bullseye10x wrote:Saw this local report today. Imagine you are at your favorite grocery store when at least 3 heavily armed robbers storm in and take control of the kiosk bank:
http://www.myfoxhouston.com/myfox/pa...Y&pageId=1.1.1
If you are close enough to witness this, then you're close enough to react. But what do you do? Personally, I'm not sure I'd want to engage with so many friendlies around unless it was absolutely necessary (i.e. they are obviously about to kill someone). What say the rest of you?
I have a feeling these clowns aren't going to stop until they're caught!
You are correct that the pattern will continue until the actors are caught. Still, unless you wear a badge you have no legal obligation to do anything to correct violent criminal actors other than report the facts to the police. There are obviously circumstances where one may have no choice but to get involved. However, I can't tell everyone on this board when or when not to act. It's personal choice and it is a choice that will depend on your perception of the events unfolding before you as well as your understanding of what is and isn't justified by law.
While I’m guilty of offering opinions of my own, I actually have issues with these questions when they come up. Beyond the obvious risks of injuring innocent 3rd parties, the biggest issue I have with a lot of people opining about how they’d react is an apparent assumption by many that they’ll know who all the bad guys are. At its core this is a discussion of how one will react to an active shooter (active robbery in this case) scenario. Seriously, what will be your first clue that a bank robbery has started? Are you in this kiosk when the stuff starts or in the grocery store’s checkout line twenty to twenty-five yards away? How many armed guys do you see and are you sure you see all of them? When/if you engage the bad guys, might someone (cops, security or another CHL holder) arriving after the “party� starts, mistake you for a bad guy? If you think it will be obvious you’d better think again.
My honest answer is this...My default policy is be a good witness and let the bank use its FDIC insurance policy to replace the money lost. Despite my confidence that my skills, were I around for any such event, I'd do my best to be a good witness and nothing more. If I am forced to defend my wife, myself or the life of a third party, then I’ll act accordingly. Generally speaking, I'm not going to initiate a gunfight against multiple VCAs with dozens of unknown variables including the possibility of armed "lookouts" in the crowd who were waiting for some idiot like me to draw a gun. Even more likely is the fact that I might be mistaken for one of the VCAs by responding security personnel, another CHL holder or police officers.
When you take the time out of your day to beat someone, it has a much longer lasting effect on their demeanor than simply shooting or tazing them.
G. C. Montgomery, Jr.