Page 2 of 2
Re: Sword wielding man in Texas City
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:50 pm
by seamusTX
KRM45 wrote:... I will point out that DWI is generally a class B misd. while UCW is a class A misd. If I was the arresting officer I would certainly file the UCW charge.
That's a good point.
However, DWI is punished every single time the state gets a conviction; and for many people, losing their driver license is worse than going to jail for a few days or paying a fine.
Most first-offense misdemeanors get probation and deferred adjudication.
Do the police routinely search the car on a DWI arrest? I seem to recall reading somewhere that if one of the passengers was legal to drive, he would be allowed to take the car.
- Jim
Re: Sword wielding man in Texas City
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 11:58 pm
by KRM45
seamusTX wrote:KRM45 wrote:... I will point out that DWI is generally a class B misd. while UCW is a class A misd. If I was the arresting officer I would certainly file the UCW charge.
That's a good point.
However, DWI is punished every single time the state gets a conviction; and for many people, losing their driver license is worse than going to jail for a few days or paying a fine.
Most first-offense misdemeanors get probation and deferred adjudication.
Do the police routinely search the car on a DWI arrest? I seem to recall reading somewhere that if one of the passengers was legal to drive, he would be allowed to take the car.
- Jim
I don't have the statistics on conviction rates for various offenses, but I don't think the conviction rate would be higher for DWI than for UCW.
Search policies vary by department, and even by individual officer. Generaly when you arrest the driver of the vehicle you will search the car. One reason is to look for other contraband that could be used to reinforce your case (open container, paraphanalia, or the like for the DWI charge) or to search for evidence of another crime. In the event you impound the car you also want to inventory the property in the car.
As far as letting a sober licensed passenger take the car, that is a judgement or policy call. Personally I would let an immediate family member take the car home. I have seen some officers actually move the car to a legal parking place and leave it. Most of the time it gets towed around here.
Re: Sword wielding man in Texas City
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:59 pm
by tarkus
seamusTX wrote: Another offense that is rather easy to commit with a vehicle is criminal trespass.
Don't forget disorderly conduct. At least once a day I hear "abusive, indecent, profane, or vulgar language" and "unreasonable noise" coming from car stereos.
Re: Sword wielding man in Texas City
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 1:12 pm
by seamusTX
I completely forgot about that.
I have heard of people being cited for giving half a peace sign. If the officer wants to do more than write a ticket, a person carrying without a CHL could be in trouble.
- Jim
Re: Sword wielding man in Texas City
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 1:56 pm
by Fangs
When my best friend got his DWI the night before Halloween in '08 they inventoried everything in his car (17 closed beer cans, dog collar, pen, sunglasses, etc.)
I've heard a couple stories of passengers being left on the side of the street by officers arresting the driver and having the car towed.
Re: Sword wielding man in Texas City
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 3:44 pm
by Captain Matt
Russell wrote:Is it actually written in Texas law somewhere that extended middle finger = obscenity?
No. The law says "offensive gesture" not obscenity. The rest is for a jury to decide.
Re: Sword wielding man in Texas City
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 4:14 pm
by seamusTX
Russell wrote:Being cited for flipping someone the bird is a little excessive.
Someone I knew in Illinois got cited for it, but he was generally asking for it. I don't' know what the law was at the time.
It's a class C misdemeanor in Texas.
- Jim
Re: Sword wielding man in Texas City
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 5:46 pm
by NcongruNt
seamusTX wrote:Russell wrote:Being cited for flipping someone the bird is a little excessive.
Someone I knew in Illinois got cited for it, but he was generally asking for it. I don't' know what the law was at the time.
It's a class C misdemeanor in Texas.
- Jim
However, I believe it is in the group of Class C Misdemeanor convictions that can get you ineligible for a CHL (classified as Disorderly Conduct, IIRC). So, getting convicted of the obscene gesture would cause your CHL to be revoked, I believe.
Edited to add TPC reference:
Sec. 42.01. DISORDERLY CONDUCT. (a) A person commits an offense if he intentionally or knowingly:
(1) uses abusive, indecent, profane, or vulgar language in a public place, and the language by its very utterance tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace;
(2) makes an offensive gesture or display in a public place, and the gesture or display tends to incite an immediate breach of the peace;
Edited again to add the eligibility requirements:
GC 9411.172. ELIGIBILITY. (a) A person is eligible for a license to
carry a concealed handgun if the person:
(1) is a legal resident of this state for the six-month period
preceding the date of application under this subchapter or is otherwise
eligible for a license under Section 411 . I 73(a);
(2) is at least 21 years of age;
(3) has not been convicted of a felony;
(4) is not charged with the commission of a ,Class A or Class B
misdemeanor or an offense under Section 42.01, Penal Code, or of a
felony under an information or indictment;
(5) is not a fugitive from justice for a felony or a Class A or Class
B misdemeanor;
(6) is not a chemically dependent person;
(7) is not incapable of exercising sound judgment with respect to
the proper use and storage of a handgun;
(8) has not, in the five years preceding the date of application,
been convicted of a Class A or Class B misdemeanor or an offense
under Section 42.01, Penal Code;
(9) is fully qualified under applicable federal and state law to
purchase a handgun;
(10) has not been finally determined to be delinquent in making a
child support payment administered or collected by the attorney
general;
(11) has not been finally determined to be delinquent in the
payment of a tax or other money collected by the comptroller, the tax
collector of a political subdivision of the state, or any agency or subdi-
vision of the state;
(12) has not been finally determined to be in default on a loan
made under Chapter 57, Education Code;
(13) is not currently restricted under a court protective order or
subject to a restraining order affecting the spousal relationship, other
than a restraining order solely affecting properly interests;
(14) has not, in the 10 years preceding the date of application,
been adjudicated as having engaged in delinquent conduct violating a
penal law of the grade of felony; and
(15) has not made any material misrepresentation, or failed to
disclose any material fact, in an application submitted pursuant to
Section 411.I74 or in a request for application submitted pursuant to
Section 411.175.
(b) For the purposes of this section, an offense under the laws of this
state, another state, or the United States is:
(1) a felony if the offense, at the time of a person's application for
a license to carry a concealed handgun:
. (A) is designated by a law of this state as a felony;
(9) contains all the elements of an offense designated by a law
of this state as a felony; or
(C) is punishable by confinement for one year or more in a
penitentiary ; and
(2) a Class A misdemeanor if the offense is not a felony and
confinement in a jail other than a state jail felony facility is affixed as a
possible punishment.
(c) An individual who has been convicted two times within
the1O-year period preceding the date on which the person applies for
a license of an offense of the grade of Class B misdemeanor or greater
that involvesthe use of alcohol or a controlled substance as a statutory
element of the offense is a chemically dependent person for purposes
of this section and is not qualified to receive a license under this
subchapter. This subsection does not preclude the disqualification of
an individual for being a chemically dependent person if other
evidence exists to show that the person is a chemically dependent
person.
(d) For purposes of Subsection (a)(7), a person is incapable of
exercising sound judgment with respect to the proper use and storage
of a handgun if the person:
(1) has been diagnosed by a licensed physician as suffering from
a psychiatric disorder or condition that causes or is likely to cause
substantial impairment in judgment, mood, perception, impulse
control, or intellectualability;
(2) suffers from a psychiatric disorder or condition described by
Subdivision (1) that:
(A) is in remission but is reasonably likely to redevelop at a
future time; or
(B) requires continuous medical treatment to avoid redevelop-
ment;
(3) has been diagnosed by a licensed physician or declared by a
court to be incompetentto manage the person's own affairs; or
(4) has entered in a criminal proceeding a plea of not guilty by
reason of insanity.
(e) The following constitutes evidence that a person has a psychi-
atric disorder or condition described by Subsection (d)(l):
(1) involuntary psychiatric hospitalization in the preceding
five-year period;
(2) psychiatric hospitalization in the preceding two-year period;
(3) inpatient or residential substance abuse treatment in the
preceding five-year period;
(4) diagnosis in the preceding five-year period by a licensed
physician that the person is dependent on alcohol, a controlled
substance, or a similar substance; or
(5) diagnosis at any time by a licensed physician that the person
suffers or has suffered from a psychiatric disorder or condition
consisting of or relating to:
(A) schizophrenia or delusional disorder;
(B) bipolar disorder;
(C) chronic dementia, whether caused by illness, brain defect,
or brain injury;
(D) dissociative identity disorder;
(E) intermittent explosive disorder; or
(F) antisocial personality disorder.
(9 Notwithstanding Subsection (d), a person who has previously
been diagnosed as suffering from a psychiatric disorder or condition
described by Subsection (d) or listed in Subsection (e) is not because
of that disorder or condition incapable of exercising sound judgment
with respect to the proper use and storage of a handgun if the person
provides the department with a certificate from a licensed physician
whose primary practice is in the field of psychiatry stating that the
psychiatric disorder or condition is in remission and is not reasonably
likely to develop at a Mure time.
(g) Notwistanding Subsection (a)(2), a person who is at least 18
years of age but not yet 21 years of age is eligible for a license to carry
a concealed handgun if the person:
(1) is a member or veteran of the United States armed forces,
including a member or veteran of the reserves or national guard;
(2) was discharged under honorable conditions, if discharged
from the United States armed forces, reserves, or national guard; and
(3) meets the other eligibility requirements of Subsection (a)
except for the minimum age required by federal law to purchase a
handgun.
(h) The issuance of a license to carry a concealed handgun to a
person eligible under Subsection (g) does not affect the person's
ability to purchase a handgun or ammunition under federal law.
Re: Sword wielding man in Texas City
Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:59 pm
by KD5NRH
Fangs wrote:When my best friend got his DWI the night before Halloween in '08 they inventoried everything in his car (17 closed beer cans, dog collar, pen, sunglasses, etc.)
I've heard a couple stories of passengers being left on the side of the street by officers arresting the driver and having the car towed.
I'm pretty sure they'd take one look at all the junk in my car and call someone to come pick it up...just identifying some of that stuff without my help could take days.
Re: Sword wielding man in Texas City
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:23 am
by hheremtp
03Lightningrocks wrote:seamusTX wrote:This is exactly the case.
The man was legal to have a sword and a handgun in his truck, as long as they were concealed and he was not engaged in criminal activity.
If the story is correct, he committed aggravated assault by threatening someone with a deadly weapon (the sword).
At that point, he lost his 46.02 vehicular exception and was guilty of carrying an illegal knife and handgun.
If he had a CHL, he would not have been committing a violation by having the handgun, though he would still be guilty of aggravated assault.
- Jim
Interesting. I was not aware of this loop hole in the law. So you lose the 46.02 vehicular exception if while having the gun in the car you commit a felony? Does this apply to any felony or just aggravated assault? I was already aware that displaying your weapon as a warning to someone was a no-no. I think allot of folks are unaware of this infraction also. It just goes to show that being educated in the legalities involved if one decides to carry concealed in a vehicle.
03Lightningrocks
PC W6.02. UNLAWFUL CARRYING WEAPONS. (a) A person
commits an offense if the person intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly
carries on or about his or her person a handgun, illegal knife, or club if
the person is not:
(1) on the person's own premises or premises under the person's
control; or
(2) inside of or directly en route to a motor vehicle that is owned
by the person or under the person's control.
(a-I)
A person commits an offense if the person intentionally, knowingly,
or recklessly carries on or about his or her person a handgun in a
motor vehicle that is owned by the person or under the person's
control at any time in which:
(1) the handgun is in plain view; or
(2)
the person is:
(A) engaged in criminal activity, other than a Class C misdemeanor
that is a violation of a law or ordinance regulating traffic;
(B) prohibited by law from possessing a firearm; or
(C) a member of a criminal street gang, as defined by Section
According to this section of TPC I think that brandishing a sword and telling someone that you are going to kill them definatly constitutes "engaged in criminal activity, other than a Class C misdemeanor"
Re: Sword wielding man in Texas City
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 1:09 pm
by 03Lightningrocks
hheremtp wrote:03Lightningrocks wrote:seamusTX wrote:This is exactly the case.
The man was legal to have a sword and a handgun in his truck, as long as they were concealed and he was not engaged in criminal activity.
If the story is correct, he committed aggravated assault by threatening someone with a deadly weapon (the sword).
At that point, he lost his 46.02 vehicular exception and was guilty of carrying an illegal knife and handgun.
If he had a CHL, he would not have been committing a violation by having the handgun, though he would still be guilty of aggravated assault.
- Jim
Interesting. I was not aware of this loop hole in the law. So you lose the 46.02 vehicular exception if while having the gun in the car you commit a felony? Does this apply to any felony or just aggravated assault? I was already aware that displaying your weapon as a warning to someone was a no-no. I think allot of folks are unaware of this infraction also. It just goes to show that being educated in the legalities involved if one decides to carry concealed in a vehicle.
03Lightningrocks
PC W6.02. UNLAWFUL CARRYING WEAPONS. (a) A person
commits an offense if the person intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly
carries on or about his or her person a handgun, illegal knife, or club if
the person is not:
(1) on the person's own premises or premises under the person's
control; or
(2) inside of or directly en route to a motor vehicle that is owned
by the person or under the person's control.
(a-I)
A person commits an offense if the person intentionally, knowingly,
or recklessly carries on or about his or her person a handgun in a
motor vehicle that is owned by the person or under the person's
control at any time in which:
(1) the handgun is in plain view; or
(2)
the person is:
(A) engaged in criminal activity, other than a Class C misdemeanor
that is a violation of a law or ordinance regulating traffic;
(B) prohibited by law from possessing a firearm; or
(C) a member of a criminal street gang, as defined by Section
According to this section of TPC I think that brandishing a sword and telling someone that you are going to kill them definatly constitutes "engaged in criminal activity, other than a Class C misdemeanor"
