Page 2 of 2

Re: Hellcat .380

Posted: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:31 am
by CompVest
Please, put the thread back on topic. This isn't a thread on the merits of of any gun except the Hellcat.

Re: Hellcat .380

Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 10:49 am
by Embalmo
jeeperbryan wrote:
Embalmo wrote:
jeeperbryan wrote:My guess is that it'll be as unreliable as all the other pocket .380s I've tried or shot. I've just about given up of the pocket 380 trend. Pick any model [P3AT|LCP|TCP|P238|Diamondback|Hellcat] and you'll find 10 people that have had issues and 10 people that have had no issues. Then you'll get people that claim 100% reliability....after 100 rounds :) Until someone comes out with a pocket size Glock 26/27, I'm just sitting back and watching....
Good luck finding 10 dissatisfied LCP owners. One should really do research before disparaging so many guns in one post.

It's not hard to find dissatisfied LCP owners. Here's a simple google search that will return quite a few problem threads:

http://tinyurl.com/322hp7r

As far as research, nothing is quite like firsthand right? With exception to the Hellcat, I have owned or know someone that has owned every model I listed.
I had a creampuff Pinto and I'm sure someone has had a lemon Porche. One cannot take that many firearms and blanketly pronounce them as unreliable based on anecdotal/firsthand evidence. There are reliable and unreliable "pocket guns".

Embalmo

Re: Hellcat .380

Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 5:55 pm
by Rex B
Embalmo wrote: The LCP was both a rip-off and an improvement of the P3AT.
I have both. My P3AT is more reliable
Had a Pinto too :)

Cabellas stocks the Hellcat.

Re: Hellcat .380

Posted: Thu Dec 02, 2010 6:41 pm
by CompVest
CompVest wrote:Please, put the thread back on topic. This isn't a thread on the merits of of any gun except the Hellcat.

Okay one more time. The topic is info on the Hellcat .390.