Re: 20/20 Friday, April 4
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 10:02 pm
He should have talked to a lawyer before talking to anone else.
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
Venus Pax wrote:I watched this episode; I found the tone rather anti-gun all the way around.
It also made this issue more racially-charged than it probably was. This was more an issue of stupidity (on both sides) than race.
None of the actors in this situation are innocent. In spite of their money, the Cicarro family came off rather sleazy. The White family let their past in the old south prejudice them and cause them to act irrationally.
I'm afraid the evidence was stacked against Mr. White, and some of it was his own doing. I know nothing about New York's laws regarding self-defense, but I would have more sympathy for him had he stated that Dano Cicarro grabbed for his gun and he fired intentionally to keep him from taking it and using it against him. The fact that the blood was at the driveway's entrance doesn't look well for him either. It appears most avoidable.
I can understand wanting to protect your family, especially if you believe you see a lynch mob outside. I certainly wouldn't go out there to take it on. A wiser course of action would have been to wait inside the house with the guns ready while talking to the 911 dipatcher. Had Mr. White done that instead, and Dano Cicarro chose to start beating down the door in his drunken state, I think there's a chance Mr. White could have remained a free man, even in New York.
As for the 15-year-old girl that thought Aaron White was making threats toward her, she should have definitely taken action, but not the type she did. You don't ask a spoiled, drunken idiot for help in these instances. You tell your family, go to police, and keep your house guns handy.
You should do everything in your power to prevent a struggle, and that includes staying in your home.tarkus wrote:[quote=Why do you say that?45 4 life wrote:Black Father should have gotten life on this one no matter which story is true.
Imagine people are trespassing on your property. You go outside and tell them to leave. They refuse to leave and instead advance toward you. You display a firearm and repeat your legal order to get off your property. They continue to advance in the face of the gun. They grab at you and there's a struggle. Should you get life in prison if you shoot one of them in the struggle?