretty hard to debunk events in future predictions, isn't it?

Posted: Wed Nov 21, 2007 11:05 pm
by srothstein
double post

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 12:57 pm
by LarryH
the "2003 Anti-Social Behavior Act"?

What's next? the "2008 Anti-burping and Anti-passing gas Act"?

Sheesh.

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 2:49 pm
by Skiprr
Liberty wrote:I can't buy this one.... This has the stench of Onion but I couldn't find it there or on a general google search. Do you have a reference so we can properly debunk or find legitimate?
It was just a joke. Pure fabrication. Sorry, guys. Maybe I shouldn't have used the "quote" thingy.

I was thinking that if the UK could start confiscating BB guns, then some of our own anti-gun Dems might find a new twist to foist onto the national agenda...like maybe trying to regulate small rocks and require licensing for your Black & Decker cordless drill.

I'll save it for April Fool's next time... :grin:

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 3:10 pm
by seamusTX
Skiprr wrote:It was just a joke. Pure fabrication.
Did you write it? It was well written. (I am a writer, so I guess I should know.)

It met the test of good satire: I tried to verify it through Google, and apparently others halfway believed it.

The closest thing to life imitating art was a suggestion that I read a couple of years ago that since many small children drown in buckets of water, buckets should be made with holes in the bottom.

- Jim

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 4:59 pm
by Skiprr
seamusTX wrote:Did you write it? It was well written.
Well, thank ya, Jim.

Actually, it seems most text I touch turns to satire. May be why I never did anything with that MA I got umpteen years ago. :???:

And if Carolyn McCarthy (et al.) takes umbrage: that little nitty was intended solely and exclusively as satire; no reasonable person should interpret it to convey true or factual material, and no disparagement or defamation of named individuals should be construed.

<cough, cough>

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 8:47 pm
by Liberty
Skiprr wrote:
Liberty wrote:I can't buy this one.... This has the stench of Onion but I couldn't find it there or on a general google search. Do you have a reference so we can properly debunk or find legitimate?
It was just a joke. Pure fabrication. Sorry, guys. Maybe I shouldn't have used the "quote" thingy.

I was thinking that if the UK could start confiscating BB guns, then some of our own anti-gun Dems might find a new twist to foist onto the national agenda...like maybe trying to regulate small rocks and require licensing for your Black & Decker cordless drill.

I'll save it for April Fool's next time... :grin:
Ya got me, was well done.I figured it was gag post, but you fooled me with the origination. Jokes and kidding aside your point was well made too.

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 9:27 pm
by mr surveyor
LarryH wrote:the "2003 Anti-Social Behavior Act"?

What's next? the "2008 Anti-burping and Anti-passing gas Act"?

Sheesh.

I believe that's all covered in the livestick flatulance studies in search of that magic cattle feed.... gotta stop green house gas emmissions you know :roll:

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 10:51 pm
by Skiprr
Liberty wrote:Ya got me, was well done. I figured it was gag post, but you fooled me with the origination. Jokes and kidding aside your point was well made too.
Thank you, Liberty.