Handled a Wilson Combat CQB...floored.

Gun, shooting and equipment discussions unrelated to CHL issues

Moderator: carlson1

Zoomie
Senior Member
Posts: 239
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:32 pm

Re: Handled a Wilson Combat CQB...floored.

Post by Zoomie »

:iagree: , there's no reason not to shoot 3/4in groups (this is center to center of course) at 7yds ( I assume we're talking freehand as well).
"Speed is fine accuracy is final."
-Wyatt Earp

"Great danger lies in the notion we can reason with evil."
-Winston Churchill

And the wind shall say 'Here were decent godless people'. Their only monument the asphalt road and a thousand lost golf balls.
-T.S Elliot
RECIT
Senior Member
Posts: 1620
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 8:27 am
Location: Sugar Land, TX

Re: Handled a Wilson Combat CQB...floored.

Post by RECIT »

Most of the groups published in gun rags and marketing are usually shot in a block or vice of some sort or from a rest with very very slow shot timing to see what the gun can do without a human factor. Most firearms are more accurate than their owners...we are the variable in the experiment for sure. I think the Wilson offerings are beautiful, but have no need or want to drop that kind of coin on one. I sure want to shoot a few though...
"I am a Free Man, regardless of what set of 'rules' surround me. When I find them tolerable, I tolerate them. When I find them obnoxious, I ignore them. I remain free, because I know and understand that I alone bear full responsibility for everything I do, or chose not to do."
User avatar
WildBill
Senior Member
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Handled a Wilson Combat CQB...floored.

Post by WildBill »

How about this one?

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=46207" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA Endowment Member
jeeperbryan
Senior Member
Posts: 426
Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 10:14 am
Location: Dallas, TX (North Dallas)

Re: Handled a Wilson Combat CQB...floored.

Post by jeeperbryan »

HankB wrote:Some years ago I took a high-round-count class and several of the other folks were using Wilsons . . . by the second day, they all had band-aids all over their hands - too many sharp edges. How was the CQB for general handling?

For a list price of $2550, one could get an Ed Brown Kobra or Special Forces and have money left over . . . or a Les Baer Premier II or TRS and have more money left over.

And any of these would trump the Wilsons I've seen.

Not that Wilsons are bad . . . it's just that the way they're priced today, better values in upper-end 1911s abound.

(And at 7 yards, "fist sized" groups aren't particularly impressive unless the magazine was emptied in <2 seconds or so.)
x100. At that price I'd be looking at an Ed Brown. I have handled Ed Brown, Wilson, and Nighthawks and IMHO the Ed Browns are the better of the three.

Agreed on 7 yd group. I can shoot fist sized groups with a run of the mill Kimber or Springer so not a great indicator. I thought they were guaranteed to shoot a 1" group at 25 yards or something like that. I'm sure that's out of a vice, but still.
User avatar
AEA
Senior Member
Posts: 5110
Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:00 pm
Location: North Texas

Re: Handled a Wilson Combat CQB...floored.

Post by AEA »

WildBill wrote:How about this one?

viewtopic.php?f=20&t=46207" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Thanks Bill for the plug! I had it priced right for what it was and a lot of extras so it has sold.
Alan - ANYTHING I write is MY OPINION only.
Certified Curmudgeon - But, my German Shepherd loves me!
NRA-Life, USN '65-'69 & '73-'79: RM1
1911's RULE!
Post Reply

Return to “General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion”