propellerhead wrote:It was funny. I just wasn't sure. It's hard to read the tone in text. :)
Non-CHL fires CHL's gun
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
switch
- Senior Member
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 6:06 am
- Location: Venus, TX
- Contact:
shooting w/another's gun
Generally, if the shooting is justified, they do not look to closely at how the shooter came to have the gun available.
The subway shooter was no-billed at first. When he went on local radio/tv and told everyone it was dangerous in NY (duh) and everyone should have a gun, the DA took it to another grand jury and got an indictment.
I heard about a felon that was visiting in a home that was invaded. He managed to disarm an attacker and protect his friend - but he was charged with possession of a firearm.
The subway shooter was no-billed at first. When he went on local radio/tv and told everyone it was dangerous in NY (duh) and everyone should have a gun, the DA took it to another grand jury and got an indictment.
I heard about a felon that was visiting in a home that was invaded. He managed to disarm an attacker and protect his friend - but he was charged with possession of a firearm.
-
cxm
- Senior Member
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 8:00 pm
- Location: Tejas, CSA
Re: Non-CHL fires CHL's gun
Can't see any reason why not...
Even if there were a prohibition, the doctrine of neccessety would solve the problem if it was a good shoot.
FWIW
Chuck
Even if there were a prohibition, the doctrine of neccessety would solve the problem if it was a good shoot.
FWIW
Chuck
propellerhead wrote:I saw an interesting question on a gun forum. The poster asks if his girlfriend has a CHL and was carrying, and a a problem arises situation arises, can he legally shoot an attacker using his girlfriend's gun? Let's assume they are driving around in his car (if that makes a difference) and he does not have a CHL but can legally own a pistol.
Your thoughts?
Hoist on High the Bonnie Blue Flag That Bears the Single Star!
-
KBCraig
- Banned
- Posts: 5251
- Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 3:32 am
- Location: Texarkana
Doesn't Texas recognize the concept of "felony murder" (by whatever name)? If so, then if someone accidentally kills a third party while using justified deadly force, the legal blame lies with the person doing whatever justified DF.
If a policeman pursuing a felon accidentally hits and kills someone, the fleeing felon gets charged with murder.
Kevin
If a policeman pursuing a felon accidentally hits and kills someone, the fleeing felon gets charged with murder.
Kevin
- Liberty
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6343
- Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 8:49 pm
- Location: Galveston
- Contact:
I don't know what the law has to say about this, but in this situation I don't think most jurys would give a murder concivtion. Now if the felon were actively involved in fireing back, that would be different.KBCraig wrote:Doesn't Texas recognize the concept of "felony murder" (by whatever name)? If so, then if someone accidentally kills a third party while using justified deadly force, the legal blame lies with the person doing whatever justified DF.
If a policeman pursuing a felon accidentally hits and kills someone, the fleeing felon gets charged with murder.
Kevin
-
robert_de_niro
- Member
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 4:00 pm
- Location: Amarillo
- Contact:
jbirds1210 wrote:I don't know what the law says......but I think it would definitely be difficult to find a Texas jury that would think of it as a negative action. No matter what the law or jury says...if things are that out of control, I would use the gun.
The great thing is that both people in Texas could just go and get a license of their own and not worry about it![]()
Jason
In the words of my CHL instructor, "I'd rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6."
