Re: New .22 pistol
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:14 pm
Ordered!warhorse10_9 wrote:I have this: http://www.volquartsen.com/pictures/322-clip-loader" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The focal point for Texas firearms information and discussions
https://texaschlforum.com/
Ordered!warhorse10_9 wrote:I have this: http://www.volquartsen.com/pictures/322-clip-loader" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I have one of these as well and it is FANTASTIC!!!warhorse10_9 wrote:I have this: http://www.volquartsen.com/pictures/322-clip-loader
Its so awesome. No getting lead or copper residue all over your hands with this one. Takes about 10 seconds to load a magazine.
the Mark III is a nice weapon, mine is blued 5.5" , and $335 +tx at Academy, so not a horrible price.PostShooter wrote:Would anyone recommend this Ruger as a first-time pistol for a 10-12 year-old? I thought of getting my son a Walther P22 to train him on when he got a bit older, but if the Mark III is nice, I'd reconsider. Especially if there isn't much difference in price
Teamless wrote:the Mark III is a nice weapon, mine is blued 5.5" , and $335 +tx at Academy, so not a horrible price.PostShooter wrote:Would anyone recommend this Ruger as a first-time pistol for a 10-12 year-old? I thought of getting my son a Walther P22 to train him on when he got a bit older, but if the Mark III is nice, I'd reconsider. Especially if there isn't much difference in price
My boss bought one for $460 recently (Stainless, etc) for him and his 8 year old son. His son shoots it very well, so I would recommend it.
Also the Mark III has a much longer barrel than the P22, so would be more accurate to shoot (obviously)
I would strongly recommend the Ruger as a first pistol for anyone. It is a very good weapon, and one that he will be able to pass down to his kids as their first gun, with just a little care taken of it. I feel the same way about the Browning Buckmark (and my daughter will happily verify it as a great first gun). Between the two, I think the Ruger is actually slightly better but the Browning is usually slightly cheaper in price.PostShooter wrote:Would anyone recommend this Ruger as a first-time pistol for a 10-12 year-old? I thought of getting my son a Walther P22 to train him on when he got a bit older, but if the Mark III is nice, I'd reconsider. Especially if there isn't much difference in price.
That's pretty much what I wound up doing to, except that I use an Otis cleaning set with that flexible cable instead of a bore snake.74novaman wrote:After reading about what a pain it is, I bought a bore snake and a can of cleaner. If its working reliably, I'll just spray and snake it every time I use it. Until I get bored one day and have an afternoon to disassemble and reassemble it I guess.WildBill wrote:Just for the record, I have never field-stripped my Ruger to clean it. I bought it 20 years ago from my brother, who owned it for 20 years and he claims that he never cleaned it. It continues to function perfectly.The Annoyed Man wrote:Well done! I have the 5.5" stainless hunter model. I love shooting that thing.
Two things to keep under consideration:
- Easy to take down. An absolute woolly booger to put back together. Even following the directions in the owners manual to the letter won't work every time. Be patient.
Whenever I teach a new shooter to shoot handguns, regardless of age, I start them on my 22/45. It's perfect for it. The recoil is practically nonexistant, and they are accurate little boogers too; so they are real good for teaching good technique.PostShooter wrote:Would anyone recommend this Ruger as a first-time pistol for a 10-12 year-old? I thought of getting my son a Walther P22 to train him on when he got a bit older, but if the Mark III is nice, I'd reconsider. Especially if there isn't much difference in price.
here is a pawn shop on El Dorado Blvd (Webster) if you are in the area, that has a 22/45 (used) marked at $350.92f-fan wrote:Just havent dropped the $400 + plus on the 22/45 I want