It sounds like you agree with me. If the piece of paper says you were told about the anti gun policy then the paper specifies what they "told" you and it's valid.Skiprr wrote:Ergo, having a written, published company policy--which doesn't conform to the exact wording of 30.06(3)(A)--can be prosecutable grounds, IMHO and IANAL, by having employees sign a statement that they have been "told" of and agree to said policy.boomerang wrote:Unless the paper specifies what they "told" you, it's still he said she said.
If the piece of paper simply says you were "told" about vague, unspecified HR policies, it's still he said she said about what you were "told"
unless they record it.
