


Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
What's the liklihood of your 'back shot' passing through the "guy" and hitting the cashier or some other bystander? What if the cashier pulled a gun, shot the perceived threat and 2-3 people standing in line?RoyGBiv wrote:So if I'm standing behind him on line and I overhear these threats...
And I see a "bulge" and his hand in his coat...
And I draw and fire.... injuring the guy, or worse..
Standing behind him in line, it's likely the entry wound would be in his back.
What's the likelihood of a "No-Bill".?
Did stick around, and does work for the company.Aggiedad wrote:There's not enough info in the OP to know for certain but could it be that this guy really was going to rob Home Depot and lost his nerve when she started crying? Did the "loss prevention" guy stick around afterward for any kind of debriefing or did he leave the store immediately? Inquiring minds would like to know.
That's kind of what I was thinking...Oldgringo wrote:Aggiedad wrote:There's not enough info in the OP to know for certain but could it be that this guy really was going to rob Home Depot and lost his nerve when she started crying? Did the "loss prevention" guy stick around afterward for any kind of debriefing or did he leave the store immediately? Inquiring minds would like to know.
While this is true...I too believe I would have shot from behind. IF you are going to stop a threat from the rear, you should make sure and place your shots in a way as to limit the possibility of 'pass through'Oldgringo wrote:What's the liklihood of your 'back shot' passing through the "guy" and hitting the cashier or some other bystander? What if the cashier pulled a gun, shot the perceived threat and 2-3 people standing in line?RoyGBiv wrote:So if I'm standing behind him on line and I overhear these threats...
And I see a "bulge" and his hand in his coat...
And I draw and fire.... injuring the guy, or worse..
Standing behind him in line, it's likely the entry wound would be in his back.
What's the likelihood of a "No-Bill".?
A CHL is not a BATMAN license.
Only until we get "Arizona carry."Oldgringo wrote:Maybe we do need CHL licenses?
Thanks for the heads up, I fixed it.ELB wrote:btw, wrt to the OP, I don't think I would have so accurately identified and located my niece on a public forum, especially for an incident that is not otherwise public (apparently, or yet).
I guess I'm confused a bit...Oldgringo wrote:What's the liklihood of your 'back shot' passing through the "guy" and hitting the cashier or some other bystander? What if the cashier pulled a gun, shot the perceived threat and 2-3 people standing in line?RoyGBiv wrote:So if I'm standing behind him on line and I overhear these threats...
And I see a "bulge" and his hand in his coat...
And I draw and fire.... injuring the guy, or worse..
Standing behind him in line, it's likely the entry wound would be in his back.
What's the likelihood of a "No-Bill".?
A CHL is not a BATMAN license.
Remember the standard is what a reasonable man would perceive and do under the circumstances. From the situation as described, there would be no way for a reasonable man who observed it to tell it wasn't a robbery, and every reason to believe it was with an innocent life in immediate danger.RoyGBiv wrote:So if I'm standing behind him on line and I overhear these threats...
And I see a "bulge" and his hand in his coat...
And I draw and fire.... injuring the guy, or worse..
Standing behind him in line, it's likely the entry wound would be in his back.
What's the likelihood of a "No-Bill".?
PC §9.31. SELF-DEFENSE. (a) Except as provided in Subsection
(b), a person is justified in using force against another when and to the
degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary
to protect the actor against the other's use or attempted use of
unlawful force. The actor's belief that the force was immediately
necessary as described by this subsection is presumed to be reasonable
if the actor:
(1) knew or had reason to believe that the person against whom
the force was used:
(A) unlawfully and with force entered, or was attempting to
enter unlawfully and with force, the actor's occupied habitation, vehicle,
or place of business or employment;
(B) unlawfully and with force removed, or was attempting to
remove unlawfully and with force, the actor from the actor's habitation,
vehicle, or place of business or employment; or
(C) was committing or attempting to commit aggravated kidnapping,
murder, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault, robbery,
or aggravated robbery;