Re: That must've hurt
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 10:35 pm
Yep, the 460 is a beast. Just because it weighs as much as some rifles, don't mean you can hold it like one!
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
.357 Magnum and it shaved and spattered copiously.KBCraig wrote:And what caliber was that? If it was "a bunch of time ago", there were no revolvers chambered in anything even approaching .460 S& W Magnum.jimlongley wrote:A bunch of time ago a friend had a revolver which had been a little abused by a previous owner and it was seriously out of time. We took it out and tested it by putting butcher paper around it and checking the pattern of lead spatter from each chamber of the cylinder. Even with the extreme shaving that was going on there was never enough power in the ejected lead or gas to cut off a digit.
At 2900 ft-lbs of muzzle energy, I can absolutely believe there is enough energy escaping the gap to do serious damage to a digit.
Okay, it was badly out of time, and shaved a lot of lead. But factory loadings in lead-bullet .357 Magnum (in the "a bunch of years ago" time frame) produced less than 500 ft.-lbs of muzzle energy. Maybe 550, tops. JHP loadings were hotter, but not lead.jimlongley wrote:.357 Magnum and it shaved and spattered copiously.KBCraig wrote:And what caliber was that? If it was "a bunch of time ago", there were no revolvers chambered in anything even approaching .460 S& W Magnum.jimlongley wrote:A bunch of time ago a friend had a revolver which had been a little abused by a previous owner and it was seriously out of time. We took it out and tested it by putting butcher paper around it and checking the pattern of lead spatter from each chamber of the cylinder. Even with the extreme shaving that was going on there was never enough power in the ejected lead or gas to cut off a digit.
At 2900 ft-lbs of muzzle energy, I can absolutely believe there is enough energy escaping the gap to do serious damage to a digit.